Abstract
Background: In mild head injury, predictors to select patients for computed tomography (CT) and/or to plan proper management are needed. The strength of evidence of published recommendations is insufficient for current use. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and the clinical validity of the proposal of the Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies on mild head injury from an emergency department perspective.
Methods: In a three year period, 5578 adolescent and adult subjects were prospectively recruited and managed according to the proposed protocol. Outcome measures were: (a) any post-traumatic lesion; (b) need for neurosurgical intervention; (c) unfavourable outcome (death, permanent vegetative state or severe disability) after six months. The predictive value of a model based on five variables (Glasgow coma score, clinical findings, risk factors, neurological deficits, and skull fracture) was tested by logistic regression analysis.
Findings: At first CT evaluation 327 patients (5.9%) had intracranial post-traumatic lesions. In 16 cases (0.3%) previously undiagnosed lesions were detected after re-evaluation within seven days. Neurosurgical intervention was needed in 71 patients (1.3%) and an unfavourable outcome occurred in 39 cases (0.7%). The area under the ROC curve of the variables in predicting post-traumatic lesions was 0.906 (0.009) (sensitivity 70.0%, specificity 94.1% at best cut off), neurosurgical intervention was 0.926 (0.016) (sensitivity 81.7%, specificity 94.1%), and unfavourable outcome was 0.953 (0.014) (sensitivity 88.1%, specificity 95.1%).
Interpretation: The variables prove highly accurate in the prediction of clinically meaningful outcomes, when applied to a consecutive set of patients with mild head injury in the clinical setting of a 1st level emergency department.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (358.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Dickinson K., Bunn F., Wentz R., Edwards P., Roberts I. Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies. BMJ. 2000 May 13;320(7245):1308–1311. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7245.1308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Galbraith S. Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis in traumatic intracranial haematoma. Br Med J. 1976 Jun 12;1(6023):1438–1439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.6023.1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ghajar J. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 2000 Sep 9;356(9233):923–929. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02689-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graham I. D., Stiell I. G., Laupacis A., O'Connor A. M., Wells G. A. Emergency physicians' attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):134–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02598.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gómez P. A., Lobato R. D., Ortega J. M., De La Cruz J. Mild head injury: differences in prognosis among patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15 and analysis of factors associated with abnormal CT findings. Br J Neurosurg. 1996 Oct;10(5):453–460. doi: 10.1080/02688699647078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29–36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haydel M. J., Preston C. A., Mills T. J., Luber S., Blaudeau E., DeBlieux P. M. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jul 13;343(2):100–105. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jagoda Andy S., Cantrill Stephen V., Wears Robert L., Valadka Alex, Gallagher E. John, Gottesfeld Steven H., Pietrzak Michael P., Bolden Jason, Bruns John J., Jr, Zimmerman Robert. Clinical policy: neuroimaging and decisionmaking in adult mild traumatic brain injury in the acute setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2002 Aug;40(2):231–249. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.125782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laupacis A., Sekar N., Stiell I. G. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. JAMA. 1997 Feb 12;277(6):488–494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marshall L. F., Toole B. M., Bowers S. A. The National Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Part 2: Patients who talk and deteriorate: implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 1983 Aug;59(2):285–288. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.2.0285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Masters S. J., McClean P. M., Arcarese J. S., Brown R. F., Campbell J. A., Freed H. A., Hess G. H., Hoff J. T., Kobrine A., Koziol D. F. Skull x-ray examinations after head trauma. Recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel and validation study. N Engl J Med. 1987 Jan 8;316(2):84–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198701083160205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pezzilli R., Morselli-Labate A. M., Miniero R., Barakat B., Fiocchi M., Cappelletti O. Simultaneous serum assays of lipase and interleukin-6 for early diagnosis and prognosis of acute pancreatitis. Clin Chem. 1999 Oct;45(10):1762–1767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Servadei F., Teasdale G., Merry G., Neurotraumatology Committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Defining acute mild head injury in adults: a proposal based on prognostic factors, diagnosis, and management. J Neurotrauma. 2001 Jul;18(7):657–664. doi: 10.1089/089771501750357609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Servadei Franco, Verlicchi Angela, Soldano Franca, Zanotti Bruno, Piffer Silvano. Descriptive epidemiology of head injury in Romagna and Trentino. Comparison between two geographically different Italian regions. Neuroepidemiology. 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):297–304. doi: 10.1159/000065523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein S. C., Ross S. E. Mild head injury: a plea for routine early CT scanning. J Trauma. 1992 Jul;33(1):11–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., Lesiuk H., Wells G. A., McKnight R. D., Brison R., Clement C., Eisenhauer M. A., Greenberg G. H., MacPhail I., Reardon M. The Canadian CT Head Rule Study for patients with minor head injury: rationale, objectives, and methodology for phase I (derivation). Ann Emerg Med. 2001 Aug;38(2):160–169. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.116796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stiell I. G., Wells G. A., Vandemheen K., Clement C., Lesiuk H., Laupacis A., McKnight R. D., Verbeek R., Brison R., Cass D. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet. 2001 May 5;357(9266):1391–1396. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04561-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teasdale G. M., Pettigrew L. E., Wilson J. T., Murray G., Jennett B. Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):587–597. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornhill S., Teasdale G. M., Murray G. D., McEwen J., Roy C. W., Penny K. I. Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2000 Jun 17;320(7250):1631–1635. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7250.1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Voss M., Knottenbelt J. D., Peden M. M. Patients who reattend after head injury: a high risk group. BMJ. 1995 Nov 25;311(7017):1395–1398. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7017.1395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zweig M. H., Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993 Apr;39(4):561–577. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]