Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2004 Feb;75(2):280–286.

False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports

H Wiedemayer 1, I Sandalcioglu 1, W Armbruster 1, J Regel 1, H Schaefer 1, D Stolke 1
PMCID: PMC1738927  PMID: 14742605

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the sensitivity of intraoperative monitoring in neurosurgical operations using somatosensory evoked potentials and to identify reasons for false negative findings and possible settings with an increased risk for monitoring failure.

Methods: SEP monitoring of 658 neurosurgical operations was analysed. The target of monitoring was the function of a hemisphere in 251 cases, the brain stem in 198 cases, and the spinal cord in 209 cases.

Results: In 27 cases (4.1%), monitoring was classified as false negative. Further analysis showed that five of these patients had experienced delayed neurological damage. Among the remaining 22 false negative cases, 14 had a minor neurological deficit and eight had severe neurological damage. Overall sensitivity and negative predictive value of SEP monitoring was 79% and 96%, respectively. For the detection of severe neurological damage the corresponding figures were 91% and 98%. Sensitivity of monitoring varied depending on the target of monitoring and the type of lesion. Monitoring was less likely to detect neurological damage in surgery for infratentorial tumours with brain stem compression, small lesions of the motor cortex, and small vessel damage during aneurysm surgery.

Conclusions: SEP monitoring has acceptable sensitivity for detecting neurological damage during different neurosurgical procedures. Distinct settings with an increased risk of monitoring failure can be identified. In these cases measures to enhance the sensitivity of monitoring should be considered.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (356.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bejjani G. K., Nora P. C., Vera P. L., Broemling L., Sekhar L. N. The predictive value of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential monitoring: review of 244 procedures. Neurosurgery. 1998 Sep;43(3):491–500. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199809000-00050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ben-David B., Haller G., Taylor P. Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia. A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987 Jul-Aug;12(6):536–539. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198707000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daube J. R. Intraoperative monitoring by evoked potentials for spinal cord surgery: the pros. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov;73(5):374–377. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90085-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dawson E. G., Sherman J. E., Kanim L. E., Nuwer M. R. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991 Aug;16(8 Suppl):S361–S364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dowman R., Boisvert D. P., Gelb A. W., Tang C., Lam A. M., Meilke B. Changes in the somatosensory evoked potential during and immediately following temporary middle cerebral artery occlusion predict somatosensory cortex ischemic lesions in monkeys. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;7(2):269–281. doi: 10.1097/00004691-199004000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fisher R. S., Raudzens P., Nunemacher M. Efficacy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;12(1):97–109. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forbes H. J., Allen P. W., Waller C. S., Jones S. J., Edgar M. A., Webb P. J., Ransford A. O. Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 May;73(3):487–491. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B3.1670455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedman W. A., Chadwick G. M., Verhoeven F. J., Mahla M., Day A. L. Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during surgery for middle cerebral artery aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1991 Jul;29(1):83–88. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199107000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Friedman W. A., Grundy B. L. Monitoring of sensory evoked potentials is highly reliable and helpful in the operating room. J Clin Monit. 1987 Jan;3(1):38–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00770882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Friedman W. A., Kaplan B. L., Day A. L., Sypert G. W., Curran M. T. Evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm operation: observations after fifty cases. Neurosurgery. 1987 May;20(5):678–687. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198705000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guerit J. M., Witdoeckt C., Verhelst R., Matta A. J., Jacquet L. M., Dion R. A. Sensitivity, specificity, and surgical impact of somatosensory evoked potentials in descending aorta surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):1943–1958. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00414-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guérit J. M., Witdoeckt C., de Tourtchaninoff M., Ghariani S., Matta A., Dion R., Verhelst R. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery. I. Relationships between qualitative SEP alterations and intraoperative events. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Nov;104(6):459–469. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(97)00022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Haupt W. F., Horsch S. Evoked potential monitoring in carotid surgery: a review of 994 cases. Neurology. 1992 Apr;42(4):835–838. doi: 10.1212/wnl.42.4.835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kombos T., Suess O., Ciklatekerlio O., Brock M. Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg. 2001 Oct;95(4):608–614. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.4.0608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Krieger D., Adams H. P., Albert F., von Haken M., Hacke W. Pure motor hemiparesis with stable somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during aneurysm surgery: case report. Neurosurgery. 1992 Jul;31(1):145–150. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199207000-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lesser R. P., Raudzens P., Lüders H., Nuwer M. R., Goldie W. D., Morris H. H., 3rd, Dinner D. S., Klem G., Hahn J. F., Shetter A. G. Postoperative neurological deficits may occur despite unchanged intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials. Ann Neurol. 1986 Jan;19(1):22–25. doi: 10.1002/ana.410190105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Linstedt U., Maier C., Petry A. Intraoperative monitoring with somatosensory evoked potentials in carotid artery surgery--less reliable in patients with preoperative neurologic deficiency? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jan;42(1):13–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05074.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Little J. R., Lesser R. P., Luders H. Electrophysiological monitoring during basilar aneurysm operation. Neurosurgery. 1987 Mar;20(3):421–427. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198703000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Manninen P. H. Monitoring evoked potentials during spinal surgery in one institution. Can J Anaesth. 1998 May;45(5 Pt 1):460–465. doi: 10.1007/BF03012582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Manninen P. H., Patterson S., Lam A. M., Gelb A. W., Nantau W. E. Evoked potential monitoring during posterior fossa aneurysm surgery: a comparison of two modalities. Can J Anaesth. 1994 Feb;41(2):92–97. doi: 10.1007/BF03009798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Matthies C., Samii M. Management of vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the value of neurophysiology for evaluation and prediction of auditory function in 420 cases. Neurosurgery. 1997 May;40(5):919–930. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199705000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. May D. M., Jones S. J., Crockard H. A. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in cervical surgery: identification of pre- and intraoperative risk factors associated with neurological deterioration. J Neurosurg. 1996 Oct;85(4):566–573. doi: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.4.0566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Mizoi K., Yoshimoto T. Permissible temporary occlusion time in aneurysm surgery as evaluated by evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery. 1993 Sep;33(3):434–440. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199309000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Molaie M. False negative intraoperative somatosensory evoked potentials with simultaneous bilateral stimulation. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1986 Jan;17(1):6–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Noonan Kenneth J., Walker Timothy, Feinberg Judy R., Nagel Michelle, Didelot William, Lindseth Richard. Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 Apr 15;27(8):825–830. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200204150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nuwer M. R., Dawson E. G., Carlson L. G., Kanim L. E., Sherman J. E. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;96(1):6–11. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)00235-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Radtke R. A., Erwin C. W., Wilkins R. H. Intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potentials: significant decrease in postoperative morbidity. Neurology. 1989 Feb;39(2 Pt 1):187–191. doi: 10.1212/wnl.39.2.187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schramm J., Koht A., Schmidt G., Pechstein U., Taniguchi M., Fahlbusch R. Surgical and electrophysiological observations during clipping of 134 aneurysms with evoked potential monitoring. Neurosurgery. 1990 Jan;26(1):61–70. doi: 10.1097/00006123-199001000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wiedemayer Helmut, Fauser Barbara, Sandalcioglu Ibrahim Erol, Schäfer Heike, Stolke Dietmar. The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions: a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg. 2002 Feb;96(2):255–262. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.2.0255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiedemayer Helmut, Schaefer Heike, Armbruster W., Miller M., Stolke Dietmar. Observations on intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring in the semi-sitting position. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec;113(12):1993–1997. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00302-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES