Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2004 Dec;75(12):1702–1706. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.039438

Variations in care and outcome in the first year after stroke: a Western and Central European perspective

C Wolfe 1, K Tilling 1, A Rudd 1, M Giroud 1, D Inzitari 1
PMCID: PMC1738847  PMID: 15548486

Abstract

Background: There are significant variations in the short term patterns of care and outcome after a first stroke in Europe.

Objective: To estimate the variation in stroke care and outcome up to 1 year after a stroke in selected European centres.

Methods: Hospital based stroke registers were established in 11 hospitals in seven western and central European countries to collect demographic, clinical, and resource use data at the time of first ever stroke during 1993–4. At 3 and 12 months, details of survival, activities of daily living score, and use of services were recorded. Univariate comparisons between centres were made using the χ2 test and stepwise regression was used to identify associations between centre, case mix, therapy provision, and outcomes.

Results: Of the 4048 patients registered, 23% were lost to follow up and 38% had died at 1 year. The proportions of survivors who felt they needed assistance at 12 months ranged from 35% in Italy to 77% in UK2. There were comparatively high amounts of therapy provided up to 1 year in UK3, France and Germany 1, mainly at home. At 1 year, social services were still providing support in UK1, UK5 and France, with some support in Germany 1 and family support was provided in France.

In multivariate analysis, after adjustment for case mix and receipt of rehabilitation, non-UK centres had improved activities of daily living (p<0.001). Older age was indicative of more need for assistance, but less likelihood of assistance from the family. Those in France were more likely to get assistance from their family than any other centre. Mainland European patients were more likely to get help from their family than those in the UK. Patients in all areas except UK2 and UK3 were more likely to be dead or dependent at 1 year than patients in UK1.

Conclusions: There were significant variations in the pathways of care for stroke across European centres in the mid 1990s, which were associated with variation in outcome, and remain unexplained. Family support is more prevalent in southern Europe and service support more prevalent in the UK.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (65.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beech R., Ratcliffe M., Tilling K., Wolfe C. Hospital services for stroke care. A European Perspective. European Study of Stroke Care. Stroke. 1996 Nov;27(11):1958–1964. doi: 10.1161/01.str.27.11.1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bhalla A., Tilling K., Kolominsky-Rabas P., Heuschmann P., Megherbi S. E., Czlonkowska A., Kobayashi A., Mendel T., Giroud M., Rudd A. Variation in the management of acute physiological parameters after ischaemic stroke: a European perspective. Eur J Neurol. 2003 Jan;10(1):25–33. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00504.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Counsell Carl, Dennis Martin, McDowall Michael, Warlow Charles. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1041–1047. doi: 10.1161/hs0402.105909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heller R., O'Connell R., Lim L., Aggrawal A., Nogueira A., Alvares Salis L. H., Jialiang W., Qian W., Kuaban C., Muna W. Variation in in-patient stroke management in ten centres in different countries: the INCLEN multicentre stroke collaboration. J Neurol Sci. 1999 Aug 1;167(1):11–15. doi: 10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00064-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Indredavik B., Bakke F., Slordahl S. A., Rokseth R., Hâheim L. L. Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: which aspects are most important? Stroke. 1999 May;30(5):917–923. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.5.917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Weir N. U., Sandercock P. A., Lewis S. C., Signorini D. F., Warlow C. P. Variations between countries in outcome after stroke in the International Stroke Trial (IST). Stroke. 2001 Jun;32(6):1370–1377. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.6.1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wolfe C. D., Tilling K., Beech R., Rudd A. G. Variations in case fatality and dependency from stroke in western and central Europe. The European BIOMED Study of Stroke Care Group. Stroke. 1999 Feb;30(2):350–356. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.2.350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wolfe C., Rudd A., Dennis M., Warlow C., Langhorne P. Taking acute stroke care seriously. In the absence of evidence we should manage acute stroke as a medical emergency. BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):5–6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES