Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2001 Dec;71(6):762–771. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.762

Metabolic and electrophysiological validation of functional MRI

T Krings 1, M Schreckenberger 1, V Rohde 1, H Foltys 1, U Spetzger 1, O Sabri 1, M Reinges 1, S Kemeny 1, P Meyer 1, W Moller-Hartmann 1, M Korinth 1, J Gilsbach 1, U Buell 1, A Thron 1
PMCID: PMC1737624  PMID: 11723198

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Although functional MRI is widely used for preoperative planning and intraoperative neuronavigation, its accuracy to depict the site of neuronal activity is not exactly known. Experience with methods that may validate fMRI data and the results obtained when coregistering fMRI with different preoperative and intraoperative mapping modalities including metabolically based 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, electrophysiologcally based transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS) are described.
METHODS—Fifty patients were included. PET was performed in 30, TMS in 10, and DECS in 41 patients. After coregistration using a frameless stereotactic system, results were grouped into overlapping (<1 cm distance), neighbouring (<2 cm), or contradictory (>2 cm).
RESULTS—Comparing fMRI with PET, 18 overlapping, seven neighbouring, and one contradictory result were obtained. In four patients no comparison was possible (because of motion artefacts, low signal to noise ratio, and unusual high tumour metabolism in PET). The comparison of TMS and fMRI showed seven overlapping and three neighbouring results. In three patients no DECS results could be obtained. Of the remaining 38 patients, fMRI hand motor tasks were compared with DECS results of the upper limb muscles in 36patients, and fMRI foot motor tasks were compared with DECS results of the lower limb on 13 occasions. Of those 49 studies, overlapping results were obtained in 31 patients, and neighbouring in 14.On four occasions fMRI did not show functional information (because of motion artefacts and low signal to noise).
CONCLUSIONS—All validation techniques have intrinsic limitations that restrict their spatial resolution. However, of 50 investigated patients, there was only one in whom results contradictory to fMRI were obtained. Although it is not thought that fMRI can replace the intraoperatively updated functional information (DECS), it is concluded that fMRI is an important adjunct in the preoperative assessment of patients with tumours in the vicinity of the central region.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (340.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Achten E., Jackson G. D., Cameron J. A., Abbott D. F., Stella D. L., Fabinyi G. C. Presurgical evaluation of the motor hand area with functional MR imaging in patients with tumors and dysplastic lesions. Radiology. 1999 Feb;210(2):529–538. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.2.r99ja31529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alkadhi H., Kollias S. S., Crelier G. R., Golay X., Hepp-Reymond M. C., Valavanis A. Plasticity of the human motor cortex in patients with arteriovenous malformations: a functional MR imaging study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000 Sep;21(8):1423–1433. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bittar R. G., Olivier A., Sadikot A. F., Andermann F., Comeau R. M., Cyr M., Peters T. M., Reutens D. C. Localization of somatosensory function by using positron emission tomography scanning: a comparison with intraoperative cortical stimulation. J Neurosurg. 1999 Mar;90(3):478–483. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bittar R. G., Olivier A., Sadikot A. F., Andermann F., Reutens D. C. Cortical motor and somatosensory representation: effect of cerebral lesions. J Neurosurg. 2000 Feb;92(2):242–248. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.2.0242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boroojerdi B., Foltys H., Krings T., Spetzger U., Thron A., Töpper R. Localization of the motor hand area using transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;110(4):699–704. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brasil-Neto J. P., Cohen L. G., Panizza M., Nilsson J., Roth B. J., Hallett M. Optimal focal transcranial magnetic activation of the human motor cortex: effects of coil orientation, shape of the induced current pulse, and stimulus intensity. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):132–136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brasil-Neto J. P., McShane L. M., Fuhr P., Hallett M., Cohen L. G. Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;85(1):9–16. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90095-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cedzich C., Taniguchi M., Schäfer S., Schramm J. Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery. 1996 May;38(5):962–970. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen L. G., Bandinelli S., Topka H. R., Fuhr P., Roth B. J., Hallett M. Topographic maps of human motor cortex in normal and pathological conditions: mirror movements, amputations and spinal cord injuries. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:36–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cosgrove G. R., Buchbinder B. R., Jiang H. Functional magnetic resonance imaging for intracranial navigation. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1996 Apr;7(2):313–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Day B. L., Thompson P. D., Dick J. P., Nakashima K., Marsden C. D. Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Neurosci Lett. 1987 Mar 20;75(1):101–106. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Delbeke D., Meyerowitz C., Lapidus R. L., Maciunas R. J., Jennings M. T., Moots P. L., Kessler R. M. Optimal cutoff levels of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the differentiation of low-grade from high-grade brain tumors with PET. Radiology. 1995 Apr;195(1):47–52. doi: 10.1148/radiology.195.1.7892494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Duncan J. D., Moss S. D., Bandy D. J., Manwaring K., Kaplan A. M., Reiman E. M., Chen K., Lawson M. A., Wodrich D. L. Use of positron emission tomography for presurgical localization of eloquent brain areas in children with seizures. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997 Mar;26(3):144–156. doi: 10.1159/000121180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fandino J., Kollias S. S., Wieser H. G., Valavanis A., Yonekawa Y. Intraoperative validation of functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical reorganization patterns in patients with brain tumors involving the primary motor cortex. J Neurosurg. 1999 Aug;91(2):238–250. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.2.0238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fox P. T., Raichle M. E. Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Feb;83(4):1140–1144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.83.4.1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Frahm J., Merboldt K. D., Hänicke W., Kleinschmidt A., Boecker H. Brain or vein--oxygenation or flow? On signal physiology in functional MRI of human brain activation. NMR Biomed. 1994 Mar;7(1-2):45–53. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1940070108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hajnal J. V., Bydder G. M., Young I. R. fMRI: does correlation imply activation? NMR Biomed. 1995 May;8(3):97–100. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1940080303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Henneman E., Somjen G., Carpenter D. O. Excitability and inhibitability of motoneurons of different sizes. J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28(3):599–620. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Herholz K., Pietrzyk U., Karbe H., Würker M., Wienhard K., Heiss W. D. Individual metabolic anatomy of repeating words demonstrated by MRI-guided positron emission tomography. Neurosci Lett. 1994 Nov 21;182(1):47–50. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90202-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hill D. L., Smith A. D., Simmons A., Maurer C. R., Jr, Cox T. C., Elwes R., Brammer M., Hawkes D. J., Polkey C. E. Sources of error in comparing functional magnetic resonance imaging and invasive electrophysiological recordings. J Neurosurg. 2000 Aug;93(2):214–223. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.93.2.0214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Ibáez V., Deiber M. P., Sadato N., Toro C., Grissom J., Woods R. P., Mazziotta J. C., Hallett M. Effects of stimulus rate on regional cerebral blood flow after median nerve stimulation. Brain. 1995 Oct;118(Pt 5):1339–1351. doi: 10.1093/brain/118.5.1339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jueptner M., Weiller C. Review: does measurement of regional cerebral blood flow reflect synaptic activity? Implications for PET and fMRI. Neuroimage. 1995 Jun;2(2):148–156. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaplan A. M., Bandy D. J., Manwaring K. H., Chen K., Lawson M. A., Moss S. D., Duncan J. D., Wodrich D. L., Schnur J. A., Reiman E. M. Functional brain mapping using positron emission tomography scanning in preoperative neurosurgical planning for pediatric brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 1999 Nov;91(5):797–803. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.5.0797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kiers L., Clouston P., Chiappa K. H., Cros D. Assessment of cortical motor output: compound muscle action potential versus twitch force recording. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Apr;97(2):131–139. doi: 10.1016/0924-980x(94)00325-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Krings T., Buchbinder B. R., Butler W. E., Chiappa K. H., Jiang H. J., Cosgrove G. R., Rosen B. R. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation: complementary approaches in the evaluation of cortical motor function. Neurology. 1997 May;48(5):1406–1416. doi: 10.1212/wnl.48.5.1406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Krings T., Buchbinder B. R., Butler W. E., Chiappa K. H., Jiang H. J., Rosen B. R., Cosgrove G. R. Stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation: correlation with direct electrical cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1997 Dec;41(6):1319–1326. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199712000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Krings T., Erberich S. G., Roessler F., Reul J., Thron A. MR blood oxygenation level-dependent signal differences in parenchymal and large draining vessels: implications for functional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;20(10):1907–1914. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Krings T., Naujokat C., von Keyserlingk D. G. Representation of cortical motor function as revealed by stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;109(2):85–93. doi: 10.1016/s0924-980x(97)00078-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Krings T., Reinges M. H., Erberich S., Kemeny S., Rohde V., Spetzger U., Korinth M., Willmes K., Gilsbach J. M., Thron A. Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;70(6):749–760. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.6.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Krings T., Reul J., Spetzger U., Klusmann A., Roessler F., Gilsbach J. M., Thron A. Functional magnetic resonance mapping of sensory motor cortex for image-guided neurosurgical intervention. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(3):215–222. doi: 10.1007/s007010050088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kwong K. K. Functional magnetic resonance imaging with echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Q. 1995 Mar;11(1):1–20. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee C. C., Ward H. A., Sharbrough F. W., Meyer F. B., Marsh W. R., Raffel C., So E. L., Cascino G. D., Shin C., Xu Y. Assessment of functional MR imaging in neurosurgical planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Sep;20(8):1511–1519. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Lehéricy S., Duffau H., Cornu P., Capelle L., Pidoux B., Carpentier A., Auliac S., Clemenceau S., Sichez J. P., Bitar A. Correspondence between functional magnetic resonance imaging somatotopy and individual brain anatomy of the central region: comparison with intraoperative stimulation in patients with brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 2000 Apr;92(4):589–598. doi: 10.3171/jns.2000.92.4.0589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Levy W. J., Amassian V. E., Schmid U. D., Jungreis C. Mapping of motor cortex gyral sites non-invasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects and patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:51–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Maurer C. R., Jr, Hill D. L., Martin A. J., Liu H., McCue M., Rueckert D., Lloret D., Hall W. A., Maxwell R. E., Hawkes D. J. Investigation of intraoperative brain deformation using a 1.5-T interventional MR system: preliminary results. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Oct;17(5):817–825. doi: 10.1109/42.736050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Meyer P. T., Schreckenberger M., Spetzger U., Meyer G. F., Sabri O., Setani K. S., Zeggel T., Buell U. Comparison of visual and ROI-based brain tumour grading using 18F-FDG PET: ROC analyses. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001 Feb;28(2):165–174. doi: 10.1007/s002590000428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nitschke M. F., Melchert U. H., Hahn C., Otto V., Arnold H., Herrmann H. D., Nowak G., Westphal M., Wessel K. Preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the motor system in patients with tumours in the parietal lobe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1998;140(12):1223–1229. doi: 10.1007/s007010050242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nudo R. J., Wise B. M., SiFuentes F., Milliken G. W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996 Jun 21;272(5269):1791–1794. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5269.1791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Pietrzyk U., Herholz K., Fink G., Jacobs A., Mielke R., Slansky I., Würker M., Heiss W. D. An interactive technique for three-dimensional image registration: validation for PET, SPECT, MRI and CT brain studies. J Nucl Med. 1994 Dec;35(12):2011–2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Puce A., Constable R. T., Luby M. L., McCarthy G., Nobre A. C., Spencer D. D., Gore J. C., Allison T. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of sensory and motor cortex: comparison with electrophysiological localization. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):262–270. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pujol J., Conesa G., Deus J., López-Obarrio L., Isamat F., Capdevila A. Clinical application of functional magnetic resonance imaging in presurgical identification of the central sulcus. J Neurosurg. 1998 May;88(5):863–869. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.5.0863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schreckenberger M., Spetzger U., Sabri O., Meyer P. T., Zeggel T., Zimny M., Gilsbach J., Buell U. Localisation of motor areas in brain tumour patients: a comparison of preoperative [18F]FDG-PET and intraoperative cortical electrostimulation. Eur J Nucl Med. 2001 Sep;28(9):1394–1403. doi: 10.1007/s002590100582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schreckenberger M., Spetzger U., Sabri O., Meyer P., Schulz G., Hermanns B., Krombach G., Gilsbach J., Buell U. Preoperative PET activation for assessment of motor cortex area in precentral chondroma. Surg Neurol. 1999 Jul;52(1):24–29. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00035-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Schulder M., Maldjian J. A., Liu W. C., Holodny A. I., Kalnin A. T., Mun I. K., Carmel P. W. Functional image-guided surgery of intracranial tumors located in or near the sensorimotor cortex. J Neurosurg. 1998 Sep;89(3):412–418. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.3.0412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Spetzger U., Laborde G., Gilsbach J. M. Frameless neuronavigation in modern neurosurgery. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1995 Dec;38(4):163–166. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1053478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Taniguchi M., Cedzich C., Schramm J. Modification of cortical stimulation for motor evoked potentials under general anesthesia: technical description. Neurosurgery. 1993 Feb;32(2):219–226. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199302000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Viñas F. C., Zamorano L., Mueller R. A., Jiang Z., Chugani H., Fuerst D., Muzik O., Mangner T. J., Diaz F. G. [15O]-water PET and intraoperative brain mapping: a comparison in the localization of eloquent cortex. Neurol Res. 1997 Dec;19(6):601–608. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1997.11740867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wassermann E. M., McShane L. M., Hallett M., Cohen L. G. Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Feb;85(1):1–8. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(92)90094-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Yoshiura T., Hasuo K., Mihara F., Masuda K., Morioka T., Fukui M. Increased activity of the ipsilateral motor cortex during a hand motor task in patients with brain tumor and paresis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997 May;18(5):865–869. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES