Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2003 Sep;74(9):1283–1287. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1283

Focused high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for localisation of the unexposed primary motor cortex during brain tumour surgery

V Rohde 1, L Mayfrank 1, M Weinzierl 1, T Krings 1, J Gilsbach 1
PMCID: PMC1738666  PMID: 12933937

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate if intraoperative focused high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can localise the primary motor cortex without exposure of the cortical surface.

Methods: A high frequency train (357 Hz) of four suprathreshold magnetic stimuli was delivered transcranially to the region of the rolandic area during brain tumour operations in 12 patients. To induce a focal magnetoelectric field, the flat figure of eight coil (outer diameter of each loop 7 cm) was used. Motor evoked potentials (MEP) were recorded in eight muscles of the upper and lower contralateral extremities. The first stimulation site was 2.5 cm behind the bregma, the second site 2 cm, and the third site 4 cm dorsal to the first stimulation site. If no MEP were obtainable, stimulation was repeated in anteroposterior direction at more laterally located sites. Using neuronavigation, each positive stimulation site was correlated with the underlying cortical anatomy.

Results: Stimulation was performed at a total of 42 sites (in two patients, maximum stimulation at the three initial sites failed to evoke a motor response). In four patients, MEP were obtained only from one stimulation site. This site exactly overlayed the primary motor cortex. In eight patients, MEP could be elicited from more than one stimulation site. In seven of the eight patients, the site from which MEP with peak amplitudes were elicited, corresponded to the primary motor cortex. In total, the primary motor cortex was correctly identified on the basis of electrophysiological findings in 11 of 12 patients (92 %). In two patients, only the more lateral stimulation sites permitted MEP recording.

Conclusion: Intraoperative focused rTMS is highly sensitive for localisation of the primary motor cortex. Focused rTMS as a localising instrument alleviates the need of motor cortex exposure and, thereby, can contribute to minimise the surgical approach to brain tumours in the rolandic area.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (150.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amassian V. E., Cracco R. Q., Maccabee P. J., Bigland-Ritchie B., Cracco J. B. Matching focal and non-focal magnetic coil stimulation to properties of human nervous system: mapping motor unit fields in motor cortex contrasted with altering sequential digit movements by premotor-SMA stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:3–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barker A. T., Freeston I. L., Jabinous R., Jarratt J. A. Clinical evaluation of conduction time measurements in central motor pathways using magnetic stimulation of human brain. Lancet. 1986 Jun 7;1(8493):1325–1326. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91243-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barker A. T., Jalinous R., Freeston I. L. Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet. 1985 May 11;1(8437):1106–1107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berger M. S., Cohen W. A., Ojemann G. A. Correlation of motor cortex brain mapping data with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 1990 Mar;72(3):383–387. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.3.0383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bittar R. G., Olivier A., Sadikot A. F., Andermann F., Pike G. B., Reutens D. C. Presurgical motor and somatosensory cortex mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Neurosurg. 1999 Dec;91(6):915–921. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.6.0915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boroojerdi B., Foltys H., Krings T., Spetzger U., Thron A., Töpper R. Localization of the motor hand area using transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr;110(4):699–704. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(98)00027-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Buchner H., Adams L., Knepper A., Rüger R., Laborde G., Gilsbach J. M., Ludwig I., Reul J., Scherg M. Preoperative localization of the central sulcus by dipole source analysis of early somatosensory evoked potentials and three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg. 1994 May;80(5):849–856. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.5.0849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burke D., Hicks R., Gandevia S. C., Stephen J., Woodforth I., Crawford M. Direct comparison of corticospinal volleys in human subjects to transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation. J Physiol. 1993 Oct;470:383–393. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cedzich C., Taniguchi M., Schäfer S., Schramm J. Somatosensory evoked potential phase reversal and direct motor cortex stimulation during surgery in and around the central region. Neurosurgery. 1996 May;38(5):962–970. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199605000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohen L. G., Roth B. J., Nilsson J., Dang N., Panizza M., Bandinelli S., Friauf W., Hallett M. Effects of coil design on delivery of focal magnetic stimulation. Technical considerations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):350–357. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)90113-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cowan J. M., Rothwell J. C., Dick J. P., Thompson P. D., Day B. L., Marsden C. D. Abnormalities in central motor pathway conduction in multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 1984 Aug 11;2(8398):304–307. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92683-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Day B. L., Thompson P. D., Dick J. P., Nakashima K., Marsden C. D. Different sites of action of electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Neurosci Lett. 1987 Mar 20;75(1):101–106. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(87)90083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ganslandt O., Fahlbusch R., Nimsky C., Kober H., Möller M., Steinmeier R., Romstöck J., Vieth J. Functional neuronavigation with magnetoencephalography: outcome in 50 patients with lesions around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg. 1999 Jul;91(1):73–79. doi: 10.3171/jns.1999.91.1.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a useful tool for clinical neurophysiology. Ann Neurol. 1996 Sep;40(3):344–345. doi: 10.1002/ana.410400303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hess C. W., Mills K. R., Murray N. M., Schriefer T. N. Magnetic brain stimulation: central motor conduction studies in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 1987 Dec;22(6):744–752. doi: 10.1002/ana.410220611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ingram D. A., Thompson A. J., Swash M. Central motor conduction in multiple sclerosis: evaluation of abnormalities revealed by transcutaneous magnetic stimulation of the brain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Apr;51(4):487–494. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.4.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kalkman C. J., Ubags L. H., Been H. D., Swaan A., Drummond J. C. Improved amplitude of myogenic motor evoked responses after paired transcranial electrical stimulation during sufentanil/nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1995 Aug;83(2):270–276. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199508000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Katayama Y., Tsubokawa T., Maejima S., Hirayama T., Yamamoto T. Corticospinal direct response in humans: identification of the motor cortex during intracranial surgery under general anaesthesia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1988 Jan;51(1):50–59. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.51.1.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kombos T., Suess O., Funk T., Kern B. C., Brock M. Intra-operative mapping of the motor cortex during surgery in and around the motor cortex. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142(3):263–268. doi: 10.1007/s007010050034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Krings T., Buchbinder B. R., Butler W. E., Chiappa K. H., Jiang H. J., Rosen B. R., Cosgrove G. R. Stereotactic transcranial magnetic stimulation: correlation with direct electrical cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1997 Dec;41(6):1319–1326. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199712000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Krings T., Foltys H., Reinges M. H., Kemeny S., Rohde V., Spetzger U., Gilsbach J. M., Thron A. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation for presurgical planning--correlation with functional MRI. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2001 Dec;44(4):234–239. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-19935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Krings T., Reinges M. H., Erberich S., Kemeny S., Rohde V., Spetzger U., Korinth M., Willmes K., Gilsbach J. M., Thron A. Functional MRI for presurgical planning: problems, artefacts, and solution strategies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Jun;70(6):749–760. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.6.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Levy W. J., Amassian V. E., Schmid U. D., Jungreis C. Mapping of motor cortex gyral sites non-invasively by transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects and patients. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1991;43:51–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Mortifee P., Stewart H., Schulzer M., Eisen A. Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Apr;93(2):131–137. doi: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90076-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pechstein U., Cedzich C., Nadstawek J., Schramm J. Transcranial high-frequency repetitive electrical stimulation for recording myogenic motor evoked potentials with the patient under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery. 1996 Aug;39(2):335–344. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199608000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Reinges M. H., Krings T., Nguyen H. H., Küker W., Spetzger U., Rohde V., Hütter B. O., Thron A., Gilsbach J. M. Virtual pointer projection of the central sulcus to the outside of the skull using frameless neuronavigation -- accuracy and applications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000;142(12):1385–1390. doi: 10.1007/s007010070009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Roberts D. W., Hartov A., Kennedy F. E., Miga M. I., Paulsen K. D. Intraoperative brain shift and deformation: a quantitative analysis of cortical displacement in 28 cases. Neurosurgery. 1998 Oct;43(4):749–760. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199810000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Silbergeld D. L. A new device for cortical stimulation mapping of surgically unexposed cortex. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 1993 Oct;79(4):612–614. doi: 10.3171/jns.1993.79.4.0612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Taniguchi M., Nadstawek J., Langenbach U., Bremer F., Schramm J. Effects of four intravenous anesthetic agents on motor evoked potentials elicited by magnetic transcranial stimulation. Neurosurgery. 1993 Sep;33(3):407–415. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78801-7_46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Watt J. W., Fraser M. H., Soni B. M., Sett P. K., Clay R. Total i.v. anaesthesia for transcranial magnetic evoked potential spinal cord monitoring. Br J Anaesth. 1996 Jun;76(6):870–871. doi: 10.1093/bja/76.6.870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES