Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2000 Aug;69(2):204–209. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.2.204

Emotional and cognitive consequences of head injury in relation to the Glasgow outcome scale

J Wilson 1, L Pettigrew 1, G Teasdale 1
PMCID: PMC1737066  PMID: 10896694

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—There is current debate over the issue of the best way of assessing outcome after head injury. One criticism of scales of disability and handicap such as the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) is that they fail to capture the subjective perspective of the person with head injury. The aims of the study were to investigate aspects of the validity of structured interviews for the GOS, and address the issue of the relation between the GOS and subjective reports of health outcome.
METHODS—A total of 135 patients with head injury were assessed using the GOS and an extended GOS (GOSE) and other measures of outcome and clinical status at 6 months after injury.
RESULTS—There were robust correlations between the GOS and measures of initial injury severity (particularly post-traumatic amnesia) and outcome assessed by disability scales (particularly the disbility rating scale (DRS)); however, associations with cognitive tests were generally modest. There were also strong correlations with self report measures of health outcome: both the GOS and GOSE were related to depression measured by the Beck depression inventory, mental wellbeing assessed by the general health questionnaire, and to all subscales of the short form-36. The GOS scales were also strongly associated with frequency of reported symptoms and problems on the neurobehavioural functioning inventory.
CONCLUSIONS—The GOS and GOSE show consistent relations with other outcome measures including subjective reports of health outcome; they thus remain useful overall summary assessments of outcome of head injury.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson S. I., Housley A. M., Jones P. A., Slattery J., Miller J. D. Glasgow Outcome Scale: an inter-rater reliability study. Brain Inj. 1993 Jul-Aug;7(4):309–317. doi: 10.3109/02699059309034957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boake C., High W. M., Jr Functional outcome from traumatic brain injury: unidimensional or multidimensional? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Mar-Apr;75(2):105–113. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199603000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooks D. N., Hosie J., Bond M. R., Jennett B., Aughton M. Cognitive sequelae of severe head injury in relation to the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 May;49(5):549–553. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.5.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clifton G. L., Hayes R. L., Levin H. S., Michel M. E., Choi S. C. Outcome measures for clinical trials involving traumatically brain-injured patients: report of a conference. Neurosurgery. 1992 Nov;31(5):975–978. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199211000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collin C., Wade D. T., Davies S., Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–63. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Girard D., Brown J., Burnett-Stolnack M., Hashimoto N., Hier-Wellmer S., Perlman O. Z., Seigerman C. The relationship of neuropsychological status and productive outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1996 Sep;10(9):663–676. doi: 10.1080/026990596124089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall K., Cope D. N., Rappaport M. Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale: comparative usefulness in following recovery in traumatic head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985 Jan;66(1):35–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jennett B., Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975 Mar 1;1(7905):480–484. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92830-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jennett B., Snoek J., Bond M. R., Brooks N. Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981 Apr;44(4):285–293. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.44.4.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kreutzer J. S., Marwitz J. H., Seel R., Serio C. D. Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Feb;77(2):116–124. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90155-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levin H. S., Grossman R. G., Rose J. E., Teasdale G. Long-term neuropsychological outcome of closed head injury. J Neurosurg. 1979 Apr;50(4):412–422. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.50.4.0412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McCleary C., Satz P., Forney D., Light R., Zaucha K., Asarnow R., Namerow N. Depression after traumatic brain injury as a function of Glasgow Outcome Score. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1998 Apr;20(2):270–279. doi: 10.1076/jcen.20.2.270.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pettigrew L. E., Wilson J. T., Teasdale G. M. Assessing disability after head injury: improved use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurosurg. 1998 Dec;89(6):939–943. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.6.0939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rappaport M., Hall K. M., Hopkins K., Belleza T., Cope D. N. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982 Mar;63(3):118–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Satz P., Zaucha K., Forney D. L., McCleary C., Asarnow R. F., Light R., Levin H., Kelly D., Bergsneider M., Hovda D. Neuropsychological, psychosocial and vocational correlates of the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months post-injury: a study of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Inj. 1998 Jul;12(7):555–567. doi: 10.1080/026990598122322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith-Knapp K., Corrigan J. D., Arnett J. A. Predicting functional independence from neuropsychological tests following traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1996 Sep;10(9):651–661. doi: 10.1080/026990596124070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Teasdale G. M., Pettigrew L. E., Wilson J. T., Murray G., Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):587–597. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Teasdale G., Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974 Jul 13;2(7872):81–84. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson J. T., Pettigrew L. E., Teasdale G. M. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573–585. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES