Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Jan;58(1):46–51. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.1.46

Audiometric notch as a sign of noise induced hearing loss

D McBride 1, S Williams 1
PMCID: PMC1740031  PMID: 11119634

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To investigate the relation between different types of exposure to noise and a classic sign of noise induced hearing loss (NIHL), the audiometric notch.
METHODS—The study sample had exposure to both continuous and impulse noise and was drawn from a population of electrical transmission workers. Audiograms, taken as part of a hearing conservation programme, were read by three clinicians experienced in the assessment of NIHL. Working independently and using their clinical judgment, they were asked to identify localised increases in the threshold of hearing (audiometric notches) which they would attribute to noise, had a suitable history of exposure been elicited. Prevalent cases of NIHL were identified by the presence of a notch in either ear. Risk factors for NIHL were assessed by a questionnaire which sought information about exposure to air blast circuit breaker noise; firearms; explosions, and continuous noise. The odds of exposure to these factors in those with and without hearing loss were calculated, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated by logistic regression.
RESULTS—Of the 648 questionnaires sent out 357 were returned, a response rate of 55%. Of these, at least two out of the three assessors identified 175 (49%) people with a notch at any audiometric frequency. There was no association between these cases and the NIHL risk factors identified by the questionnaire, but a further frequency specific analysis showed a small proportion of people (15 (4%)) with notches at 4 kHz who had the expected associations with exposure to noise and a significant OR for firearms of 4.25 (95% CI 1.28 to 14.1). The much larger proportion of people with 6 kHz notches (110 (31%)) did not show these associations.
CONCLUSIONS—To diagnose NIHL it is important to elicit a detailed and accurate history of exposure to noise: although the notch at 4 kHz is a well established clinical sign and may be valuable in confirming the diagnosis, the 6 kHz notch is variable and of limited importance.


Keywords: hearing loss; noise induced; noise; occupational

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ATHERLEY G. R., DINGWALL-FORDYCE I. THE RELIABILITY OF REPEATED AUDITORY THRESHOLD DETERMINATION. Br J Ind Med. 1963 Jul;20:231–235. doi: 10.1136/oem.20.3.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelsson A. Diagnosis and treatment of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1979;360:86–87. doi: 10.3109/00016487809123481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Axelsson A., Jerson T., Lindberg U., Lindgren F. Early noise-induced hearing loss in teenage boys. Scand Audiol. 1981;10(2):91–96. doi: 10.3109/01050398109076167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown J. R. Noise-induced hearing loss sustained during land operations in the Falkland Islands Campaign, 1982. J Soc Occup Med. 1985 May;35(2):44–54. doi: 10.1093/occmed/35.2.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Coles R. R., Garinther G. R., Hodge D. C., Rice C. G. Hazardous exposure to impulse noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968 Feb;43(2):336–343. doi: 10.1121/1.1910785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GRAVENDEEL D. W., PLOMP R. The relation between permanent and temporary noise dips. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1959 Jun;69(6):714–719. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1959.00730030728009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lees R. E., Roberts J. H., Wald Z. Noise induced hearing loss and leisure activities of young people: a pilot study. Can J Public Health. 1985 May-Jun;76(3):171–173. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lutman M. E., Spencer H. S. Occupational noise and demographic factors in hearing. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1990;476:74–84. doi: 10.3109/00016489109127258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McBride D. I., Williams S. Air blast circuit breaker noise and hearing loss: a multifactorial model for risk assessment. Occup Med (Lond) 2000 Apr;50(3):173–181. doi: 10.1093/occmed/50.3.173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mäntysalo S., Vuori J. Effects of impulse noise and continuous steady state noise on hearing. Br J Ind Med. 1984 Feb;41(1):122–132. doi: 10.1136/oem.41.1.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Robinson D. W. Threshold of hearing as a function of age and sex for the typical unscreened population. Br J Audiol. 1988 Feb;22(1):5–20. doi: 10.3109/03005368809077793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Salmivalli A. Military audiological aspects in noise-induced hearing losses. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1979;360:96–97. doi: 10.3109/00016487809123484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sulkowski W. J. Hearing impairment caused by impulse noise: survey in the drop forging industry. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1980 Aug;(Suppl 12):307–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. TAYLOR W., PEARSON J., MAIR A., BURNS W. STUDY OF NOISE AND HEARING IN JUTE WEAVING. J Acoust Soc Am. 1965 Jul;38:113–120. doi: 10.1121/1.1909580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES