Skip to main content
PMC home page
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1996 Jan;64(1):277–282. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.1.277-282.1996

Characterization of Tn917 insertion mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis affected in biofilm formation.

C Heilmann 1, C Gerke 1, F Perdreau-Remington 1, F Götz 1
PMCID: PMC173756  PMID: 8557351

Abstract

Biofilm formation is thought to result from the concerted action of primary attachment to a specific surface and accumulation in multilayered cell clusters. Here we describe the isolation and characterization of transposon (Tn917) mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis O-47 which were biofilm negative in the polystyrene microtiter plate assay. Among 5,000 Tn917 insertion mutants, 4 biofilm-negative mutants were isolated. Each mutant carried one copy of Tn917. The mutants were divided into two phenotypic classes: class A (mut1 and mut1a) and class B (mut2 and mut2a). Mutants of phenotypic class A lacked four cell surface proteins, were less hydrophobic, and were affected in primary attachment to polystyrene, but were still able to form multilayered cell clusters. They were able to form a biofilm on a glass surface, a trait that was even more pronounced than in the wild-type stain O-47. Loss of several surface proteins might have led to the reduced surface hydrophilic structures, thus favoring primary attachment to a glass surface and leading to subsequent biofilm formation. Mutants of phenotype class B were able to attach to polystyrene but were unable to form multilayered cell clusters, had unchanged cell surface proteins and hydrophobicity, and were unable to form a biofilm on a glass surface, mut1 and mut2 could be complemented by wild-type DNA fragments containing the Tn917 insertion sites of mut1 and mut2, respectively. The complemented biofilm-positive clone mut1 (pRC20) produced a 60-kDa protein which is postulated to function as the adhesin for binding to plastic. The traits of binding to polystyrene and the ability to form multilayered cell clusters are phenotypically and genetically distinct.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (945.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Augustin J., Rosenstein R., Wieland B., Schneider U., Schnell N., Engelke G., Entian K. D., Götz F. Genetic analysis of epidermin biosynthetic genes and epidermin-negative mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Eur J Biochem. 1992 Mar 15;204(3):1149–1154. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16740.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brückner R., Wagner E., Götz F. Characterization of a sucrase gene from Staphylococcus xylosus. J Bacteriol. 1993 Feb;175(3):851–857. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.3.851-857.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christensen G. D., Barker L. P., Mawhinney T. P., Baddour L. M., Simpson W. A. Identification of an antigenic marker of slime production for Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 1990 Sep;58(9):2906–2911. doi: 10.1128/iai.58.9.2906-2911.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen G. D., Bisno A. L., Parisi J. T., McLaughlin B., Hester M. G., Luther R. W. Nosocomial septicemia due to multiply antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Ann Intern Med. 1982 Jan;96(1):1–10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-96-1-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Christensen G. D., Simpson W. A., Bisno A. L., Beachey E. H. Experimental foreign body infections in mice challenged with slime-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 1983 Apr;40(1):407–410. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.1.407-410.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen G. D., Simpson W. A., Younger J. J., Baddour L. M., Barrett F. F., Melton D. M., Beachey E. H. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):996–1006. doi: 10.1128/jcm.22.6.996-1006.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Franson T. R., Sheth N. K., Rose H. D., Sohnle P. G. Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria adherent to intravascular catheters. J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Sep;20(3):500–505. doi: 10.1128/jcm.20.3.500-505.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hogt A. H., Dankert J., Hulstaert C. E., Feijen J. Cell surface characteristics of coagulase-negative staphylococci and their adherence to fluorinated poly(ethylenepropylene). Infect Immun. 1986 Jan;51(1):294–301. doi: 10.1128/iai.51.1.294-301.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hussain M., Wilcox M. H., White P. J. The slime of coagulase-negative staphylococci: biochemistry and relation to adherence. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993 Apr;10(3-4):191–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb05867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johnson G. M., Lee D. A., Regelmann W. E., Gray E. D., Peters G., Quie P. G. Interference with granulocyte function by Staphylococcus epidermidis slime. Infect Immun. 1986 Oct;54(1):13–20. doi: 10.1128/iai.54.1.13-20.1986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laemmli U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970 Aug 15;227(5259):680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ludwicka A., Jansen B., Wadström T., Pulverer G. Attachment of staphylococci to various synthetic polymers. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1984 Apr;256(4):479–489. doi: 10.1016/s0174-3031(84)80024-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mack D., Nedelmann M., Krokotsch A., Schwarzkopf A., Heesemann J., Laufs R. Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production: genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing polysaccharide intercellular adhesin. Infect Immun. 1994 Aug;62(8):3244–3253. doi: 10.1128/iai.62.8.3244-3253.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muller E., Hübner J., Gutierrez N., Takeda S., Goldmann D. A., Pier G. B. Isolation and characterization of transposon mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis deficient in capsular polysaccharide/adhesin and slime. Infect Immun. 1993 Feb;61(2):551–558. doi: 10.1128/iai.61.2.551-558.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Novick R. P., Bouanchaud D. The problems of drug-resistant pathogenic bacteria. Extrachromosomal nature of drug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1971 Jun 11;182:279–294. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1971.tb30664.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pascual A., Fleer A., Westerdaal N. A., Verhoef J. Modulation of adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to Teflon catheters in vitro. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1986 Oct;5(5):518–522. doi: 10.1007/BF02017694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Patrick C. C., Plaunt M. R., Hetherington S. V., May S. M. Role of the Staphylococcus epidermidis slime layer in experimental tunnel tract infections. Infect Immun. 1992 Apr;60(4):1363–1367. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.4.1363-1367.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Peters G., Locci R., Pulverer G. Adherence and growth of coagulase-negative staphylococci on surfaces of intravenous catheters. J Infect Dis. 1982 Oct;146(4):479–482. doi: 10.1093/infdis/146.4.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peters G., Locci R., Pulverer G. Microbial colonization of prosthetic devices. II. Scanning electron microscopy of naturally infected intravenous catheters. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B. 1981;173(5):293–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Peters G., Saborowski F., Locci R., Pulverer G. Investigations on staphylococcal infection of transvenous endocardial pacemaker electrodes. Am Heart J. 1984 Aug;108(2):359–365. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90625-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pfaller M., Davenport D., Bale M., Barrett M., Koontz F., Massanari R. M. Development of the quantitative micro-test for slime production by coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1988 Feb;7(1):30–33. doi: 10.1007/BF01962167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pulverer G., Peters G., Schumacher-Perdreau F. Coagulase-negative staphylococci. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A. 1987 Apr;264(1-2):1–28. doi: 10.1016/s0176-6724(87)80120-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Rosenstein R., Peschel A., Wieland B., Götz F. Expression and regulation of the antimonite, arsenite, and arsenate resistance operon of Staphylococcus xylosus plasmid pSX267. J Bacteriol. 1992 Jun;174(11):3676–3683. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.11.3676-3683.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rupp M. E., Archer G. L. Hemagglutination and adherence to plastic by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Infect Immun. 1992 Oct;60(10):4322–4327. doi: 10.1128/iai.60.10.4322-4327.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schumacher-Perdreau F., Heilmann C., Peters G., Götz F., Pulverer G. Comparative analysis of a biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis strain and its adhesion-positive, accumulation-negative mutant M7. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1994 Mar 15;117(1):71–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1994.tb06744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Timmerman C. P., Fleer A., Besnier J. M., De Graaf L., Cremers F., Verhoef J. Characterization of a proteinaceous adhesin of Staphylococcus epidermidis which mediates attachment to polystyrene. Infect Immun. 1991 Nov;59(11):4187–4192. doi: 10.1128/iai.59.11.4187-4192.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tojo M., Yamashita N., Goldmann D. A., Pier G. B. Isolation and characterization of a capsular polysaccharide adhesin from Staphylococcus epidermidis. J Infect Dis. 1988 Apr;157(4):713–722. doi: 10.1093/infdis/157.4.713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES