Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 1999 Nov;67(5):591–595. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.67.5.591

Link between the CSF shunt and achievement in adults with spina bifida

G Hunt 1, P Oakeshott 1, S Kerry 1
PMCID: PMC1736621  PMID: 10519863

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—A few enterprising adults with shunt treated spina bifida live independently in the community, have a job in competitive employment, and drive to work in their own car. By contrast others with similar disability but lacking their motivation remain dependent on care and supervision. The aim of this study was to identify events in the history of their shunt which may have influenced their subsequent achievement.
METHODS—Between June 1963 and January 1971 117 babies born in East Anglia with open spina bifida had their backs closed regardless of the severity of their condition. When reviewed in 1997 every case was ascertained. Sixty had died and the 57 survivors had a mean age of 30. These were assigned to two groups: achievers and non-achievers, according to their attainments in independence, employment, and use of a car.
RESULTS—Of the 57 survivors nine had no shunt and eight of these were achievers. All were of normal intelligence (IQ⩾80) and only one was severely disabled. Of the 48 with shunts only 20 were achievers (OR 11.2, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.3-96.8). Lack of achievement in these 48 was associated with revisions of the shunt, particularly when revisions were performed after the age of 2. Sixteen patients had never required a revision and 11 (69%) were achievers; 10 had had revisions only during infancy and five (50%) were achievers; 22 had had revisions after their second birthday and only four (18%) were achievers (p<0.001). Elective revisions were not performed in this cohort and in 75% of patients revisions had been preceded by clear symptoms of raised intracranial pressure.
CONCLUSION—Revisions of the shunt, particularly after the age of 2, are associated with poor long term achievement in adults with spina bifida.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ames M. D., Schut L. Results of treatment of 171 consecutive myelomeningoceles, 1963 to 1968. Pediatrics. 1972 Sep;50(3):466–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Biglan A. W. Ophthalmologic complications of meningomyelocele: a longitudinal study. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1990;88:389–462. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caines E., Dahl M. Ophthalmological findings in a prospective study of 22 children with spina bifida cystica. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Dec;7 (Suppl 1):52–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gaston H. Does the spina bifida clinic need an ophthalmologist? Z Kinderchir. 1985 Dec;40 (Suppl 1):46–50. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guthkelch A. N. Aspects of the surgical management of myelomeningocele: a review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1986 Aug;28(4):525–532. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1986.tb14297.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hemmer R., Böhm B. Once a shunt, always a shunt? Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 1976;(37):69–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1976.tb04282.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hunt G. M. 'The median survival time in open spina bifida'. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997 Aug;39(8):568–568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunt G. M., Holmes A. E. Some factors relating to intelligence in treated children with spina bifida cystica. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 1975;(35):65–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1975.tb03581.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hunt G. M. Open spina bifida: outcome for a complete cohort treated unselectively and followed into adulthood. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1990 Feb;32(2):108–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb16910.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hunt G. M., Poulton A. Open spina bifida: a complete cohort reviewed 25 years after closure. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1995 Jan;37(1):19–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1995.tb11929.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hunt G. M. Spina bifida: implications for 100 children at school. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1981 Apr;23(2):160–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1981.tb02438.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hunt G., Lewin W., Gleave J., Gairdner D. Predictive factors in open myelomeningocele with special reference to sensory level. Br Med J. 1973 Oct 27;4(5886):197–201. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5886.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hurley A. D., Bell S. Educational and vocational outcome of adults with spina bifida in relationship to neuropsychological testing. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1994 Dec;4 (Suppl 1):17–18. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Iddon J. L., Morgan D. J., Sahakian B. J. Cognitive dysfunction in patients with congenital hydrocephalus and spina bifida: evidence for a dysexecutive syndrome? Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1996 Dec;6 (Suppl 1):41–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaiser G., Jones H. C. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in 10-day-old rats with congenital hydrocephalus. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1991 Dec;1 (Suppl 1):20–22. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1042531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Laurence K. M. Effect of early surgery for spina bifida cystica on survival and quality of life. Lancet. 1974 Feb 23;1(7852):301–304. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)92606-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lima M., Dòmini M., Libri M. The varicocele in pediatric age: 207 cases treated with microsurgical technique. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Feb;7(1):30–33. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1071044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lorber J., Pucholt V. When is a shunt no longer necessary? An investigation of 300 patients with hydrocephalus and myelomeningocele: 11-22 year follow up. Z Kinderchir. 1981 Dec;34(4):327–329. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1063369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lorber J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971 Jun;13(3):279–303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lumenta C. B., Skotarczak U. Long-term follow-up in 233 patients with congenital hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 1995 Mar;11(3):173–175. doi: 10.1007/BF00570260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Raimondi A. J., Soare P. Intellectual development in shunted hydrocephalic children. Am J Dis Child. 1974 May;127(5):664–671. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1974.02110240050005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Shurtleff D. B., Foltz E. L., Loeser J. D. Hydrocephalus. A definition of its progression and relationship to intellectual function, diagnosis, and complications. Am J Dis Child. 1973 May;125(5):688–693. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1973.04160050042008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Smith G. K., Smith E. D. Selection for treatment in spina bifida cystica. Br Med J. 1973 Oct 27;4(5886):189–197. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5886.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Stark G. D., Drummond M. Results of selective early operation in myelomeningocele. Arch Dis Child. 1973 Sep;48(9):676–683. doi: 10.1136/adc.48.9.676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tomlinson P., Sugarman I. D. Complications with shunts in adults with spina bifida. BMJ. 1995 Jul 29;311(7000):286–287. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES