Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2001 Dec;71(6):732–740. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.732

Prevention of spinal cord injury with time-frequency analysis of evoked potentials: an experimental study

Y Hu 1, K Luk 1, W Lu 1, A Holmes 1, J Leong 1
PMCID: PMC1737639  PMID: 11723192

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To verify the applicability and validity of time-frequency analysis (TFA) of evoked potential (EP) signals in detecting the integrity of spinal cord function and preventing spinal cord injury.
METHODS—The spinal cord was simulated during surgery in 20 mature rats by mechanically damaging the spinal cord. Cortical somatosensory evoked potential (CSEP), spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), cortical motor evoked potential (CMEP), and spinal cord evoked potential (SCEP) were used to monitor spinal cord function. Short time Fourier transform (STFT) was applied to the CSEP signal, and cone shaped distribution (CSD) was used as the TFA algorithm for SSEP, CMEP, and SCEP signals. The changes in the latency and amplitude of EP signals were measured in the time domain, and peak time, peak frequency, and peak power were measured in the time-frequency distribution (TFD).
RESULTS—The TFDs of EPs were found to concentrate in a certain location under normal conditions. When injury occurred, the energy decreased in peak power, and there was a greater dispersion of energy across the time-frequency range. Strong relations were found between latency and peak time, and amplitude and peak power. However, the change in peak power after injury was significantly larger than the corresponding change in amplitude (p<0.001 by ANOVA).
CONCLUSIONS—It was found that TFA of EPs provided an earlier and more sensitive indication of injury than time domain monitoring alone. It is suggested that TFA of EP signals should therefore be useful in preventing spinal cord injury during surgery.



Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (311.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black P., Markowitz R. S., Cooper V., Mechanic A., Kushner H., Damjanov I., Finkelstein S. D., Wachs K. C. Models of spinal cord injury: Part 1. Static load technique. Neurosurgery. 1986 Nov;19(5):752–762. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198611000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brauna J. C., Hanley D. F., Thakor N. V. Detection of neurological injury using time-frequency analysis of the somatosensory evoked potential. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Jul;100(4):310–318. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(96)95115-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Deutsch H., Arginteanu M., Manhart K., Perin N., Camins M., Moore F., Steinberger A. A., Weisz D. J. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in anterior thoracic vertebrectomy. J Neurosurg. 2000 Apr;92(2 Suppl):155–161. doi: 10.3171/spi.2000.92.2.0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forbes H. J., Allen P. W., Waller C. S., Jones S. J., Edgar M. A., Webb P. J., Ransford A. O. Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 May;73(3):487–491. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B3.1670455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Geisler F. H., Dorsey F. C., Coleman W. P. Recovery of motor function after spinal-cord injury--a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with GM-1 ganglioside. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 27;324(26):1829–1838. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106273242601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Guérit J. M. Neuromonitoring in the operating room: why, when, and how to monitor? Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jan;106(1):1–21. doi: 10.1016/s0013-4694(97)00077-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haghighi S. S., York D. H., Gaines R. W., Oro J. J. Monitoring of motor tracts with spinal cord stimulation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Jul 1;19(13):1518–1524. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199407000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Herdmann J., Deletis V., Edmonds H. L., Jr, Morota N. Spinal cord and nerve root monitoring in spine surgery and related procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Apr 1;21(7):879–885. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199604010-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hiraizumi Y., Transfeldt E. E., Kawahara N., Yamada H. Differences in sensitivity between magnetic motor-evoked potentials and somatosensory-evoked potentials in experimental spinal cord lesions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Oct 1;21(19):2190–2196. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199610010-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Imai M., Harada Y., Atsuta Y., Takemitsu Y., Iwahara T. Automated spinal cord monitoring for spinal surgery. Paraplegia. 1989 Jun;27(3):204–211. doi: 10.1038/sc.1989.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kakulas B. A. Pathology of spinal injuries. Cent Nerv Syst Trauma. 1984 Winter;1(2):117–129. doi: 10.1089/cns.1984.1.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Khan M., Griebel R. Acute spinal cord injury in the rat: comparison of three experimental techniques. Can J Neurol Sci. 1983 Aug;10(3):161–165. doi: 10.1017/s031716710004484x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kojima Y., Yamamoto T., Ogino H., Okada K., Ono K. Evoked spinal potentials as a monitor of spinal cord viability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1979 Nov-Dec;4(6):471–477. doi: 10.1097/00007632-197911000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Koyanagi I., Iwasaki Y., Isu T., Abe H., Akino M., Kuroda S. Spinal cord evoked potential monitoring after spinal cord stimulation during surgery of spinal cord tumors. Neurosurgery. 1993 Sep;33(3):451–460. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199309000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Loder R. T., Thomson G. J., LaMont R. L. Spinal cord monitoring in patients with nonidiopathic spinal deformities using somatosensory evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991 Dec;16(12):1359–1364. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199112000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Machida M., Weinstein S. L., Imamura Y., Usui T., Yamada T., Kimura J., Toriyama S. Compound muscle action potentials and spinal evoked potentials in experimental spine maneuver. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989 Jul;14(7):687–691. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198907000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nuwer M. R., Dawson E. G., Carlson L. G., Kanim L. E., Sherman J. E. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;96(1):6–11. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00235-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nyström B., Berglund J. E. Spinal cord restitution following compression injuries in rats. Acta Neurol Scand. 1988 Dec;78(6):467–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1988.tb03689.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Owen J. H., Jenny A. B., Naito M., Weber K., Bridwell K. H., McGhee R. Effects of spinal cord lesioning on somatosensory and neurogenic-motor evoked potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989 Jul;14(7):673–682. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198907000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Papastefanou S. L., Henderson L. M., Smith N. J., Hamilton A., Webb J. K. Surface electrode somatosensory-evoked potentials in spinal surgery: implications for indications and practice. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Oct 1;25(19):2467–2472. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010010-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rivlin A. S., Tator C. H. Effect of duration of acute spinal cord compression in a new acute cord injury model in the rat. Surg Neurol. 1978 Jul;10(1):38–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Taoka Y., Okajima K. Spinal cord injury in the rat. Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Oct;56(3):341–358. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(98)00049-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tator C. H. Spine-spinal cord relationships in spinal cord trauma. Clin Neurosurg. 1983;30:479–494. doi: 10.1093/neurosurgery/30.cn_suppl_1.479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thakor N. V., Guo X. R., Sun Y. C., Hanley D. F. Multiresolution wavelet analysis of evoked potentials. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993 Nov;40(11):1085–1094. doi: 10.1109/10.245625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Thakor N. V., Vaz C. A., McPherson R. W., Hanley D. F. Adaptive Fourier series modeling of time-varying evoked potentials: study of human somatosensory evoked response to etomidate anesthetic. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar-Apr;80(2):108–118. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90148-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Wagner W., Peghini-Halbig L., Mäurer J. C., Perneczky A. Intraoperative SEP monitoring in neurosurgery around the brain stem and cervical spinal cord: differential recording of subcortical components. J Neurosurg. 1994 Aug;81(2):213–220. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.81.2.0213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wilson-Holden T. J., Padberg A. M., Lenke L. G., Larson B. J., Bridwell K. H., Bassett G. S. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 Aug 15;24(16):1685–1692. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199908150-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilson-Holden T. J., Padberg A. M., Parkinson J. D., Bridwell K. H., Lenke L. G., Bassett G. S. A prospective comparison of neurogenic mixed evoked potential stimulation methods: utility of epidural elicitation during posterior spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Sep 15;25(18):2364–2371. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zentner J. Motor evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations on the spinal cord. Neurosurg Rev. 1991;14(1):29–36. doi: 10.1007/BF00338189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Zouridakis G., Papanicolaou A. C., Simos P. G. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Part 1: General overview. J Clin Eng. 1997 Sep-Oct;22(5):316–320. doi: 10.1097/00004669-199709000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. al-Mefty O., Harkey H. L., Marawi I., Haines D. E., Peeler D. F., Wilner H. I., Smith R. R., Holaday H. R., Haining J. L., Russell W. F. Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 1993 Oct;79(4):550–561. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.79.4.0550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. de Gauzy J. S., Roux F. E., Henry P., Cahuzac J. P. Potentiels évoqués somesthésiques au cours de la chirurgie de la scoliose: intérêt du recueil épidural. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1999 Jul;85(4):387–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. el-Negamy E., Sedgwick E. M. Properties of a spinal somatosensory evoked potential recorded in man. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Aug;41(8):762–768. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.8.762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES