Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2000 Jan;57(1):28–34. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.1.28

Cohort study of occupational risk factors of low back pain in construction workers

U Latza 1, W Karmaus 1, T Sturmer 1, M Steiner 1, A Neth 1, U Rehder 1
PMCID: PMC1739856  PMID: 10711266

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To identify work related risk factors of future low back pain (LBP) in a cohort of construction workers free of LBP at the start of follow up.
METHODS—The Hamburg construction worker study comprises 571 male construction workers who have undergone two comprehensive interview and physical examination surveys. A cohort of 285 subjects without LBP at baseline was identified. After a follow up of 3 years, the 1 year prevalence of self reported LBP was determined in the 230 men followed up (80.7%). Prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of LBP at follow up according to self reported work tasks of construction workers measured at baseline were estimated from Cox's regression models which were adjusted for age, and anthropometric measures.
RESULTS—At follow up 71 out of 230 workers (30.9%) reported LBP during the preceding 12 months. Four work tasks (scaffolding, erecting roof structures, sawing wood, laying large sandstones) with an increased risk of 1 year prevalence of LBP at follow up were further evaluated. After further adjustment for occupation the relative risk was increased for workers who had reported ⩾2 hour/shifts laying large sandstones (PR=2.6; 95% CI 1.1 to 6.5). Work load of bricklayers was additionally estimated by an index on stone load (high exposure: PR=4.0; 95% CI 0.8 to 19.8), and an index for laying huge bricks/blocks (yes/no: PR=1.7; 95% CI 0.5 to 5.7).
CONCLUSIONS—The results suggest that self reported differences in brick characteristics (size and type of stone) and temporal aspects of the work of bricklayers (average hours per shift laying specified stones) can predict the future prevalence of LBP. The data have to be interpreted with caution because multiple risk factors were tested.


Keywords: construction industry; cohort studies; low back pain

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (101.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bombardier C., Kerr M. S., Shannon H. S., Frank J. W. A guide to interpreting epidemiologic studies on the etiology of back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):2047S–2056S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199409151-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bongers P. M., de Winter C. R., Kompier M. A., Hildebrandt V. H. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Oct;19(5):297–312. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holmström E. B., Lindell J., Moritz U. Low back and neck/shoulder pain in construction workers: occupational workload and psychosocial risk factors. Part 1: Relationship to low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992 Jun;17(6):663–671. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199206000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Leboeuf-Yde C., Klougart N., Lauritzen T. How common is low back pain in the Nordic population? Data from a recent study on a middle-aged general Danish population and four surveys previously conducted in the Nordic countries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 Jul 1;21(13):1518–1526. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199607010-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Papageorgiou A. C., Croft P. R., Thomas E., Ferry S., Jayson M. I., Silman A. J. Influence of previous pain experience on the episode incidence of low back pain: results from the South Manchester Back Pain Study. Pain. 1996 Aug;66(2-3):181–185. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(96)03022-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Riihimäki H. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Apr;17(2):81–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Riihimäki H., Viikari-Juntura E., Moneta G., Kuha J., Videman T., Tola S. Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. A three-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Jan 15;19(2):138–142. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rothenbacher D., Brenner H., Arndt V., Fraisse E., Zschenderlein B., Fliedner T. M. Disorders of the back and spine in construction workers. Prevalence and prognostic value for disability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 Jul 1;22(13):1481–1486. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199707010-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Skov T., Deddens J., Petersen M. R., Endahl L. Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Feb;27(1):91–95. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.1.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stürmer T., Luessenhoop S., Neth A., Soyka M., Karmaus W., Toussaint R., Liebs T. R., Rehder U. Construction work and low back disorder. Preliminary findings of the Hamburg Construction Worker Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2558–2563. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199711010-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Viikari-Juntura E., Rauas S., Martikainen R., Kuosma E., Riihimäki H., Takala E. P., Saarenmaa K. Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Aug;22(4):251–259. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES