Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2005 Dec;76(12):1677–1681. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.065227

Psychometric evaluation of the multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29) for proxy use

F A H van der Linden 1, J Kragt 1, M Klein 1, H M van der Ploeg 1, C Polman 1, B Uitdehaag 1
PMCID: PMC1739474  PMID: 16291893

Abstract

Background: There may be difficulties in the use of self report measurements in patients with cognitive impairment or serious mood disturbances which interfere with reliable self assessment, as may be the case in multiple sclerosis (MS). In such cases proxies may provide valuable information. However, before using any questionnaires in a proxy sample, the questionnaire should be evaluated for proxy use.

Objective: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the 29 item Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) when used by proxies of MS patients.

Methods: A sample of 62 partners of MS patients completed the MSIS-29. The data were evaluated for the psychometric criteria of the MSIS-29, including data quality, scaling assumptions, acceptability, reliability, validity, and responsiveness.

Results: Psychometric evaluation was satisfactory; data quality was high, and scaling assumptions and acceptability were good. Reliability was high (α>0.80). Findings were consistent with results of a psychometric evaluation in a patient sample.

Conclusions: The MSIS-29 can be used reliably in proxies of patients with MS. As a next step the relation between data obtained from patients and proxies needs to be studied, focusing on factors that may affect agreement and discrepancies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (64.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Benedict R. H. B., Fishman I., McClellan M. M., Bakshi R., Weinstock-Guttman B. Validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003 Aug;9(4):393–396. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms902oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benedict R. H. B., Munschauer F., Linn R., Miller C., Murphy E., Foley F., Jacobs L. Screening for multiple sclerosis cognitive impairment using a self-administered 15-item questionnaire. Mult Scler. 2003 Feb;9(1):95–101. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms861oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benedict Ralph H. B., Cox Darcy, Thompson Laetitia L., Foley Fred, Weinstock-Guttman Bianca, Munschauer Frederick. Reliable screening for neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2004 Dec;10(6):675–678. doi: 10.1191/1352458504ms1098oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gold Stefan M., Schulz Holger, Mönch Andrea, Schulz Karl-Heinz, Heesen Christoph. Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis does not affect reliability and validity of self-report health measures. Mult Scler. 2003 Aug;9(4):404–410. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms927oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Goverover Yael, Chiaravalloti Nancy, DeLuca John. The relationship between self-awareness of neurobehavioral symptoms, cognitive functioning, and emotional symptoms in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2005 Apr;11(2):203–212. doi: 10.1191/1352458505ms1153oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hanita M. Self-report measures of patient utility: should we trust them? J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 May;53(5):469–476. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00205-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Janssens A. C. J. W., van Doorn P. A., de Boer J. B., Kalkers N. F., van der Meche F. G. A., Passchier J., Hintzen R. Q. Anxiety and depression influence the relation between disability status and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003 Aug;9(4):397–403. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms930oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Juniper E. F., Guyatt G. H., Willan A., Griffith L. E. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jan;47(1):81–87. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90036-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kenealy P. M., Beaumont G. J., Lintern T., Murrell R. Autobiographical memory, depression and quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Feb;22(1):125–131. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200002)22:1;1-8;FT125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maor Y., Olmer L., Mozes B. The relation between objective and subjective impairment in cognitive function among multiple sclerosis patients--the role of depression. Mult Scler. 2001 Apr;7(2):131–135. doi: 10.1177/135245850100700209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Marrie Ruth Ann, Miller Deborah M., Chelune Gordon J., Cohen Jeffrey A. Validity and reliability of the MSQLI in cognitively impaired patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2003 Dec;9(6):621–626. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms971oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Norman G. R., Stratford P., Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;50(8):869–879. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00097-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rao S. M., Leo G. J., Bernardin L., Unverzagt F. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology. 1991 May;41(5):685–691. doi: 10.1212/wnl.41.5.685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Riazi A., Hobart J. C., Lamping D. L., Fitzpatrick R., Thompson A. J. Evidence-based measurement in multiple sclerosis: the psychometric properties of the physical and psychological dimensions of three quality of life rating scales. Mult Scler. 2003 Aug;9(4):411–419. doi: 10.1191/1352458503ms929oa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Riazi A., Hobart J. C., Lamping D. L., Fitzpatrick R., Thompson A. J. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): reliability and validity in hospital based samples. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;73(6):701–704. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.6.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Riemsma R. P., Forbes C. A., Glanville J. M., Eastwood A. J., Kleijnen J. General health status measures for people with cognitive impairment: learning disability and acquired brain injury. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(6):1–100. doi: 10.3310/hta5060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sneeuw Kommer C. A., Sprangers Mirjam A. G., Aaronson Neil K. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002 Nov;55(11):1130–1143. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00479-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

[Lay Summary]
jnnpsyc_76_12_1677__index.html (1.2KB, html)
jnnpsyc_76_12_1677__1.pdf (15KB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES