Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2005 Feb;76(2):196–199. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.037135

Comparison of intra-arterial thrombolysis with conventional treatment in patients with acute central retinal artery occlusion

M Arnold 1, U Koerner 1, L Remonda 1, K Nedeltchev 1, H Mattle 1, G Schroth 1, M Sturzenegger 1, J Weber 1, F Koerner 1
PMCID: PMC1739521  PMID: 15654031

Abstract

Background: Several case series and a recent meta-analysis indicate that intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) is effective for the treatment of acute central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

Methods: A total of 37 patients with acute monocular blindness because of unilateral thromboembolic CRAO were treated with IAT using urokinase within six hours of the onset of symptoms. Visual outcome was compared with a control group of 19 patients, also seen within six hours, who did not undergo thrombolytic treatment. In both groups some patients were treated by paracentesis and/or acetazolamide. Predictors of visual outcome were evaluated.

Results: Visual improvement was more likely with IAT (p = 0.01) as were the chances to regain visual acuity of >0.6 significantly better (p = 0.04): 8/37 patients (22%) regained visual acuity of >0.6 in the IAT group and none (0/19) in the control group. Younger patients were more likely to regain some vision with (p = 0.012) or without IAT (p = 0.026). Three patients had minor treatment related cerebral ischaemic events, two had transient ischaemic attacks and one a minor stroke. There were no haemorrhagic complications.

Conclusions: This series of patients with CRAO demonstrated that IAT enhanced the chances of visual improvement compared with conventional treatment only. Furthermore, younger patients have a better chance to achieve some visual recovery.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (88.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Adams H. P., Jr, Bendixen B. H., Kappelle L. J., Biller J., Love B. B., Gordon D. L., Marsh E. E., 3rd Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke. 1993 Jan;24(1):35–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold Marcel, Schroth Gerhard, Nedeltchev Krassen, Loher Thomas, Remonda Luca, Stepper Frank, Sturzenegger Matthias, Mattle Heinrich P. Intra-arterial thrombolysis in 100 patients with acute stroke due to middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke. 2002 Jul;33(7):1828–1833. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000020713.89227.b7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Atebara N. H., Brown G. C., Cater J. Efficacy of anterior chamber paracentesis and Carbogen in treating acute nonarteritic central retinal artery occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1995 Dec;102(12):2029–2035. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)30758-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Augsburger J. J., Magargal L. E. Visual prognosis following treatment of acute central retinal artery obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol. 1980 Dec;64(12):913–917. doi: 10.1136/bjo.64.12.913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beatty S., Au Eong K. G. Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis for acute occlusion of the central retinal artery: a meta-analysis of the published data. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;84(8):914–916. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.8.914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayreh S. S., Kolder H. E., Weingeist T. A. Central retinal artery occlusion and retinal tolerance time. Ophthalmology. 1980 Jan;87(1):75–78. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(80)35283-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kaste Markku. Approval of alteplase in Europe: will it change stroke management? Lancet Neurol. 2003 Apr;2(4):207–208. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00343-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Marler J. R., Tilley B. C., Lu M., Brott T. G., Lyden P. C., Grotta J. C., Broderick J. P., Levine S. R., Frankel M. P., Horowitz S. H. Early stroke treatment associated with better outcome: the NINDS rt-PA stroke study. Neurology. 2000 Dec 12;55(11):1649–1655. doi: 10.1212/wnl.55.11.1649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Richard G., Lerche R. C., Knospe V., Zeumer H. Treatment of retinal arterial occlusion with local fibrinolysis using recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. Ophthalmology. 1999 Apr;106(4):768–773. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90165-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schmidt D., Schumacher M., Wakhloo A. K. Microcatheter urokinase infusion in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr 15;113(4):429–434. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76167-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt Dieter P., Schulte-Mönting Jürgen, Schumacher Martin. Prognosis of central retinal artery occlusion: local intraarterial fibrinolysis versus conservative treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002 Sep;23(8):1301–1307. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Ueda T., Sakaki S., Kumon Y., Ohta S. Multivariable analysis of predictive factors related to outcome at 6 months after intra-arterial thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 1999 Nov;30(11):2360–2365. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.11.2360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Weber J., Remonda L., Mattle H. P., Koerner U., Baumgartner R. W., Sturzenegger M., Ozdoba C., Koerner F., Schroth G. Selective intra-arterial fibrinolysis of acute central retinal artery occlusion. Stroke. 1998 Oct;29(10):2076–2079. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.10.2076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES