Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2002 Apr;72(4):473–479. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.4.473

Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial

G Kwakkel 1, B Kollen 1, R Wagenaar 1
PMCID: PMC1737834  PMID: 11909906

Abstract

Objective: To assess long term effects at 1 year after stroke in patients who participated in an upper and lower limb intensity training programme in the acute and subacute rehabilitation phases.

Design: A three group randomised controlled trial with repeated measures was used.

Method: One hundred and one patients with a primary middle cerebral artery stroke were randomly allocated to one of three groups for a 20 week rehabilitation programme with an emphasis on (1) upper limb function, (2) lower limb function or (3) immobilisation with an inflatable pressure splint (control group). Follow up assessments within and between groups were compared at 6, 9, and 12 months after stroke.

Results: No statistically significant effects were found for treatment assignment from 6 months onwards. At a group level, the significant differences in efficacy demonstrated at 20 weeks after stroke in favour of the lower limb remained. However, no significant differences in functional recovery between groups were found for Barthel index (BI), functional ambulation categories (FAC),action research arm test (ARAT), comfortable and maximal walking speed, Nottingham health profile part 1(NHP-part 1), sickness impact profile-68 (SIP-68), and Frenchay activities index (FAI) from 6 months onwards. At an individual subject level a substantial number of patients showed improvement or deterioration in upper limb function (n=8 and 5, respectively) and lower limb function (n=19 and 9, respectively). Activities of daily living (ADL) scores showed that five patients deteriorated and four improved beyond the error threshold from 6 months onwards. In particular, patients with some but incomplete functional recovery at 6 months are likely to continue to improve or regress from 6 months onwards.

Conclusions: On average patients maintained their functional gains for up to 1 year after stroke after receiving a 20 week upper or lower limb function training programme. However, a significant number of patients with incomplete recovery showed improvements or deterioration in dexterity, walking ability, and ADL beyond the error threshold.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (194.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andrews K., Brocklehurst J. C., Richards B., Laycock P. J. The rate of recovery from stroke - and its measurement. Int Rehabil Med. 1981;3(3):155–161. doi: 10.3109/03790798109166795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andrews K., Stewart J. Stroke recovery: he can but does he? Rheumatol Rehabil. 1979 Feb;18(1):43–48. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamford J., Sandercock P., Dennis M., Burn J., Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991 Jun 22;337(8756):1521–1526. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Beckerman, Vogelaar T. W., Lankhorst G. J., Verbeek A. L. A criterion for stability of the motor function of the lower extremity in stroke patients using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1996 Mar;28(1):3–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Collen F. M., Wade D. T., Bradshaw C. M. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud. 1990 Jan-Mar;12(1):6–9. doi: 10.3109/03790799009166594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Collin C., Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Jul;53(7):576–579. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.7.576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dam M., Tonin P., Casson S., Ermani M., Pizzolato G., Iaia V., Battistin L. The effects of long-term rehabilitation therapy on poststroke hemiplegic patients. Stroke. 1993 Aug;24(8):1186–1191. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.8.1186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidoff G. N., Keren O., Ring H., Solzi P. Acute stroke patients: long-term effects of rehabilitation and maintenance of gains. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Oct;72(11):869–873. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(91)90001-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dean C. M., Richards C. L., Malouin F. Task-related circuit training improves performance of locomotor tasks in chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):409–417. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.3839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dean C. M., Shepherd R. B. Task-related training improves performance of seated reaching tasks after stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1997 Apr;28(4):722–728. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.4.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Erdman R. A., Passchier J., Kooijman M., Stronks D. L. The Dutch version of the Nottingham Health Profile: investigations of psychometric aspects. Psychol Rep. 1993 Jun;72(3 Pt 1):1027–1035. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3.1027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guyatt G., Walter S., Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(2):171–178. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Holbrook M., Skilbeck C. E. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983 May;12(2):166–170. doi: 10.1093/ageing/12.2.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunt S. M., McKenna S. P., Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981 Dec;35(4):297–300. doi: 10.1136/jech.35.4.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Indredavik B., Bakke F., Slordahl S. A., Rokseth R., Hâheim L. L. Stroke unit treatment. 10-year follow-up. Stroke. 1999 Aug;30(8):1524–1527. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.8.1524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalra L., Crome P. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1993 Apr;41(4):396–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06947.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kwakkel G., Wagenaar R. C., Koelman T. W., Lankhorst G. J., Koetsier J. C. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997 Aug;28(8):1550–1556. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.8.1550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kwakkel G., Wagenaar R. C., Twisk J. W., Lankhorst G. J., Koetsier J. C. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999 Jul 17;354(9174):191–196. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)09477-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kwakkel G., van Dijk G. M., Wagenaar R. C. Accuracy of physical and occupational therapists' early predictions of recovery after severe middle cerebral artery stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2000 Feb;14(1):28–41. doi: 10.1191/026921500675130139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lyle R. C. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res. 1981;4(4):483–492. doi: 10.1097/00004356-198112000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Post M. W., de Bruin A., de Witte L., Schrijvers A. The SIP68: a measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 May;77(5):440–445. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90031-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Robichaud J. A., Agostinucci J., Vander Linden D. W. Effect of air-splint application on soleus muscle motoneuron reflex excitability in nondisabled subjects and subjects with cerebrovascular accidents. Phys Ther. 1992 Mar;72(3):176–185. doi: 10.1093/ptj/72.3.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Robinson-Smith G., Johnston M. V., Allen J. Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, and depression after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Apr;81(4):460–464. doi: 10.1053/mr.2000.3863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schuling J., de Haan R., Limburg M., Groenier K. H. The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke. 1993 Aug;24(8):1173–1177. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.8.1173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sivenius J., Pyörälä K., Heinonen O. P., Salonen J. T., Riekkinen P. The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke--a controlled trial. Stroke. 1985 Nov-Dec;16(6):928–931. doi: 10.1161/01.str.16.6.928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sunderland A., Fletcher D., Bradley L., Tinson D., Hewer R. L., Wade D. T. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;57(7):856–858. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.7.856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tangeman P. T., Banaitis D. A., Williams A. K. Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: changes in functional performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Oct;71(11):876–880. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taub E., Miller N. E., Novack T. A., Cook E. W., 3rd, Fleming W. C., Nepomuceno C. S., Connell J. S., Crago J. E. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):347–354. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Teasdale G., Murray G., Parker L., Jennett B. Adding up the Glasgow Coma Score. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1979;28(1):13–16. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-4088-8_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ungern-Sternberg A. V., Küthmann M., Weimann G. Stroke: evaluation of long-term rehabilitation effects. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1991;33:149–155. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-9135-4_23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wade D. T., Collen F. M., Robb G. F., Warlow C. P. Physiotherapy intervention late after stroke and mobility. BMJ. 1992 Mar 7;304(6827):609–613. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6827.609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Werner R. A., Kessler S. Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Mar-Apr;75(2):114–120. doi: 10.1097/00002060-199603000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. de Haan R., Limburg M., Schuling J., Broeshart J., Jonkers L., van Zuylen P. Klinimetrische evaluatie van de Barthel-index, een maat voor beperkingen in het dagelijks functioneren. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1993 May 1;137(18):917–921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. van der Lee J. H., Wagenaar R. C., Lankhorst G. J., Vogelaar T. W., Devillé W. L., Bouter L. M. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2369–2375. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.11.2369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES