Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Jan;74(1):39–43. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.1.39

Outcome after mild traumatic brain injury: an examination of recruitment bias

S McCullagh 1, A Feinstein 1
PMCID: PMC1738189  PMID: 12486264

Abstract

Objectives: Research concerning the natural history after mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) faces a number of methodological challenges, including those related to subject recruitment. The aim of this study was to determine whether subjects who agree to participate in longitudinal research differ from those who do not. The presence of identifiable, selective factors operating during recruitment may be an important source of systematic bias. In Canada, given the presence of universal healthcare coverage, this issue can be examined using population based, administrative databases to obtain information about a cohort that was approached for study enrolment, regardless of whether they ultimately agreed to participate.

Methods: A sample of 626 consecutive patients with mild TBI was invited to enrol in TBI outcome research. Those who agreed to participate (n=272) were compared with those who refused (n=354) on demographic, past health, and injury related variables. Thereafter, using encrypted health card data, the two groups were contrasted with respect to pre-injury and post-injury healthcare utilisation.

Results: No premorbid differences between the groups emerged. However, all early indices of TBI severity were significantly worse for the participants group (p<0.001). Consistent with these findings, healthcare utilisation rates were no different before injury, but were significantly increased after injury for the participants (p<0.001), even beyond the period of study enrolment (p<0.001). Differences remained even after controlling for those with significant non-TBI injuries.

Conclusions: Premorbid factors did not predict whether patients comply with, or refuse study participation. However, the participants group was biased toward those with more significant injuries, which translated into higher rates of healthcare utilisation after injury. These results strike a cautionary note, given the apparent systematic bias influencing enrolment in longitudinal studies of mild TBI.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (106.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Alexander M. P. Mild traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical management. Neurology. 1995 Jul;45(7):1253–1260. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.7.1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Binder L. M., Rohling M. L., Larrabee G. J. A review of mild head trauma. Part I: Meta-analytic review of neuropsychological studies. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Jun;19(3):421–431. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Britton A., McKee M., Black N., McPherson K., Sanderson C., Bain C. Threats to applicability of randomised trials: exclusions and selective participation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Apr;4(2):112–121. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Condon J. T. The 'unresearched'--those who decline to participate. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 1986 Mar;20(1):87–89. doi: 10.3109/00048678609158870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dikmen S., McLean A., Temkin N. Neuropsychological and psychosocial consequences of minor head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;49(11):1227–1232. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.49.11.1227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edlund M. J., Craig T. J., Richardson M. A. Informed consent as a form of volunteer bias. Am J Psychiatry. 1985 May;142(5):624–627. doi: 10.1176/ajp.142.5.624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gómez P. A., Lobato R. D., Ortega J. M., De La Cruz J. Mild head injury: differences in prognosis among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and analysis of factors associated with abnormal CT findings. Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Oct;10(5):453–460. doi: 10.1080/02688699647078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Holden G., Rosenberg G., Barker K., Tuhrim S., Brenner B. The recruitment of research participants: a review. Soc Work Health Care. 1993;19(2):1–44. doi: 10.1300/J010v19n02_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kibby M. Y., Long C. J. Minor head injury: attempts at clarifying the confusion. Brain Inj. 1996 Mar;10(3):159–186. doi: 10.1080/026990596124494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. King N. S. Emotional, neuropsychological, and organic factors: their use in the prediction of persisting postconcussion symptoms after moderate and mild head injuries. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;61(1):75–81. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.61.1.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kroenke K., Price R. K. Symptoms in the community. Prevalence, classification, and psychiatric comorbidity. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Nov 8;153(21):2474–2480. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Levin H. S., Mattis S., Ruff R. M., Eisenberg H. M., Marshall L. F., Tabaddor K., High W. M., Jr, Frankowski R. F. Neurobehavioral outcome following minor head injury: a three-center study. J Neurosurg. 1987 Feb;66(2):234–243. doi: 10.3171/jns.1987.66.2.0234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Levin H. S., O'Donnell V. M., Grossman R. G. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1979 Nov;167(11):675–684. doi: 10.1097/00005053-197911000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lishman W. A. Physiogenesis and psychogenesis in the 'post-concussional syndrome'. Br J Psychiatry. 1988 Oct;153:460–469. doi: 10.1192/bjp.153.4.460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. McCullagh S., Oucherlony D., Protzner A., Blair N., Feinstein A. Prediction of neuropsychiatric outcome following mild trauma brain injury: an examination of the Glasgow Coma Scale. Brain Inj. 2001 Jun;15(6):489–497. doi: 10.1080/02699050010007353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. McMillan T. M., Jongen E. L., Greenwood R. J. Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: retrospective or prospective? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;60(4):422–427. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.4.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Middleboe T., Andersen H. S., Birket-Smith M., Friis M. L. Minor head injury: impact on general health after 1 year. A prospective follow-up study. Acta Neurol Scand. 1992 Jan;85(1):5–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mittenberg W., DiGiulio D. V., Perrin S., Bass A. E. Symptoms following mild head injury: expectation as aetiology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;55(3):200–204. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.3.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Paniak C., Toller-Lobe G., Durand A., Nagy J. A randomized trial of two treatments for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 1998 Dec;12(12):1011–1023. doi: 10.1080/026990598121927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ponsford J., Willmott C., Rothwell A., Cameron P., Kelly A. M., Nelms R., Curran C., Ng K. Factors influencing outcome following mild traumatic brain injury in adults. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2000 Jul;6(5):568–579. doi: 10.1017/s1355617700655066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Simon G., Gater R., Kisely S., Piccinelli M. Somatic symptoms of distress: an international primary care study. Psychosom Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;58(5):481–488. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199609000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Stambrook M., Moore A. D., Peters L. C., Deviaene C., Hawryluk G. A. Effects of mild, moderate and severe closed head injury on long-term vocational status. Brain Inj. 1990 Apr-Jun;4(2):183–190. doi: 10.3109/02699059009026164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Wade D. T., Crawford S., Wenden F. J., King N. S., Moss N. E. Does routine follow up after head injury help? A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997 May;62(5):478–484. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.62.5.478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Williams D. H., Levin H. S., Eisenberg H. M. Mild head injury classification. Neurosurgery. 1990 Sep;27(3):422–428. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199009000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. van Hemert A. M., Hengeveld M. W., Bolk J. H., Rooijmans H. G., Vandenbroucke J. P. Psychiatric disorders in relation to medical illness among patients of a general medical out-patient clinic. Psychol Med. 1993 Feb;23(1):167–173. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700038952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES