Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Feb;74(2):238–241. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.2.238

Lay versus expert interviewers for the diagnosis of migraine in a large sample of elderly people

C Tzourio 1, B Gagniere 1, M El Amrani 1, M Bousser 1, A Alperovitch 1
PMCID: PMC1738298  PMID: 12531958

Abstract

Objective: To determine the agreement between lay interviewers and experts in the diagnosis of migraine by questionnaire.

Subjects: A population based sample of 1188 individuals aged 64 to 73 years.

Methods: Participants who declared that they had recurrent headaches (n = 238) answered a structured questionnaire by lay interviewers with special training in migraine. A migraine expert subsequently interviewed all the headache sufferers using the same questionnaire. Migraine was defined according to the International Headache Society criteria.

Results: In comparison with the expert, the diagnosis derived by the lay interviewers had high values for specificity (97%) and positive predictive value (86%), and a low sensitivity (50%) and negative predictive value (57%). Agreement between the expert and the lay interviewers was low, with a κ value of 0.36 (95% confidence interval 0.26 to 0.47). The most serious discrepancies concerned the duration of attacks, the worsening of headaches by physical activity, the presence of nausea or vomiting, and the unilaterality of headaches. As a result, the lifetime prevalence of migraine headaches was greatly underestimated by lay interviewers (6.5%) in comparison with the expert (11.1%).

Conclusions: A low level of agreement between lay interviewers and a headache expert in the diagnosis of migraine headaches by structured questionnaire may result in a substantial underestimation of migraine prevalence.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (128.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brennan P., Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ. 1992 Jun 6;304(6840):1491–1494. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6840.1491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Breslau N., Rasmussen B. K. The impact of migraine: Epidemiology, risk factors, and co-morbidities. Neurology. 2001;56(6 Suppl 1):S4–12. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_1.s4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dufouil C., de Kersaint-Gilly A., Besançon V., Levy C., Auffray E., Brunnereau L., Alpérovitch A., Tzourio C. Longitudinal study of blood pressure and white matter hyperintensities: the EVA MRI Cohort. Neurology. 2001 Apr 10;56(7):921–926. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.7.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Granella F., D'Alessandro R., Manzoni G. C., Cerbo R., Colucci D'Amato C., Pini L. A., Savi L., Zanferrari C., Nappi G. International Headache Society classification: interobserver reliability in the diagnosis of primary headaches. Cephalalgia. 1994 Feb;14(1):16–20. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2982.1994.1401016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Michel P., Dartigues J. F., Henry P., Tison S., Auriacombe S., Brochet B., Vivares C., Salamon R. Validity of the International Headache Society criteria for migraine. GRIM. Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire sur la Migraine. Neuroepidemiology. 1993;12(1):51–57. doi: 10.1159/000110299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rasmussen B. K., Jensen R., Olesen J. Questionnaire versus clinical interview in the diagnosis of headache. Headache. 1991 May;31(5):290–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.1991.hed3105290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rasmussen B. K., Jensen R., Schroll M., Olesen J. Epidemiology of headache in a general population--a prevalence study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(11):1147–1157. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90147-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tzourio C., Dufouil C., Ducimetière P., Alpérovitch A. Cognitive decline in individuals with high blood pressure: a longitudinal study in the elderly. EVA Study Group. Epidemiology of Vascular Aging. Neurology. 1999 Dec 10;53(9):1948–1952. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.1948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tzourio C., Tehindrazanarivelo A., Iglésias S., Alpérovitch A., Chedru F., d'Anglejan-Chatillon J., Bousser M. G. Case-control study of migraine and risk of ischaemic stroke in young women. BMJ. 1995 Apr 1;310(6983):830–833. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6983.830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES