Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2001 Feb;70(2):174–179. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.2.174

Controlled randomised crossover trial of the effects of physiotherapy on mobility in chronic multiple sclerosis

C Wiles 1, R Newcombe 1, K Fuller 1, S Shaw 1, J Furnival-Doran 1, T Pickersgill 1, A Morgan 1
PMCID: PMC1737210  PMID: 11160464

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To determine whether physiotherapy can improve mobility in chronic multiple sclerosis and whether there is a difference between treatment at home and as a hospital outpatient?
METHODS—A randomised controlled crossover trial was undertaken in patients with chronic multiple sclerosis who had difficulty walking and were referred from neurology clinics: allocation was to one of six permutations of three 8 week treatment periods separated by 8 week intervals: treatments consisted of physiotherapy at home, as an outpatient, or "no therapy". The main outcome measures were based on independent assessments at home and included mobility related disability (primary outcome: the Rivermead mobility index), gait impairments, arm function, mood, and subjective patient and carer ratings. Therapy was assessed by recording delivery, achievement of set targets, patient and carer preference, and cost.
RESULTS—On the Rivermead mobility index (scale 0-15) (primary outcome) there was a highly significant (p<0.001) treatment effect of 1.4-1.5 units favouring hospital or home based therapy over no therapy: this was supported by other measures of mobility, gait, balance, and the assessor's global "mobility change" score: there was no major difference between home and hospital. Carers preferred home treatment but neither they nor patients discerned greater benefit there. Estimated costs of home physiotherapy were £25/session and those at hospital were £18 (including £7 patient travel costs).
CONCLUSION—A course of physiotherapy is associated with improved mobility, subjective wellbeing, and improved mood in chronic multiple sclerosis compared with no treatment but benefit may only last a few weeks: there is little to choose between home and hospital based therapy but the first is more costly, mainly due to skilled staff travelling time.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (148.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brar S. P., Smith M. B., Nelson L. M., Franklin G. M., Cobble N. D. Evaluation of treatment protocols on minimal to moderate spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Mar;72(3):186–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collin C., Wade D. T., Davies S., Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–63. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forlander D. A., Bohannon R. W. Rivermead Mobility Index: a brief review of research to date. Clin Rehabil. 1999 Apr;13(2):97–100. doi: 10.1191/026921599675502264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Freeman J. A., Langdon D. W., Hobart J. C., Thompson A. J. Inpatient rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: do the benefits carry over into the community? Neurology. 1999 Jan 1;52(1):50–56. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.1.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Freeman J. A., Langdon D. W., Hobart J. C., Thompson A. J. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1997 Aug;42(2):236–244. doi: 10.1002/ana.410420216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Goodkin D. E., Hertsgaard D., Seminary J. Upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: improving assessment sensitivity with box-and-block and nine-hole peg tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Oct;69(10):850–854. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Holden M. K., Gill K. M., Magliozzi M. R., Nathan J., Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther. 1984 Jan;64(1):35–40. doi: 10.1093/ptj/64.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Katzman R., Brown T., Fuld P., Peck A., Schechter R., Schimmel H. Validation of a short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test of cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry. 1983 Jun;140(6):734–739. doi: 10.1176/ajp.140.6.734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kurtzke J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444–1452. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lord S. E., Wade D. T., Halligan P. W. A comparison of two physiotherapy treatment approaches to improve walking in multiple sclerosis: a pilot randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Dec;12(6):477–486. doi: 10.1191/026921598675863454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Newcombe R. G. Improved confidence intervals for the difference between binomial proportions based on paired data. Stat Med. 1998 Nov 30;17(22):2635–2650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Petajan J. H., Gappmaier E., White A. T., Spencer M. K., Mino L., Hicks R. W. Impact of aerobic training on fitness and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1996 Apr;39(4):432–441. doi: 10.1002/ana.410390405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Poser C. M., Paty D. W., Scheinberg L., McDonald W. I., Davis F. A., Ebers G. C., Johnson K. P., Sibley W. A., Silberberg D. H., Tourtellotte W. W. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227–231. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Siemonsma P. C., Walker M. F. Practical guidelines for independent assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1997 Nov;11(4):273–279. doi: 10.1177/026921559701100402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Solari A., Filippini G., Gasco P., Colla L., Salmaggi A., La Mantia L., Farinotti M., Eoli M., Mendozzi L. Physical rehabilitation has a positive effect on disability in multiple sclerosis patients. Neurology. 1999 Jan 1;52(1):57–62. doi: 10.1212/wnl.52.1.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Svensson B., Gerdle B., Elert J. Endurance training in patients with multiple sclerosis: five case studies. Phys Ther. 1994 Nov;74(11):1017–1026. doi: 10.1093/ptj/74.11.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Swingler R. J., Compston D. A. The morbidity of multiple sclerosis. Q J Med. 1992 Apr;83(300):325–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wade D. T., Legh-Smith J., Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7(4):176–181. doi: 10.3109/03790798509165991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES