Abstract
OBJECTIVES—Previous research has produced conflicting evidence on the relative merits of advancing and delaying shift systems. The current study assessed the effects of the direction of shift rotation within 8 hour systems, upon a range of measures including sleep, on shift alertness, physical health, and psychological wellbeing. METHODS—An abridged version of the standard shiftwork index which included retrospective alertness ratings was completed by four groups of industrial shiftworkers on relatively rapidly rotating 8 hour systems (n=611). Two groups worked continuous systems that were either advancing or delaying; the other two groups worked discontinuous systems that were either advancing or delaying. RESULTS—Few effects were found of direction of rotation on chronic measures of health and wellbeing, even when the systems incorporated "quick returns" (a break of only 8 hours when changing from one shift to another). This was despite the use of measures previously shown to be sensitive to the effects of a broad range of features of shift systems. However, advancing continuous systems seemed to be associated with marginally steeper declines in alertness across the shift (F (3,1080)=2.87, p<0.05). They were also associated with shorter sleeps between morning shifts (F (1,404)=4.01, p<0.05), but longer sleeps between afternoons (F (1,424)=4.16, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS—The absence of negative effects of advancing shifts upon the chronic outcome measures accorded with previous evidence that advancing shifts may not be as harmful as early research indicated. However, this interpretation is tempered by the possibility that difficult shift systems self select those workers most able to cope with their deleterious effects. The presence of quick returns in advancing continuous systems seemed to impact upon some of the acute measures such as duration of sleep, although the associated effects on alertness seemed to be marginal. Keywords: shift rotation; health; alertness
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (134.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Barton J., Folkard S. Advancing versus delaying shift systems. Ergonomics. 1993 Jan-Mar;36(1-3):59–64. doi: 10.1080/00140139308967855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barton J., Folkard S., Smith L., Poole C. J. Effects on health of a change from a delaying to an advancing shift system. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Nov;51(11):749–755. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.11.749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czeisler C. A., Duffy J. F., Shanahan T. L., Brown E. N., Mitchell J. F., Rimmer D. W., Ronda J. M., Silva E. J., Allan J. S., Emens J. S. Stability, precision, and near-24-hour period of the human circadian pacemaker. Science. 1999 Jun 25;284(5423):2177–2181. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5423.2177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Czeisler C. A., Moore-Ede M. C., Coleman R. H. Rotating shift work schedules that disrupt sleep are improved by applying circadian principles. Science. 1982 Jul 30;217(4558):460–463. doi: 10.1126/science.7089576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EYSENCK S. B., EYSENCK H. J. AN IMPROVED SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF EXTRAVERSION AND NEUROTICISM. Life Sci. 1964 Oct;3:1103–1109. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(64)90125-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folkard S., Monk T. H., Lobban M. C. Towards a predictive test of adjustment to shift work. Ergonomics. 1979 Jan;22(1):79–91. doi: 10.1080/00140137908924591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folkard S., Spelten E., Totterdell P., Barton J., Smith L. The use of survey measures to assess circadian variations in alertness. Sleep. 1995 Jun;18(5):355–361. doi: 10.1093/sleep/18.5.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald I, I, Smith L, Lowe SL, Folkard S. Effects on Accidents of Time into Shift and of Short Breaks between Shifts. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1997 Jul;3(Suppl 2):S40–S45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turek F. W. Circadian principles and design of rotating shift work schedules. Am J Physiol. 1986 Sep;251(3 Pt 2):R636–R638. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1986.251.3.R636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]