Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Feb;74(2):231–237. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.2.231

Quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings in symptomatic patients with extracranial shunts

P Eide 1
PMCID: PMC1738267  PMID: 12531957

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the outcome of management of possible shunt related symptoms using intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, and to identify potential methodological limitations with the current strategies of ICP assessment.

Methods: The distribution of persistent symptoms related to extracranial shunt treatment was compared before and after management of shunt failure in 69 consecutive hydrocephalic cases. Management was heavily based on ICP monitoring (calculation of mean ICP and visual determination of plateau waves). After the end of patient management, all ICP curves were re-evaluated using a quantitative method and software (SensometricsTM pressure analyser). The ICP curves were presented as a matrix of numbers of ICP elevations (20 to 35 mm Hg) or depressions (-10 to -5 mm Hg) of different durations (0.5, 1, or 5 minutes). The numbers of ICP elevations/depressions standardised to 10 hours recording time were calculated to allow comparisons of ICP between individuals.

Results: After ICP monitoring and management of the putative shunt related symptoms, the symptoms remained unchanged in as many as 58% of the cases, with the highest percentages in those patients with ICP considered normal or too low at the time of ICP monitoring. The quantitative analysis revealed a high frequency of ICP elevations (20 to 35 mm Hg lasting 0.5 to 1 minute) and ICP depressions (-10 to -5 mm Hg lasting 0.5, 1, or 5 minutes), particularly in patients with ICP considered normal.

Conclusions: The value of continuous ICP monitoring with ICP analysis using current criteria appears doubtful in the management of possible shunt related symptoms. This may reflect limitations in the strategies of ICP analysis. Calculation of the exact numbers of ICP elevations and depressions may provide a more accurate description of the ICP profile.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (232.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Abbott R., Epstein F. J., Wisoff J. H. Chronic headache associated with a functioning shunt: usefulness of pressure monitoring. Neurosurgery. 1991 Jan;28(1):72–77. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199101000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Børgesen S. E., Gjerris F., Sørensen S. C. Intracranial pressure and conductance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1979 Apr;50(4):489–493. doi: 10.3171/jns.1979.50.4.0489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Børgesen S. E., Gjerris F. The predictive value of conductance to outflow of CSF in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain. 1982 Mar;105(Pt 1):65–86. doi: 10.1093/brain/105.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardoso E. R., Piatek D., Del Bigio M. R., Stambrook M., Sutherland J. B. Quantification of abnormal intracranial pressure waves and isotope cisternography for diagnosis of occult communicating hydrocephalus. Surg Neurol. 1989 Jan;31(1):20–27. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(89)90214-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Czosnyka M., Smielewski P., Piechnik S., Schmidt E. A., Al-Rawi P. G., Kirkpatrick P. J., Pickard J. D. Hemodynamic characterization of intracranial pressure plateau waves in head-injury patients. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul;91(1):11–19. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.1.0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Czosnyka Z. H., Czosnyka M., Pickard J. D. Shunt testing in-vivo: a method based on the data from the UK shunt evaluation laboratory. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;81:27–30. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6738-0_7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Di Rocco C., McLone D. G., Shimoji T., Raimondi A. J. Continuous intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid pressure recording in hydrocephalic children during wakefulness and sleep. J Neurosurg. 1975 Jun;42(6):683–689. doi: 10.3171/jns.1975.42.6.0683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Eide P. K., Fremming A. D. A new method and software for quantitative analysis of continuous intracranial pressure recordings. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001 Dec;143(12):1237–1247. doi: 10.1007/s007010100020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eide P. K., Helseth E., Due-Tønnessen B., Lundar T. Changes in intracranial pressure after calvarial expansion surgery in children with slit ventricle syndrome. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001 Oct;35(4):195–204. doi: 10.1159/000050421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eide Per Kristian, Due-Tønnessen Bernt, Helseth Eirik, Lundar Tryggve. Differences in quantitative characteristics of intracranial pressure in hydrocephalic children treated surgically or conservatively. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2002 Jun;36(6):304–313. doi: 10.1159/000063534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foltz E. L., Blanks J. P. Symptomatic low intracranial pressure in shunted hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. 1988 Mar;68(3):401–408. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.68.3.0401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fouyas I. P., Casey A. T., Thompson D., Harkness W. F., Hayward R. D. Use of intracranial pressure monitoring in the management of childhood hydrocephalus and shunt-related problems. Neurosurgery. 1996 Apr;38(4):726–732. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Krauss J. K., Droste D. W., Bohus M., Regel J. P., Scheremet R., Riemann D., Seeger W. The relation of intracranial pressure B-waves to different sleep stages in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;136(3-4):195–203. doi: 10.1007/BF01410626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. LUNDBERG N. Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1960;36(149):1–193. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pople I. K., Muhlbauer M. S., Sanford R. A., Kirk E. Results and complications of intracranial pressure monitoring in 303 children. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1995;23(2):64–67. doi: 10.1159/000120938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Raftopoulos C., Deleval J., Chaskis C., Leonard A., Cantraine F., Desmyttere F., Clarysse S., Brotchi J. Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study. Neurosurgery. 1994 Sep;35(3):397–405. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199409000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rekate H. L. Classification of slit-ventricle syndromes using intracranial pressure monitoring. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1993;19(1):15–20. doi: 10.1159/000120694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Renier D., Sainte-Rose C., Marchac D., Hirsch J. F. Intracranial pressure in craniostenosis. J Neurosurg. 1982 Sep;57(3):370–377. doi: 10.3171/jns.1982.57.3.0370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sahuquillo J., Rubio E., Codina A., Molins A., Guitart J. M., Poca M. A., Chasampi A. Reappraisal of the intracranial pressure and cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in patients with the so-called "normal pressure hydrocephalus" syndrome. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991;112(1-2):50–61. doi: 10.1007/BF01402454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson D. N., Harkness W., Jones B., Gonsalez S., Andar U., Hayward R. Subdural intracranial pressure monitoring in craniosynostosis: its role in surgical management. Childs Nerv Syst. 1995 May;11(5):269–275. doi: 10.1007/BF00301758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES