Abstract
OBJECTIVES—To compare the performance of population specific job exposure matrices (JEMs) and self reported occupational exposure with data on exposure and lung function from three European general populations. METHODS—Self reported occupational exposure (yes or no) and present occupation were recorded in the three general population surveys conducted in France, The Netherlands, and Norway. Analysis was performed on subjects, aged 25-64, who provided good forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) tracings and whose occupations were performed by at least two people, in the French (6217 men and 5571 women), the Dutch (men from urban (854) and rural (780) areas), and the Norwegian (395 men) surveys. Two population specific JEMs, based on the percentage of subjects who reported themselves exposed in each job, were constructed for each survey and each sex. The first matrix classified jobs into three categories of exposure according to the proportion of subjects who reported themselves exposed in each job (P10-50 JEM, low < 10%, moderate 10-49%, high ⩾ 50%). For the second matrix, a dichotomous variable was constructed to have the same statistical power as the self reported exposure—that is, the exposure prevalence (p) was the same with both exposure assessment methods (Pp JEM). Relations between occupational exposure, as estimated by the two JEMs and self reported exposure, and age, height, city, and smoking adjusted FEV1 score were compared. RESULTS—Significant associations between occupational exposure estimated by the population specific JEM and lung function were found in the French and the rural Dutch surveys, whereas no significant relation was found with self reported exposure. In populations with few subjects in most jobs, exposure cannot be estimated with sufficient precision by a population specific JEM, which may explain the lack of relation in the Norwegian and the Dutch (urban area) surveys. CONCLUSION—The population specific JEM, which was easy to construct and cost little, seemed to perform better than crude self reported exposures, in populations with sufficient numbers of subjects per job. Keywords: job exposure matrix; occupational exposure; lung function
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (145.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bakke P. S., Baste V., Hanoa R., Gulsvik A. Prevalence of obstructive lung disease in a general population: relation to occupational title and exposure to some airborne agents. Thorax. 1991 Dec;46(12):863–870. doi: 10.1136/thx.46.12.863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becklake M. R. Occupational exposures: evidence for a causal association with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989 Sep;140(3 Pt 2):S85–S91. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.3_Pt_2.S85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouyer J., Hémon D. Comparison of three methods of estimating odds ratios from a job exposure matrix in occupational case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Feb 15;137(4):472–481. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouyer J., Hémon D. Studying the performance of a job exposure matrix. Int J Epidemiol. 1993;22 (Suppl 2):S65–S71. doi: 10.1093/ije/22.supplement_2.s65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fermanian J. Mesure de l'accord entre deux juges. Cas qualitatif. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1984;32(2):140–147. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kauppinen T. P., Mutanen P. O., Seitsamo J. T. Magnitude of misclassification bias when using a job-exposure matrix. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992 Apr;18(2):105–112. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kromhout H., Heederik D., Dalderup L. M., Kromhout D. Performance of two general job-exposure matrices in a study of lung cancer morbidity in the Zutphen cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Sep 15;136(6):698–711. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krzyzanowski M., Kauffmann F. The relation of respiratory symptoms and ventilatory function to moderate occupational exposure in a general population. Results from the French PAARC study of 16,000 adults. Int J Epidemiol. 1988 Jun;17(2):397–406. doi: 10.1093/ije/17.2.397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Le Moual N., Orlowski E., Schenker M. B., Avignon M., Brochard P., Kauffmann F. Occupational exposures estimated by means of job exposure matrices in relation to lung function in the PAARC survey. Occup Environ Med. 1995 Oct;52(10):634–643. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.10.634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pannett B., Coggon D., Acheson E. D. A job-exposure matrix for use in population based studies in England and Wales. Br J Ind Med. 1985 Nov;42(11):777–783. doi: 10.1136/oem.42.11.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Post W. K., Heederik D., Kromhout H., Kromhout D. Occupational exposures estimated by a population specific job exposure matrix and 25 year incidence rate of chronic nonspecific lung disease (CNSLD): the Zutphen Study. Eur Respir J. 1994 Jun;7(6):1048–1055. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Siemiatycki J., Dewar R., Richardson L. Costs and statistical power associated with five methods of collecting occupation exposure information for population-based case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;130(6):1236–1246. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sunyer J., Kogevinas M., Kromhout H., Antó J. M., Roca J., Tobias A., Vermeulen R., Payo F., Maldonado J. A., Martinez-Moratalla J. Pulmonary ventilatory defects and occupational exposures in a population-based study in Spain. Spanish Group of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;157(2):512–517. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.2.9705029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tielemans E., Kupper L. L., Kromhout H., Heederik D., Houba R. Individual-based and group-based occupational exposure assessment: some equations to evaluate different strategies. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998 Feb;42(2):115–119. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4878(97)00051-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
