Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Jan;74(1):20–24. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.1.20

The INTERMED: a screening instrument to identify multiple sclerosis patients in need of multidisciplinary treatment

E Hoogervorst 1, P de Jonge 1, B Jelles 1, F Huyse 1, I Heeres 1, H M van der Ploeg 1, B Uitdehaag 1, C Polman 1
PMCID: PMC1738178  PMID: 12486260

Abstract

Objective: To analyse the value of the INTERMED, a screening instrument to assess case complexity, compared with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS) to identify multiple sclerosis (MS) patients in need of multidisciplinary treatment.

Methods: One hundred MS patients underwent INTERMED, EDSS, and GNDS examinations. Patient care needs were assessed by a multidisciplinary team and a goal oriented treatment plan was defined. Correlations between INTERMED, individual INTERMED domains, EDSS, GNDS sum score, and total number of proposed disciplines involved in the treatment plan were studied.

Results: Mean (SD) age was 40.6 (10.1) years. Median scores were 14.0 for the INTERMED, 4.0 for the EDSS, and 13.5 for the GNDS sum score. Moderate correlations were found between the INTERMED sum score and EDSS (r=0.59) and GNDS sum score (r=0.60). The number of disciplines as proposed by the multidisciplinary team showed the highest statistically significant correlation with the INTERMED sum score (r=0.41) compared with EDSS (r=0.32) and GNDS sum score (r=0.34). No significant or only weak correlations were found between the psychological domain of the INTERMED and EDSS or GNDS.

Conclusion: The findings in this study show that there is an additional value of the INTERMED compared with the EDSS and GNDS in identifying MS patients in need of multidisciplinary treatment. The INTERMED domains show the area of the patient's vulnerability and care needs: especially the INTERMED's psychological and social domains may guide the clinician to deal with specific problems that complicate healthcare delivery.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (103.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aubert R. E., Herman W. H., Waters J., Moore W., Sutton D., Peterson B. L., Bailey C. M., Koplan J. P. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Oct 15;129(8):605–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-8-199810150-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernabei R., Landi F., Gambassi G., Sgadari A., Zuccala G., Mor V., Rubenstein L. Z., Carbonin P. Randomised trial of impact of model of integrated care and case management for older people living in the community. BMJ. 1998 May 2;316(7141):1348–1351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7141.1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dean G. How many people in the world have multiple sclerosis? Neuroepidemiology. 1994;13(1-2):1–7. doi: 10.1159/000110351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fischer C. J., Stiefel F. C., De Jonge P., Guex P., Troendle A., Bulliard C., Huyse F. J., Gaillard R., Ruiz J. Case complexity and clinical outcome in diabetes mellitus. A prospective study using the INTERMED. Diabetes Metab. 2000 Sep;26(4):295–302. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Harris L. E., Luft F. C., Rudy D. W., Kesterson J. G., Tierney W. M. Effects of multidisciplinary case management in patients with chronic renal insufficiency. Am J Med. 1998 Dec;105(6):464–471. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00329-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Huyse F. J., Lyons J. S., Stiefel F. C., Slaets J. P., de Jonge P., Fink P., Gans R. O., Guex P., Herzog T., Lobo A. "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. I. Development and reliability. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 Jan-Feb;21(1):39–48. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00057-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Huyse F. J., de Jonge P., Lyons J. S., Stiefel F. C., Slaets J. P. INTERMED: a tool for controlling for confounding variables and designing multimodal treatment. J Psychosom Res. 1999 Apr;46(4):401–402. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(98)00099-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kurtzke J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444–1452. doi: 10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lublin F. D., Reingold S. C. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology. 1996 Apr;46(4):907–911. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.4.907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mazzocato C., Stiefel F., de Jonge P., Levorato A., Ducret S., Huyse F. J. Comprehensive assessment of patients in palliative care: a descriptive study utilizing the INTERMED. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2000 Feb;19(2):83–90. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00156-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Poser C. M., Paty D. W., Scheinberg L., McDonald W. I., Davis F. A., Ebers G. C., Johnson K. P., Sibley W. A., Silberberg D. H., Tourtellotte W. W. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol. 1983 Mar;13(3):227–231. doi: 10.1002/ana.410130302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sadovnick A. D., Ebers G. C. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: a critical overview. Can J Neurol Sci. 1993 Feb;20(1):17–29. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100047351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sharrack B., Hughes R. A. Scale development and Guy's Neurological Disability Scale. J Neurol. 1999 Mar;246(3):226–226. doi: 10.1007/s004150050340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sharrack B., Hughes R. A. The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale (GNDS): a new disability measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 1999 Aug;5(4):223–233. doi: 10.1177/135245859900500406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stewart S., Marley J. E., Horowitz J. D. Effects of a multidisciplinary, home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and survival among patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a randomised controlled study. Lancet. 1999 Sep 25;354(9184):1077–1083. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)03428-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Stiefel F. C., de Jonge P., Huyse F. J., Guex P., Slaets J. P., Lyons J. S., Spagnoli J., Vannotti M. "INTERMED": a method to assess health service needs. II. Results on its validity and clinical use. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1999 Jan-Feb;21(1):49–56. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00061-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stiefel F. C., de Jonge P., Huyse F. J., Slaets J. P., Guex P., Lyons J. S., Vannotti M., Fritsch C., Moeri R., Leyvraz P. F. INTERMED--an assessment and classification system for case complexity. Results in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 Feb 15;24(4):378–385. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199902150-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thompson T. A tribute to Alan Stoudemire, M.D.: 1951-2000. Psychosomatics. 2001 Jan-Feb;42(1):1–4. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. de Jonge P., Huyse F. J., Ruinemans G. M., Stiefel F. C., Lyons J. S., Slaets J. P. Timing of psychiatric consultations: the impact of social vulnerability and level of psychiatric dysfunction. Psychosomatics. 2000 Nov-Dec;41(6):505–511. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.41.6.505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Jonge P., Huyse F. J., Stiefel F. C., Slaets J. P., Gans R. O. INTERMED--a clinical instrument for biopsychosocial assessment. Psychosomatics. 2001 Mar-Apr;42(2):106–109. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.2.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Jonge Peter, Latour Corine, Huyse Frits J. Interrater reliability of the INTERMED in a heterogeneous somatic population. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Jan;52(1):25–27. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00309-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES