Abstract
OBJECTIVES—The drive to measure outcome during rehabilitation after brain injury has led to the increased use of the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM), a 30 item, seven level ordinal scale. The objectives of the study were to determine the psychometric structure, internal consistency, and other characteristics of the measure. METHODS—Psychometric analyses including both traditional principal components analysis and Rasch analysis were carried out on FIM+FAM data from 2268 assessments in 965 patients from 11 brain injury rehabilitation programmes. RESULTS—Two emergent principal components were characterised as representing physical and cognitive functioning respectively. Subscales based on these components were shown to have high internal consistency and reliability. These subscales and the full scale conformed only partially to a Rasch model. Use of raw item ratings, as opposed to transformed ratings, to produce summary scores for the two subscales and the full scale did not introduce serious distortion. CONCLUSION—The full FIM+FAM scale and two derived subscales have high internal reliability and the use of untransformed ratings should be adequate for most clinical and research purposes in comparable samples of patients with head injury.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (94.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dickson H. G., Köhler F. The multi-dimensionality of the FIM motor items precludes an interval scaling using Rasch analysis. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996 Sep;28(3):159–162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donaghy S., Wass P. J. Interrater reliability of the Functional Assessment Measure in a brain injury rehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Oct;79(10):1231–1236. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90267-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Granger C. V., Divan N., Fiedler R. C. Functional assessment scales. A study of persons after traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Mar-Apr;74(2):107–113. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harvey R. F., Jellinek H. M. Functional performance assessment: a program approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1981 Sep;62(9):456–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McGregor K., Pentland B. Head injury rehabilitation in the U.K.: an economic perspective. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Jul;45(2):295–303. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00345-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rappaport M., Hall K. M., Hopkins K., Belleza T., Cope D. N. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar;63(3):118–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tesio L., Cantagallo A. The functional assessment measure (FAM) in closed traumatic brain injury outpatients: a Rasch-based psychometric study. J Outcome Meas. 1998;2(2):79–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]