Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry logoLink to Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
. 2005 Jun;76(6):788–792. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.042267

Neurodevelopmental treatment after stroke: a comparative study

T Hafsteinsdottir 1, A Algra 1, L Kappelle 1, M Grypdonck 1, b on 1
PMCID: PMC1739651  PMID: 15897499

Abstract

Background: Neurodevelopmental treatment (NDT) is a rehabilitation approach increasingly used in the care of stroke patients, although no evidence has been provided for its efficacy.

Objective: To investigate the effects of NDT on the functional status and quality of life (QoL) of patients with stroke during one year after stroke onset.

Methods: 324 consecutive patients with stroke from 12 Dutch hospitals were included in a prospective, non-randomised, parallel group study. In the experimental group (n = 223), nurses and physiotherapists from six neurological wards used the NDT approach, while conventional treatment was used in six control wards (n = 101). Functional status was assessed by the Barthel index. Primary outcome was "poor outcome", defined as Barthel index <12 or death after one year. QoL was assessed with the 30 item version of the sickness impact profile (SA-SIP30) and the visual analogue scale.

Results: At 12 months, 59 patients (27%) in the NDT group and 24 (24%) in the non-NDT group had poor outcome (corresponding adjusted odds ratio = 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 3.5)). At discharge the adjusted odds ratio was 0.8 (0.4 to 1.5) and after six months it was 1.6 (0.8 to 3.2). Adjusted mean differences in the two QoL measures showed no significant differences between the study groups at six or 12 months after stroke onset.

Conclusions: The NDT approach was not found effective in the care of stroke patients in the hospital setting. Health care professionals need to reconsider the use of this approach.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (87.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ahlsiö B., Britton M., Murray V., Theorell T. Disablement and quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 1984 Sep-Oct;15(5):886–890. doi: 10.1161/01.str.15.5.886. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bamford J. M., Sandercock P. A., Warlow C. P., Slattery J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1989 Jun;20(6):828–828. doi: 10.1161/01.str.20.6.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basmajian J. V., Gowland C. A., Finlayson M. A., Hall A. L., Swanson L. R., Stratford P. W., Trotter J. E., Brandstater M. E. Stroke treatment: comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 May;68(5 Pt 1):267–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dickstein R., Hocherman S., Pillar T., Shaham R. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther. 1986 Aug;66(8):1233–1238. doi: 10.1093/ptj/66.8.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gibbon B. Implications for nurses in approaches to the management of stroke rehabilitation: a review of the literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 1993 Apr;30(2):133–141. doi: 10.1016/0020-7489(93)90063-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hafsteinsdóttir T. B. Neurodevelopmental treatment: application to nursing and effects on the hemiplegic stroke patient. J Neurosci Nurs. 1996 Feb;28(1):36–47. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199602000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kempen G. I., Brilman E. I., Ormel J. De Mini-Mental State Examination. Normeringsgegevens en een vergelijking van een 12- en 20-item versie in een steekproef ouderen uit de bevolking. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1995 Aug;26(4):163–172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee R. G., van Donkelaar P. Mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. Can J Neurol Sci. 1995 Nov;22(4):257–263. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100039445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lewis N. A. Functional gains in CVA patients: a nursing approach. Rehabil Nurs. 1986 Mar-Apr;11(2):25–27. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.1986.tb00717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Logigian M. K., Samuels M. A., Falconer J., Zagar R. Clinical exercise trial for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Aug;64(8):364–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lord J. P., Hall K. Neuromuscular reeducation versus traditional programs for stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Feb;67(2):88–91. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90108-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MAHONEY F. I., BARTHEL D. W. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mulder T., Hulstijn W., van der Meer J. EMG feedback and the restoration of motor control. A controlled group study of 12 hemiparetic patients. Am J Phys Med. 1986 Aug;65(4):173–188. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nudo R. J., Friel K. M. Cortical plasticity after stroke: implications for rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1999;155(9):713–717. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nydevik I., Hulter-Asberg K. Sickness impact after stroke. A 3-year follow-up. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992 Dec;10(4):284–289. doi: 10.3109/02813439209014075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Schats R., Brilstra E. H., Rinkel G. J. E., Algra A., Van Gijn J. Informed consent in trials for neurological emergencies: the example of subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003 Jul;74(7):988–991. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Teasdale G., Murray G., Parker L., Jennett B. Adding up the Glasgow Coma Score. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1979;28(1):13–16. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-4088-8_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Teasdale T. W., Christensen A. L., Pinner E. M. Psychosocial rehabilitation of cranial trauma and stroke patients. Brain Inj. 1993 Nov-Dec;7(6):535–542. doi: 10.3109/02699059309008181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tinson D. J. How stroke patients spend their days. An observational study of the treatment regime offered to patients in hospital with movement disorders following stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1989 Jan-Mar;11(1):45–49. doi: 10.3109/02599148909166380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wagenaar R. C., Meijer O. G., van Wieringen P. C., Kuik D. J., Hazenberg G. J., Lindeboom J., Wichers F., Rijswijk H. The functional recovery of stroke: a comparison between neuro-developmental treatment and the Brunnstrom method. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990;22(1):1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. de Haan R. J., Limburg M., Van der Meulen J. H., Jacobs H. M., Aaronson N. K. Quality of life after stroke. Impact of stroke type and lesion location. Stroke. 1995 Mar;26(3):402–408. doi: 10.1161/01.str.26.3.402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Straten A., de Haan R. J., Limburg M., Schuling J., Bossuyt P. M., van den Bos G. A. A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the Sickness Impact Profile to assess quality of life (SA-SIP30). Stroke. 1997 Nov;28(11):2155–2161. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.11.2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES