Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2000 Oct;69(4):487–493. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.4.487

Are the modified "simple questions" a valid and reliable measure of health related quality of life after stroke?

P Dorman 1, M Dennis 1, P Sandercock 1
PMCID: PMC1737115  PMID: 10990509

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Two "simple questions" were developed as a minimalist measurement tool to assess outcome in large trials and epidemiological studies after stroke. A previous study of their validity had disclosed ambiguities in their wording. In this study, the clarity, validity, and reliability of a modified version of these simple questions were examined. The relation between patients' responses to these questions and two widely used generic measures of health related quality of life were also studied.
METHODS—A hospital based stroke register cohort of 152 patients, who were all visited at home by a study nurse, was used to study validity. A cohort of 1753 patients derived from the International Stroke Trial was used to study the relation with measures of quality of life. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with which responses to each question predicted the patients' outcome measured using standard instruments was assessed. The distribution of scores for the EuroQol and SF-36 was examined for patients classified as dependent, independent, and fully recovered by the combined use of the modified simple questions.
RESULTS—The modified "dependency" question had excellent sensitivity (>85%), specificity (>79%), and accuracy (>82%) for identifying dependency after stroke. The "problems" question had good sensitivity (65-88%) and moderate specificity (36-72%) for the detection of problems in a broad range of domains. The combined use of the modified dependency and problems questions provided a valid, simple, and reliable overall indicator of health related quality of life after stroke.
CONCLUSIONS—The modified simple questions have excellent face validity and good measurement properties for the assessment of outcome after stroke. They are particularly well suited for large epidemiological studies and randomised trials.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bamford J. M., Sandercock P. A., Warlow C. P., Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989 Jun;20(6):828–828. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.6.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brennan P., Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1491–1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dorman P. J., Dennis M., Sandercock P. How do scores on the EuroQol relate to scores on the SF-36 after stroke? Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2146–2151. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dorman P. J., Slattery J., Farrell B., Dennis M. S., Sandercock P. A. A randomised comparison of the EuroQol and Short Form-36 after stroke. United Kingdom collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. BMJ. 1997 Aug 23;315(7106):461–461. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7106.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dorman P. J., Waddell F., Slattery J., Dennis M., Sandercock P. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQol questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased? Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1883–1887. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dorman P. J., Waddell F., Slattery J., Dennis M., Sandercock P. Is the EuroQol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke. 1997 Oct;28(10):1876–1882. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dorman P., Slattery J., Farrell B., Dennis M., Sandercock P. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1998 Jan;29(1):63–68. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.1.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kay R., Wong K. S., Yu Y. L., Chan Y. W., Tsoi T. H., Ahuja A. T., Chan F. L., Fong K. Y., Law C. B., Wong A. Low-molecular-weight heparin for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 1995 Dec 14;333(24):1588–1593. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199512143332402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. O'Rourke S., MacHale S., Signorini D., Dennis M. Detecting psychiatric morbidity after stroke: comparison of the GHQ and the HAD Scale. Stroke. 1998 May;29(5):980–985. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.5.980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. RANKIN J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957 May;2(5):200–215. doi: 10.1177/003693305700200504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wade D. T., Legh-Smith J., Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7(4):176–181. doi: 10.3109/03790798509165991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wellwood I., Dennis M. S., Warlow C. P. A comparison of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke. Age Ageing. 1995 Jan;24(1):54–57. doi: 10.1093/ageing/24.1.54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES