Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2000 Dec;69(6):728–732. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.6.728

Community services in multiple sclerosis: still a matter of chance

J Freeman 1, A Thompson 1
PMCID: PMC1737174  PMID: 11080223

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—People with multiple sclerosis often have multiple complex needs that require input from a wide range of services. Many complain that services are inadequate and poorly coordinated. Few studies have been undertaken to support this contention and objective data are scarce. The level of services and home modifications received by people with multiple sclerosis across a broad range of disease severity has been investigated.
METHODS—As part of a quality of life study, 150 adults with clinically definite multiple sclerosis were interviewed, using a structured questionnaire, to determine their current use of outpatient and community services and the home modifications in place. Disability, handicap, and emotional status were also measured.
RESULTS—Forty five per cent of people did not receive any community services other than contact with their general practitioner. Thirty nine per cent of people with moderate and 12% with severe disability failed to receive community services. For the services received: 17% had contact with a community nurse; 33% with a care attendant or home help; 23% with a physiotherapist, 21% with an occupational therapist, and 10% with a social worker. Fifty eight per cent of people had modifications to their home as a direct result of multiple sclerosis. The relation between level of disability and number of services and adaptations received was moderate (r=0.58 and 0.54 respectively) and the relation between level of services and age (r=0.12), living alone (r=0.16), and emotional status (r=0.10) was negligible.
CONCLUSIONS—Despite a shift of emphasis from hospital to community care, and the establishment of standards of care for multiple sclerosis, many people with moderate or severe disability fail to receive assistance. These results provide evidence to support the dissatisfaction felt by people with multiple sclerosis in relation to the services they receive. It raises questions about equitable allocation of resources and highlights the urgent need for a review of community services.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bourdette D. N., Prochazka A. V., Mitchell W., Licari P., Burks J. Health care costs of veterans with multiple sclerosis: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. VA Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation Study Group. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Jan;74(1):26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Carton H., Loos R., Pacolet J., Versieck K., Vlietinck R. Utilisation and cost of professional care and assistance according to disability of patients with multiple sclerosis in Flanders (Belgium) J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;64(4):444–450. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.4.444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. England M. J., Goff V. V. Health reform and organized systems of care. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1993 Fall;(59):5–12. doi: 10.1002/yd.23319935903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freeman J. A., Hobart J. C., Langdon D. W., Thompson A. J. Clinical appropriateness: a key factor in outcome measure selection: the 36 item short form health survey in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Feb;68(2):150–156. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.68.2.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurtzke J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444–1452. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Phillips V. L. Community care for severely disabled people on low incomes. BMJ. 1995 Oct 28;311(7013):1121–1123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rawlins M. In pursuit of quality: the National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Lancet. 1999 Mar 27;353(9158):1079–1082. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02381-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stolp-Smith K. A., Atkinson E. J., Campion M. E., O'Brien P. C., Rodriguez M. Health care utilization in multiple sclerosis: a population-based study in Olmsted County, MN. Neurology. 1998 Jun;50(6):1594–1600. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.6.1594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weinshenker B. G. Natural history of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1994;36 (Suppl):S6–11. doi: 10.1002/ana.410360704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Williams M. H., Bowie C. Evidence of unmet need in the care of severely physically disabled adults. BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):95–98. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6870.95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES