Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2002 May;72(5):630–634. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.5.630

Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of lumbosacral nerve root compression

P Vroomen 1, M C T F M de Krom 1, J Wilmink 1, A Kester 1, J Knottnerus 1
PMCID: PMC1737860  PMID: 11971050

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate patient characteristics, symptoms, and examination findings in the clinical diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root compression causing sciatica.

Methods: The study involved 274 patients with pain radiating into the leg. All had a standardised clinical assessment and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The associations between patient characteristics, clinical findings, and lumbosacral nerve root compression on MR imaging were analysed.

Results: Nerve root compression was associated with three patient characteristics, three symptoms, and four physical examination findings (paresis, absence of tendon reflexes, a positive straight leg raising test, and increased finger-floor distance). Multivariate analysis, analysing the independent diagnostic value of the tests, showed that nerve root compression was predicted by two patient characteristics, four symptoms, and two signs (increased finger-floor distance and paresis). The straight leg raise test was not predictive. The area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristic was 0.80 for the history items. It increased to 0.83 when the physical examination items were added.

Conclusions: Various clinical findings were found to be associated with nerve root compression on MR imaging. While this set of findings agrees well with those commonly used in daily practice, the tests tended to have lower sensitivity and specificity than previously reported. Stepwise multivariate analysis showed that most of the diagnostic information revealed by physical examination findings had already been revealed by the history items.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Andersson G. B., Deyo R. A. History and physical examination in patients with herniated lumbar discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Dec 15;21(24 Suppl):10S–18S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612151-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersson G. B., Weinstein J. N. Disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Dec 15;21(24 Suppl):1S–1S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612151-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernelot Moens H. J., Hirshberg A. J., Claessens A. A. Data-source effects on the sensitivities and specificities of clinical features in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: the relevance of multiple sources of knowledge for a decision-support system. Med Decis Making. 1992 Oct-Dec;12(4):250–258. doi: 10.1177/0272989X9201200402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bischoff R. J., Rodriguez R. P., Gupta K., Righi A., Dalton J. E., Whitecloud T. S. A comparison of computed tomography-myelography, magnetic resonance imaging, and myelography in the diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord. 1993 Aug;6(4):289–295. doi: 10.1097/00002517-199306040-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Boden S. D., Davis D. O., Dina T. S., Patronas N. J., Wiesel S. W. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990 Mar;72(3):403–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bozzao A., Gallucci M., Masciocchi C., Aprile I., Barile A., Passariello R. Lumbar disk herniation: MR imaging assessment of natural history in patients treated without surgery. Radiology. 1992 Oct;185(1):135–141. doi: 10.1148/radiology.185.1.1523297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Connell F. A., Koepsell T. D. Measures of gain in certainty from a diagnostic test. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 May;121(5):744–753. doi: 10.1093/aje/121.5.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deyo R. A. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Terrific test or tar baby? N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):115–116. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Didry C., Lopez P., Baixas P., Simon L. Hernies discales lombaires non opérées. Evolution clinique et tomodensitométrique. Presse Med. 1991 Feb 23;20(7):299–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellenberger C., Jr MR imaging of the low back syndrome. Neurology. 1994 Apr;44(4):594–600. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.4.594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hanley J. A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1989;29(3):307–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Herzog R. J. The radiologic assessment for a lumbar disc herniation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Dec 15;21(24 Suppl):19S–38S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199612151-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hitselberger W. E., Witten R. M. Abnormal myelograms in asymptomatic patients. J Neurosurg. 1968 Mar;28(3):204–206. doi: 10.3171/jns.1968.28.3.0204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoffman R. M., Wheeler K. J., Deyo R. A. Surgery for herniated lumbar discs: a literature synthesis. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Sep;8(9):487–496. doi: 10.1007/BF02600110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hofman P. A., Wilmink J. T. Optimising the image of the intradural nerve root: the value of MR radiculography. Neuroradiology. 1996 Oct;38(7):654–657. doi: 10.1007/s002340050327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jackson R. P., Cain J. E., Jr, Jacobs R. R., Cooper B. R., McManus G. E. The neuroradiographic diagnosis of lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus: II. A comparison of computed tomography (CT), myelography, CT-myelography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1989 Dec;14(12):1362–1367. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198912000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jensen M. C., Brant-Zawadzki M. N., Obuchowski N., Modic M. T., Malkasian D., Ross J. S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):69–73. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199407143310201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. KNUTSSON B. Comparative value of electromyographic, myelographic and clinical-neurological examinations in diagnosis of lumbar root compression syndrome. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1961;49:1–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kerr R. S., Cadoux-Hudson T. A., Adams C. B. The value of accurate clinical assessment in the surgical management of the lumbar disc protrusion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Feb;51(2):169–173. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.2.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Knottnerus J. A., Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1143–1154. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90155-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Knottnerus J. A. The effects of disease verification and referral on the relationship between symptoms and diseases. Med Decis Making. 1987 Jul-Sep;7(3):139–148. doi: 10.1177/0272989X8700700304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kosteljanetz M., Espersen J. O., Halaburt H., Miletic T. Predictive value of clinical and surgical findings in patients with lumbago-sciatica. A prospective study (Part I). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1984;73(1-2):67–76. doi: 10.1007/BF01401785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lachs M. S., Nachamkin I., Edelstein P. H., Goldman J., Feinstein A. R., Schwartz J. S. Spectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick test for urinary tract infection. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jul 15;117(2):135–140. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-117-2-135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Metz C. E. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 1978 Oct;8(4):283–298. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(78)80014-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Ransohoff D. F., Feinstein A. R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1978 Oct 26;299(17):926–930. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197810262991705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Szypryt E. P., Twining P., Wilde G. P., Mulholland R. C., Worthington B. S. Diagnosis of lumbar disc protrusion. A comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and radiculography. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988 Nov;70(5):717–722. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.70B5.3192567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vroomen P. C., de Krom M. C., Knottnerus J. A. Consistency of history taking and physical examination in patients with suspected lumbar nerve root involvement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Jan;25(1):91–97. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200001010-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vroomen P. C., de Krom M. C., Knottnerus J. A. Diagnostic value of history and physical examination in patients suspected of sciatica due to disc herniation: a systematic review. J Neurol. 1999 Oct;246(10):899–906. doi: 10.1007/s004150050480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Vroomen P. C., de Krom M. C., Wilmink J. T., Kester A. D., Knottnerus J. A. Lack of effectiveness of bed rest for sciatica. N Engl J Med. 1999 Feb 11;340(6):418–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199902113400602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Weber H. Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1983 Mar;8(2):131–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. van den Hoogen H. M., Koes B. W., van Eijk J. T., Bouter L. M. On the accuracy of history, physical examination, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate in diagnosing low back pain in general practice. A criteria-based review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 Feb 1;20(3):318–327. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199502000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES