Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Apr;74(4):479–484. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.4.479

Is a combination of Tc-SPECT or perfusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging with spinal tap test helpful in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus?

F Hertel 1, C Walter 1, M Schmitt 1, M Morsdorf 1, W Jammers 1, H Busch 1, M Bettag 1
PMCID: PMC1738382  PMID: 12640067

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the combination of spinal tap test (STT) with cerebral perfusion measurement assessed either by Tc-bicisate-SPECT (Tc-SPECT) or perfusion weighted MRI (pwMRI), or both, for a better preoperative selection of promising candidates for shunt operations in suspected idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus.

Methods: 27 consecutive patients were examined with a standard clinical protocol (assessed by the Homburg Hydrocephalus Scale (HHS)) as well as with 99m Tc-bicisate-SPECT (n=27) or additionally by pwMRI (n=12) before and after STT. The results of these examinations were compared preoperatively for each patient and correlated with postoperative clinical outcome after shunt surgery.

Results: Nine patients showed both, a clinical improvement, and increased cerebral perfusion after STT. They underwent shunt surgery with good to excellent results. In another nine patients increasing cerebral perfusion was detected although they did not show a clear clinical improvement after STT. Six of them also received a shunt operation with good to excellent outcome. Three patients of the last group could have an operation. Nine patients did not show any clinical improvement or any kind of increasing cerebral perfusion after STT. Therefore, they did not undergo surgery. The results of SPECT and pwMRI correlated in 92 % of the patients (11 of 12).

Conclusion: It is concluded that a combination of clinical assessment with SPECT or pwMRI is helpful in the preoperative selection of patients for shunting procedures with suspected NPH syndrome. This combination is a minimal invasive and objective test modality that is superior to STT alone. Further studies are necessary for a comparison of the described imaging techniques with different diagnostic tests in this difficult field of cerebral disease.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (193.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Black P. M., Ojemann R. G., Tzouras A. CSF shunts for dementia, incontinence, and gait disturbance. Clin Neurosurg. 1985;32:632–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boon A. J., Tans J. T., Delwel E. J., Egeler-Peerdeman S. M., Hanlo P. W., Wurzer H. A., Hermans J. The Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study. How to select patients for shunting? An analysis of four diagnostic criteria. Surg Neurol. 2000 Mar;53(3):201–207. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00182-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bradley W. G., Jr Diagnostic tools in hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001 Oct;12(4):661-84, viii. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Del Bigio M. R., Bruni J. E. Changes in periventricular vasculature of rabbit brain following induction of hydrocephalus and after shunting. J Neurosurg. 1988 Jul;69(1):115–120. doi: 10.3171/jns.1988.69.1.0115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fisher C. M. Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly. Neurology. 1982 Dec;32(12):1358–1363. doi: 10.1212/wnl.32.12.1358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gallassi R., Morreale A., Montagna P., Sacquegna T., Di Sarro R., Lugaresi E. Binswanger's disease and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Clinical and neuropsychological comparison. Arch Neurol. 1991 Nov;48(11):1156–1159. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530230064023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greitz T. Effect of brain distension on cerebral circulation. Lancet. 1969 Apr 26;1(7600):863–865. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91903-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hebb A. O., Cusimano M. D. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery. 2001 Nov;49(5):1166–1186. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200111000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M., Tanaka A., Yoshinaga S. Significance of periventricular hemodynamics in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 1992 May;30(5):701–705. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kitagaki H., Mori E., Ishii K., Yamaji S., Hirono N., Imamura T. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998 Aug;19(7):1277–1284. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Krauss J. K., Regel J. P., Vach W., Droste D. W., Borremans J. J., Mergner T. Vascular risk factors and arteriosclerotic disease in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly. Stroke. 1996 Jan;27(1):24–29. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.1.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kristensen B., Malm J., Fagerland M., Hietala S. O., Johansson B., Ekstedt J., Karlsson T. Regional cerebral blood flow, white matter abnormalities, and cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with idiopathic adult hydrocephalus syndrome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Mar;60(3):282–288. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.3.282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kushner M., Younkin D., Weinberger J., Hurtig H., Goldberg H., Reivich M. Cerebral hemodynamics in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurology. 1984 Jan;34(1):96–99. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.1.96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Larsson A., Bergh A. C., Bilting M., Arlig A., Jacobsson L., Stephensen H., Wikkelsö C. Regional cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus: diagnostic and prognostic aspects. Eur J Nucl Med. 1994 Feb;21(2):118–123. doi: 10.1007/BF00175758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu G., Sobering G., Duyn J., Moonen C. T. A functional MRI technique combining principles of echo-shifting with a train of observations (PRESTO). Magn Reson Med. 1993 Dec;30(6):764–768. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910300617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mamo H. L., Meric P. C., Ponsin J. C., Rey A. C., Luft A. G., Seylaz J. A. Cerebral blood flow in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Stroke. 1987 Nov-Dec;18(6):1074–1080. doi: 10.1161/01.str.18.6.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meyer J. S., Tachibana H., Hardenberg J. P., Dowell R. E., Jr, Kitagawa Y., Mortel K. F. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Influences on cerebral hemodynamic and cerebrospinal fluid pressure--chemical autoregulation. Surg Neurol. 1984 Feb;21(2):195–203. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(84)90342-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Miethke C., Affeld K. A new valve for the treatment of hydrocephalus. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1994 Jul-Aug;39(7-8):181–187. doi: 10.1515/bmte.1994.39.7-8.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mori K., Maeda M., Asegawa S., Iwata J. Quantitative local cerebral blood flow change after cerebrospinal fluid removal in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus measured by a double injection method with N-isopropyl-p-[(123)I] iodoamphetamine. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002 Mar;144(3):255–263. doi: 10.1007/s007010200033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Raftopoulos C., Chaskis C., Delecluse F., Cantraine F., Bidaut L., Brotchi J. Morphological quantitative analysis of intracranial pressure waves in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Res. 1992 Dec;14(5):389–396. doi: 10.1080/01616412.1992.11740091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Savolainen S., Hurskainen H., Paljärvi L., Alafuzoff I., Vapalahti M. Five-year outcome of normal pressure hydrocephalus with or without a shunt: predictive value of the clinical signs, neuropsychological evaluation and infusion test. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002 Jun;144(6):515–523. doi: 10.1007/s00701-002-0936-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tamaki N., Kusunoki T., Wakabayashi T., Matsumoto S. Cerebral hemodynamics in normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Evaluation by 133Xe inhalation method and dynamic CT study. J Neurosurg. 1984 Sep;61(3):510–514. doi: 10.3171/jns.1984.61.3.0510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Tanaka A., Kimura M., Nakayama Y., Yoshinaga S., Tomonaga M. Cerebral blood flow and autoregulation in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 1997 Jun;40(6):1161–1167. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199706000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Vanneste J. A. Diagnosis and management of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol. 2000 Jan;247(1):5–14. doi: 10.1007/s004150050003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vanneste J. A. Three decades of normal pressure hydrocephalus: are we wiser now? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Sep;57(9):1021–1025. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.9.1021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Walchenbach R., Geiger E., Thomeer R. T. W. M., Vanneste J. A. L. The value of temporary external lumbar CSF drainage in predicting the outcome of shunting on normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;72(4):503–506. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.72.4.503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Waldemar G., Schmidt J. F., Delecluse F., Andersen A. R., Gjerris F., Paulson O. B. High resolution SPECT with [99mTc]-d,l-HMPAO in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunt operation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Jun;56(6):655–664. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.6.655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wikkelsö C., Andersson H., Blomstrand C., Lindqvist G., Svendsen P. Normal pressure hydrocephalus. Predictive value of the cerebrospinal fluid tap-test. Acta Neurol Scand. 1986 Jun;73(6):566–573. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1986.tb04601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Zimmer R., Leucht S., Rädler T., Schmauss F., Gebhardt U., Lauter H. Variability of cerebral blood flow deficits in 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT in patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 1997;104(6-7):689–701. doi: 10.1007/BF01291886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES