Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2002 Feb;72(2):193–202. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.2.193

Community based rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial

J Powell 1, J Heslin 1, R Greenwood 1
PMCID: PMC1737759  PMID: 11796769

Abstract

Objective: Evaluation of multidisciplinary community based outreach rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).

Methods: A randomised controlled trial compared outreach treatment (mean of two sessions a week for 27.3 (SD 19.1) weeks) in community settings such as participants' homes, day centres, or workplaces, with provision of written information detailing alternative resources. Follow up for an average of 24.8 months after initial allocation was by a blinded independent assessor. Participants were aged 16–65, had sustained severe TBI between 3 months and 20 years previously, and had no other neurological conditions. Of 110 initially allocated, 48 outreach and 46 information participants were successfully followed up. Primary outcome measures (Barthel index (BI) and the brain injury community rehabilitation outcome-39 (BICRO-39)) focused on levels of activity and participation. Secondary measures were the functional independence measure and the functional assessment measure (FIM+FAM) and, in a subgroup of 46 participants, the hospital anxiety and depression scale. Analyses were non-parametric.

Results: outreach participants were significantly more likely to show gains on the BI and the BICRO-39 total score and self organisation and psychological wellbeing subscales. There were likewise strong trends (p<0.10) for BICRO personal care and mobility, and on the FIM+FAM for personal care and cognitive functions. Differential improvements were not seen for indices of socialising, productive employment, anxiety, or depression. Median changes on individual subscales were small, reflecting the diversity of the clinical population; however, 40% of outreach but only 20% of information participants made a clinically significant improvement of 2+ points on at least one BICRO-39 scale. Time since injury was unrelated to the magnitude of gains.

Conclusions: This is the first RCT of multidisciplinary community rehabilitation after severe TBI, and suggests that even years after injury it can yield benefits which outlive the active treatment period.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (196.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alcott D., Dixon K., Swann R. The reliability of the items of the Functional Assessment Measure (FAM): differences in abstractness between FAM items. Disabil Rehabil. 1997 Sep;19(9):355–358. doi: 10.3109/09638289709166551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brooks N. The effectiveness of post-acute rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1991 Apr-Jun;5(2):103–109. doi: 10.3109/02699059109008082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Collin C., Wade D. T., Davies S., Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61–63. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale--a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res. 1997 Jan;42(1):17–41. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00216-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Johnson G., Burvill P. W., Anderson C. S., Jamrozik K., Stewart-Wynne E. G., Chakera T. M. Screening instruments for depression and anxiety following stroke: experience in the Perth community stroke study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1995 Apr;91(4):252–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1995.tb09778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McMillan T. M., Jongen E. L., Greenwood R. J. Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: retrospective or prospective? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;60(4):422–427. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.4.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McPherson K. M., Pentland B., Cudmore S. F., Prescott R. J. An inter-rater reliability study of the Functional Assessment Measure (FIM+FAM). Disabil Rehabil. 1996 Jul;18(7):341–347. doi: 10.3109/09638289609165892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Powell J. H., Beckers K., Greenwood R. J. Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument--the BICRO-39 scales. Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Oct;79(10):1213–1225. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90265-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Spinhoven P., Ormel J., Sloekers P. P., Kempen G. I., Speckens A. E., Van Hemert A. M. A validation study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in different groups of Dutch subjects. Psychol Med. 1997 Mar;27(2):363–370. doi: 10.1017/s0033291796004382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stilwell P., Stilwell J., Hawley C., Davies C. Measuring outcome in community-based rehabilitation services for people who have suffered traumatic brain injury: the Community Outcome Scale. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Dec;12(6):521–531. doi: 10.1191/026921598673761855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stonnington H. H. Community based rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 1997 Feb;11(2):155–155. doi: 10.1080/026990597123755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sutcliffe L. M., Lincoln N. B. The assessment of depression in aphasic stroke patients: the development of the Stroke Aphasic Depression Questionnaire. Clin Rehabil. 1998 Dec;12(6):506–513. doi: 10.1191/026921598672167702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wade D. T., King N. S., Wenden F. J., Crawford S., Caldwell F. E. Routine follow up after head injury: a second randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Aug;65(2):177–183. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.65.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wehman P., Sherron P., Kregel J., Kreutzer J., Tran S., Cifu D. Return to work for persons following severe traumatic brain injury. Supported employment outcomes after five years. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Dec;72(6):355–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Willer B., Button J., Rempel R. Residential and home-based postacute rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: a case control study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Apr;80(4):399–406. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90276-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Zigmond A. S., Snaith R. P. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES