Skip to main content
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2004 Sep;75(9):1275–1280. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.015032

Mild cognitive impairment: a cross-national comparison

E Arnaiz 1, O Almkvist 1, R Ivnik 1, E Tangalos 1, L Wahlund 1, B Winblad 1, R Petersen 1
PMCID: PMC1739239  PMID: 15314114

Abstract

Objective: The main aim of this collaborative study was to assess the comparability of the most commonly used criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by comparing the cognitive performance of patients with MCI from the Mayo Clinic (USA) and the Karolinska Institutet (Sweden).

Methods: Standardised neuropsychological test scores were used to compare the two samples from the two institutions with regard to the number of cognitive domains in which performance was below 1.5 SD. Possible predictors for the conversion from MCI to Alzheimer's disease (AD) were assessed.

Results: When the two institutions were considered together in the Cox proportional hazard model, the number of affected cognitive domains below 1.5 SD was a significant predictor of time to AD diagnosis with age, education, and APOE ε4 genotype entered into the same model as covariates. The number of affected cognitive areas remained as a significant predictor when the institutions were considered separately. The logistic regression model of conversion to AD showed that only tests assessing learning and retention were predictors of developing AD.

Conclusions: Differences in population as well as in methodology of case ascertainment as well as other aspects may account for the observed variability between samples of patients with MCI. The number of impaired cognitive factors at baseline can predict the progression from MCI to AD. Furthermore, tests assessing learning and retention are the best predictors for progression to AD.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (108.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Albert M. S., Moss M. B., Tanzi R., Jones K. Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2001 Jul;7(5):631–639. doi: 10.1017/s1355617701755105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almkvist O., Basun H., Bäckman L., Herlitz A., Lannfelt L., Small B., Viitanen M., Wahlund L. O., Winblad B. Mild cognitive impairment--an early stage of Alzheimer's disease? J Neural Transm Suppl. 1998;54:21–29. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-7508-8_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bozoki A., Giordani B., Heidebrink J. L., Berent S., Foster N. L. Mild cognitive impairments predict dementia in nondemented elderly patients with memory loss. Arch Neurol. 2001 Mar;58(3):411–416. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.3.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Elias M. F., Beiser A., Wolf P. A., Au R., White R. F., D'Agostino R. B. The preclinical phase of alzheimer disease: A 22-year prospective study of the Framingham Cohort. Arch Neurol. 2000 Jun;57(6):808–813. doi: 10.1001/archneur.57.6.808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Folstein M. F., Folstein S. E., McHugh P. R. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grober E., Lipton R. B., Hall C., Crystal H. Memory impairment on free and cued selective reminding predicts dementia. Neurology. 2000 Feb 22;54(4):827–832. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.4.827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ivnik R. J., Smith G. E., Lucas J. A., Tangalos E. G., Kokmen E., Petersen R. C. Free and cued selective reminding test: MOANS norms. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1997 Oct;19(5):676–691. doi: 10.1080/01688639708403753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jacobs D. M., Sano M., Dooneief G., Marder K., Bell K. L., Stern Y. Neuropsychological detection and characterization of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1995 May;45(5):957–962. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.5.957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kokmen E., Naessens J. M., Offord K. P. A short test of mental status: description and preliminary results. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Apr;62(4):281–288. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61905-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kokmen E., Smith G. E., Petersen R. C., Tangalos E., Ivnik R. C. The short test of mental status. Correlations with standardized psychometric testing. Arch Neurol. 1991 Jul;48(7):725–728. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1991.00530190071018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lambert J-C, Araria-Goumidi L., Myllykangas L., Ellis C., Wang J. C., Bullido M. J., Harris J. M., Artiga M. J., Hernandez D., Kwon J. M. Contribution of APOE promoter polymorphisms to Alzheimer's disease risk. Neurology. 2002 Jul 9;59(1):59–66. doi: 10.1212/wnl.59.1.59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McKhann G., Drachman D., Folstein M., Katzman R., Price D., Stadlan E. M. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984 Jul;34(7):939–944. doi: 10.1212/wnl.34.7.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Petersen R. C., Doody R., Kurz A., Mohs R. C., Morris J. C., Rabins P. V., Ritchie K., Rossor M., Thal L., Winblad B. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2001 Dec;58(12):1985–1992. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Petersen R. C., Smith G. E., Ivnik R. J., Kokmen E., Tangalos E. G. Memory function in very early Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1994 May;44(5):867–872. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.5.867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Petersen R. C., Smith G. E., Ivnik R. J., Tangalos E. G., Schaid D. J., Thibodeau S. N., Kokmen E., Waring S. C., Kurland L. T. Apolipoprotein E status as a predictor of the development of Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired individuals. JAMA. 1995 Apr 26;273(16):1274–1278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Petersen R. C., Smith G. E., Waring S. C., Ivnik R. J., Tangalos E. G., Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999 Mar;56(3):303–308. doi: 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ritchie K., Touchon J. Mild cognitive impairment: conceptual basis and current nosological status. Lancet. 2000 Jan 15;355(9199):225–228. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06155-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rosen W. G., Terry R. D., Fuld P. A., Katzman R., Peck A. Pathological verification of ischemic score in differentiation of dementias. Ann Neurol. 1980 May;7(5):486–488. doi: 10.1002/ana.410070516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Rubin E. H., Morris J. C., Grant E. A., Vendegna T. Very mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. I. Clinical assessment. Arch Neurol. 1989 Apr;46(4):379–382. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520400033016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tierney M. C., Szalai J. P., Snow W. G., Fisher R. H., Nores A., Nadon G., Dunn E., St George-Hyslop P. H. Prediction of probable Alzheimer's disease in memory-impaired patients: A prospective longitudinal study. Neurology. 1996 Mar;46(3):661–665. doi: 10.1212/wnl.46.3.661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wahlund Lars-Olof, Pihlstrand Eva, Jönhagen Maria Eriksdotter. Mild cognitive impairment: experience from a memory clinic. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2003;179:21–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES