Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2004 Oct;75(10):1443–1448. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.025957

Saccadic visual search training: a treatment for patients with homonymous hemianopia

A Pambakian 1, S Mannan 1, T Hodgson 1, C Kennard 1
PMCID: PMC1738779  PMID: 15377693

Abstract

Objectives: We describe a novel rehabilitation tool for patients with homonymous hemianopia based on a visual search (VS) paradigm that is portable, inexpensive, and easy to deploy. We hypothesised that by training patients to improve the efficiency of eye movements made in their blind field their disability would be alleviated.

Methods: Twenty nine patients with homonymous visual field defects (HVFD) without neglect practised VS paradigms in 20 daily sessions over one month. Search fields comprising randomly positioned target and distracter elements, differing by a single feature, were displayed for three seconds on a dedicated television monitor in the patients' homes.

Improvements were assessed by examining response time (RT), error rates in VS, perimetric visual fields (VFs) and visual search fields (VSFs), before and after treatment. Functional improvements were measured using objective visual tasks which represented activities of daily living (ADL) and a subjective questionnaire.

Results: As a group the patients had significantly shorter mean RT in VS after training (p<0.001) and demonstrated a variety of mechanisms to account for this. Improvements were confined to the training period and maintained at follow up. Three patients had significantly longer RT after training. They had high initial error rates which improved with training. Patients performed ADL tasks significantly faster after training and reported significant subjective improvements. There was no concomitant enlargement of the VF, but there was a small but significant enlargement of the VSF.

Conclusion: Patients can improve VS with practice. This usually involves shorter RTs, but occasionally a longer RT in a complex speed–accuracy trade-off. These changes translate to improved overall visual function, assessed objectively and subjectively, suggesting that they represent robust training effects. The underlying mechanism may involve the adoption of compensatory eye movement strategies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Balliet R., Blood K. M., Bach-y-Rita P. Visual field rehabilitation in the cortically blind? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 Nov;48(11):1113–1124. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.11.1113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chédru F., Leblanc M., Lhermitte F. Visual searching in normal and brain-damaged subjects (contribution to the study of unilateral inattention). Cortex. 1973 Mar;9(1):94–111. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(73)80019-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. GASSEL M. M., WILLIAMS D. Visual function in patients with homonymous hemianopial II. Oculomotor mechanisms. Brain. 1963 Mar;86:1–36. doi: 10.1093/brain/86.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hallett P. E., Lightstone A. D. Saccadic eye movements to flashed targets. Vision Res. 1976 Jan;16(1):107–114. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(76)90084-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hine M. L. THE RECOVERY OF FIELDS OF VISION IN CONCUSSION INJURIES OF THE OCCIPITAL CORTEX. Br J Ophthalmol. 1918 Jan;2(1):12–25. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2.1.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ishiai S., Odajima N., Kotera M., Furukawa T., Tsukagoshi H. [Eye fixation-patterns in homonymous hemianopia and unilateral spatial neglect: a study with an eye camera]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 1987 May;27(5):634–641. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kasten E., Poggel D. A., Sabel B. A. Computer-based training of stimulus detection improves color and simple pattern recognition in the defective field of hemianopic subjects. J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):1001–1012. doi: 10.1162/08989290051137530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kasten E., Wüst S., Behrens-Baumann W., Sabel B. A. Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindness. Nat Med. 1998 Sep;4(9):1083–1087. doi: 10.1038/2079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kerkhoff G., Münssinger U., Meier E. K. Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol. 1994 May;51(5):474–481. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540170050016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kerkhoff G., Schaub J., Zihl J. Die Anamnese zerebral bedingter Sehstörungen. Nervenarzt. 1990 Dec;61(12):711–718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Meienberg O., Zangemeister W. H., Rosenberg M., Hoyt W. F., Stark L. Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Ann Neurol. 1981 Jun;9(6):537–544. doi: 10.1002/ana.410090605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nelles G., Esser J., Eckstein A., Tiede A., Gerhard H., Diener H. C. Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2001 Jun 29;306(3):189–192. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01907-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nelles G., Esser J., Eckstein A., Tiede A., Gerhard H., Diener H. C. Compensatory visual field training for patients with hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett. 2001 Jun 29;306(3):189–192. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01907-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Oldfield R. C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pambakian A. L., Kennard C. Can visual function be restored in patients with homonymous hemianopia? Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Apr;81(4):324–328. doi: 10.1136/bjo.81.4.324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pambakian A. L., Wooding D. S., Patel N., Morland A. B., Kennard C., Mannan S. K. Scanning the visual world: a study of patients with homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Dec;69(6):751–759. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.69.6.751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Poggel D. A., Kasten E., Müller-Oehring E. M., Sabel B. A., Brandt S. A. Unusual spontaneous and training induced visual field recovery in a patient with a gunshot lesion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;70(2):236–239. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.70.2.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Savir H., Michelson I., David C., Mendelson L., Najenseon T. Homonymous hemianopsia and rehabilitation in fifteen cases of C.C.I. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1977;9(4):151–153. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilson B., Cockburn J., Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Feb;68(2):98–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Zangemeister W. H., Meienberg O., Stark L., Hoyt W. F. Eye-head coordination in homonymous hemianopia. J Neurol. 1982;226(4):243–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00313397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zeki S. A century of cerebral achromatopsia. Brain. 1990 Dec;113(Pt 6):1721–1777. doi: 10.1093/brain/113.6.1721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Zihl J. Homonyme Hemianopsie und ihre Rehabilitation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1988 May;192(5):555–558. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1050177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Zihl J. Visual scanning behavior in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia. 1995 Mar;33(3):287–303. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)00119-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES