Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2000 Jan;57(1):35–42. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.1.35

Cross sectional study of a workforce exposed to hand-arm vibration: with objective tests and the Stockholm workshop scales

K McGeoch 1, W Gilmour 1
PMCID: PMC1739862  PMID: 10711267

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—Medical surveillance of workforces exposed to vibration has been recommended with the Stockholm workshop scales. The aims of this study were (a) to evaluate how the results of the objective tests individually and jointly associated with the final Stockholm workshop staging, (b) how this staging related to the history of exposure to vibration, and (c) how different trades were affected by the hazards from vibrating tools.
METHODS—All workers exposed to vibration in a heavy engineering company were examined with a questionnaire and a battery of tests. An assessment of staging by the Stockholm workshop scales was made. Estimates of the daily exposure and lifetime dosage of vibration of the various trades were reached.
RESULTS—The average years of tool use was 23.3 years (range 3-47 years) and the mean lifetime exposure was 11 022 (range 1012-46 125) hours. The individual neurological tests were all strongly associated with the Stockholm neurological staging but the cold provocation test was not associated with the Stockholm vascular staging. Neurological staging was significantly associated with age, years of tool use, and total hours of exposure to vibration, but not with trade or smoking. Vascular staging was significantly associated with age, years of tool use, total hours of exposure to vibration, and trade, but not with smoking. The mean neurological latent period was 19.7 (range 2-40) years and for the vascular component 19.1 (range 2-40) years. These means varied significantly by trade. The overall prevalence of neurological findings of 62% was greater than the overall prevalence of vascular findings, which was 33%.
CONCLUSIONS—(1) The neurological objective tests were found to be of use in neurological staging. The cold provocation test was not associated with the vascular staging and therefore was of little value. (2) Years of tool use was the exposure variable most significantly associated with evidence of damage to neurological component while years of tool use and trade were the variables most associated with vascular damage. (3) The prevalence of neurological symptoms (62%) was greater than the prevalence of vascular symptoms (33%). (4) Dressers and welders have shorter latent periods than platers and fitters.


Keywords: hand-arm vibration syndrome; neurological objective tests

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (255.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bovenzi M., Franzinelli A., Strambi F. Prevalence of vibration-induced white finger and assessment of vibration exposure among travertine workers in Italy. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988;61(1-2):25–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00381604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brammer A. J., Taylor W., Lundborg G. Sensorineural stages of the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Aug;13(4):279–283. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlson W. S., Samueloff S., Taylor W., Wasserman D. E. Instrumentation for measurement of sensory loss in the fingertips. J Occup Med. 1979 Apr;21(4):260–264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coutu-Wakulczyk G., Brammer A. J., Piercy J. E. Association between a quantitative measure of tactile acuity and hand symptoms reported by operators of power tools. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Sep;22(5):873–881. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(97)80084-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ekenvall L., Nilsson B. Y., Gustavsson P. Temperature and vibration thresholds in vibration syndrome. Br J Ind Med. 1986 Dec;43(12):825–829. doi: 10.1136/oem.43.12.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gemne G., Pyykkö I., Taylor W., Pelmear P. L. The Stockholm Workshop scale for the classification of cold-induced Raynaud's phenomenon in the hand-arm vibration syndrome (revision of the Taylor-Pelmear scale). Scand J Work Environ Health. 1987 Aug;13(4):275–278. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Griffin M. J. Measurement, evaluation, and assessment of occupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration. Occup Environ Med. 1997 Feb;54(2):73–89. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.2.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Harada N., Griffin M. J. Factors influencing vibration sense thresholds used to assess occupational exposures to hand transmitted vibration. Br J Ind Med. 1991 Mar;48(3):185–192. doi: 10.1136/oem.48.3.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayward R. A., Griffin M. J. Measures of vibrotactile sensitivity in persons exposed to hand-arm vibration. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1986 Aug;12(4 Spec No):423–427. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lawson I. J., Nevell D. A. Review of objective tests for the hand-arm vibration syndrome. Occup Med (Lond) 1997 Jan;47(1):15–20. doi: 10.1093/occmed/47.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Letz R., Cherniack M. G., Gerr F., Hershman D., Pace P. A cross sectional epidemiological survey of shipyard workers exposed to hand-arm vibration. Br J Ind Med. 1992 Jan;49(1):53–62. doi: 10.1136/oem.49.1.53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McGeoch K. L., Gilmour W. H., Taylor W. Sensorineural objective tests in the assessment of hand-arm vibration syndrome. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Jan;51(1):57–61. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.1.57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Olsen N. Diagnostic tests in Raynaud's phenomena in workers exposed to vibration: a comparative study. Br J Ind Med. 1988 Jun;45(6):426–430. doi: 10.1136/oem.45.6.426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. RENFREW S. Aesthesiometers. Lancet. 1960 May 7;1(7132):1011–1011. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(60)90896-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Renfrew S. Fingertip sensation: a routine neurological test. Lancet. 1969 Feb 22;1(7591):396–397. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)91359-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Swerup C., Nilsson B. Y. Dependence of thermal thresholds in man on the rate of temperature change. Acta Physiol Scand. 1987 Dec;131(4):623–624. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1987.tb08284.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES