Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2002 Mar;72(3):315–324. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.3.315

Adaptation of handwriting size under distorted visual feedback in patients with Parkinson's disease and elderly and young controls

H Teulings 1, J Contreras-Vidal 1, G Stelmach 1, C Adler 1
PMCID: PMC1737792  PMID: 11861687

Abstract

Objective: The ability to use visual feedback to control handwriting size was compared in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), elderly people, and young adults to better understand factors playing a part in parkinsonian micrographia.

Methods: The participants wrote sequences of eight cursive l loops with visual target sizes of 0.5 and 2 cm on a flat panel display digitiser which both recorded and displayed the pen movements. In the pre-exposure and postexposure conditions, the display digitiser showed the actual pen trace in real time and real size. In the distortion exposure conditions, the gain of the vertical dimension of the visual feedback was either reduced to 70% or enlarged to 140%.

Results: The young controls showed a gradual visuomotor adaptation that compensated for the visual feedback distortions during the exposure conditions. They also showed significant after effects during the postexposure conditions. The elderly controls marginally corrected for the size distortions and showed small after effects. The patients with PD, however, showed no trial by trial adaptations or after effects but instead, a progressive amplification of the distortion effect in each individual trial.

Conclusion: The young controls used visual feedback to update their visuomotor map. The elderly controls seemed to make little use of visual feedback. The patients with Parkinson's disease rely on the visual feedback of previous or of ongoing strokes to programme subsequent strokes. This recursive feedback may play a part in the progressive reductions in handwriting size found in parkinsonian micrographia.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (214.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beuter A., Milton J. G., Labrie C., Glass L., Gauthier S. Delayed visual feedback and movement control in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 1990 Nov;110(2):228–235. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(90)90034-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burton A. W., Pick H. L., Jr, Holmes C., Teulings H. L. The independence of horizontal and vertical dimensions in handwriting with and without vision. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1990 Dec;75(3):201–212. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90012-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cooke J. D., Brown J. D., Brooks V. B. Increased dependence on visual information for movement control in patients with Parkinson's disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 1978 Nov;5(4):413–415. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100024197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Demirci M., Grill S., McShane L., Hallett M. A mismatch between kinesthetic and visual perception in Parkinson's disease. Ann Neurol. 1997 Jun;41(6):781–788. doi: 10.1002/ana.410410614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Diederich N. J., Goetz C. G., Raman R., Pappert E. J., Leurgans S., Piery V. Poor visual discrimination and visual hallucinations in Parkinson's disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1998 Sep-Oct;21(5):289–295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flash T., Inzelberg R., Schechtman E., Korczyn A. D. Kinematic analysis of upper limb trajectories in Parkinson's disease. Exp Neurol. 1992 Nov;118(2):215–226. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(92)90038-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fucetola R., Smith M. C. Distorted visual feedback effects on drawing in Parkinson's disease. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1997 Apr;95(3):255–266. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(96)00043-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Glickstein M., Stein J. Paradoxical movement in Parkinson's disease. Trends Neurosci. 1991 Nov;14(11):480–482. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(91)90055-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jobst E. E., Melnick M. E., Byl N. N., Dowling G. A., Aminoff M. J. Sensory perception in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol. 1997 Apr;54(4):450–454. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1997.00550160080020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kagerer F. A., Contreras-Vidal J. L., Stelmach G. E. Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Jul;115(3):557–561. doi: 10.1007/pl00005727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Klockgether T., Borutta M., Rapp H., Spieker S., Dichgans J. A defect of kinesthesia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 1995 Jul;10(4):460–465. doi: 10.1002/mds.870100410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Klockgether T., Dichgans J. Visual control of arm movement in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 1994 Jan;9(1):48–56. doi: 10.1002/mds.870090108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Maarse F. J., Thomassen A. J. Produced and perceived writing slant: difference between up and down strokes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1983 Oct;54(1-3):131–147. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(83)90028-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Margolin D. I., Wing A. M. Agraphia and micrographia: clinical manifestations of motor programming and performance disorders. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1983 Oct;54(1-3):263–283. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(83)90039-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marsden C. D., Obeso J. A. The functions of the basal ganglia and the paradox of stereotaxic surgery in Parkinson's disease. Brain. 1994 Aug;117(Pt 4):877–897. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.4.877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McLennan J. E., Nakano K., Tyler H. R., Schwab R. S. Micrographia in Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Sci. 1972 Feb;15(2):141–152. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(72)90002-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Poizner H., Fookson O. I., Berkinblit M. B., Hening W., Feldman G., Adamovich S. Pointing to remembered targets in 3-D space in Parkinson's disease. Motor Control. 1998 Jul;2(3):251–277. doi: 10.1123/mcj.2.3.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rickards C., Cody F. W. Proprioceptive control of wrist movements in Parkinson's disease. Reduced muscle vibration-induced errors. Brain. 1997 Jun;120(Pt 6):977–990. doi: 10.1093/brain/120.6.977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schneider J. S., Diamond S. G., Markham C. H. Parkinson's disease: sensory and motor problems in arms and hands. Neurology. 1987 Jun;37(6):951–956. doi: 10.1212/wnl.37.6.951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Seidler-Dobrin R. D., Stelmach G. E. Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Apr;119(4):467–474. doi: 10.1007/s002210050362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shadmehr R., Mussa-Ivaldi F. A. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208–3224. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-03208.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Teulings H. L., Schomaker L. R. Invariant properties between stroke features in handwriting. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1993 Mar;82(1-3):69–88. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(93)90005-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Vaillancourt D. E., Slifkin A. B., Newell K. M. Intermittency in the visual control of force in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res. 2001 May 1;138(1):118–127. doi: 10.1007/s002210100699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Verschueren S. M., Swinnen S. P., Dom R., De Weerdt W. Interlimb coordination in patients with Parkinson's disease: motor learning deficits and the importance of augmented information feedback. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Mar;113(3):497–508. doi: 10.1007/pl00005602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Galen G. P. Phonological and motoric demands in handwriting: evidence for discrete transmission of information. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1990 Aug;74(2-3):259–275. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(90)90008-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES