Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2004 Mar;75(3):401–405. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.018085

Predicting functional outcome in acute stroke: comparison of a simple six variable model with other predictive systems and informal clinical prediction

C Counsell 1, M Dennis 1, M McDowall 1
PMCID: PMC1738951  PMID: 14966155

Abstract

Background: Statistical models that predict functional outcome after stroke using six simple variables (SSV) have recently been developed and validated.

Objective: To compare the accuracy of these models with other simple ways of predicting outcome soon after stroke.

Methods: The SSV model for being alive and independent (modified Rankin score ⩽2) six months or one year after stroke was compared with predictions based on a model that included only age and Oxford community stroke project classification, with predictions based on conscious level and urinary continence, and with informal clinical predictions made by clinicians interested in stroke. Predictions were compared in an independent hospital based cohort of stroke patients using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results: The SSV model at six months had a significantly greater area under the curve (0.84) than the model with only age and stroke classification (0.75). Predictions based on conscious level and urinary continence were no better than those of the SSV model and were unable to predict subjects with a high probability of good outcome. The sensitivity and specificity for informal clinical predictions at one year lay on or below the SSV model curve, implying that the SSV model was at least as good as clinical predictions.

Conclusions: The SSV models performed as well as or better than other simple predictive systems. These models will be useful in epidemiological studies but should not be used to guide clinical management until their impact on patient care and outcome has been evaluated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (304.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bamford J., Sandercock P., Dennis M., Burn J., Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet. 1991 Jun 22;337(8756):1521–1526. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93206-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barlow P., Teasdale G. Prediction of outcome and the management of severe head injuries: the attitudes of neurosurgeons. Neurosurgery. 1986 Dec;19(6):989–991. doi: 10.1227/00006123-198612000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Counsell C., Dennis M. Systematic review of prognostic models in patients with acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;12(3):159–170. doi: 10.1159/000047699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Counsell Carl, Dennis Martin, McDowall Michael, Warlow Charles. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke. 2002 Apr;33(4):1041–1047. doi: 10.1161/hs0402.105909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dyker A. G., Weir C. J., Lees K. R. Influence of cholesterol on survival after stroke: retrospective study. BMJ. 1997 May 31;314(7094):1584–1588. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7094.1584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gladman J. R., Harwood D. M., Barer D. H. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: prospective evaluation of five multivariate models and comparison with simple methods. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 May;55(5):347–351. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.5.347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lindley R. I., Warlow C. P., Wardlaw J. M., Dennis M. S., Slattery J., Sandercock P. A. Interobserver reliability of a clinical classification of acute cerebral infarction. Stroke. 1993 Dec;24(12):1801–1804. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.12.1801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wade D. T., Hewer R. L. Outlook after an acute stroke: urinary incontinence and loss of consciousness compared in 532 patients. Q J Med. 1985 Sep;56(221):601–608. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Weir C. J., Murray G. D., Dyker A. G., Lees K. R. Is hyperglycaemia an independent predictor of poor outcome after acute stroke? Results of a long-term follow up study. BMJ. 1997 May 3;314(7090):1303–1306. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7090.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Weir N. U., Counsell C. E., McDowall M., Gunkel A., Dennis M. S. Reliability of the variables in a new set of models that predict outcome after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;74(4):447–451. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.4.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES