Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Oct;58(10):641–648. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.10.641

Dioxin and diabetes mellitus: an analysis of the combined NIOSH and Ranch Hand data

K Steenland 1, G Calvert 1, N Ketchum 1, J Michalek 1
PMCID: PMC1740043  PMID: 11555685

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To reanalyze in a similar manner the two principal studies of TCDD (tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin) and diabetes in an attempt to reconcile disparate results.
METHODS—Data from 990 United States Air Force veterans (Ranch Hand) and 1275 referents were reanalyzed, and a NIOSH population of 267 chemical workers and 227 referents. The Ranch Hand veterans had lower concentrations of lipid adjusted serum TCDD (median 12 parts per trillion (ppt)) than the NIOSH workers (median 75 ppt) when examined in the late 1980s. An analysis was conducted of the combined data sets, adopting a uniform approach to outcome definition, data analysis, and covariate control.
RESULTS—The combined exposed groups did not differ markedly from the combined non-exposed groups for prevalence of diabetes (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.92 to 1.48), with no evidence of heterogeneity of exposure effect between studies. Also virtually no difference was found between combined exposed and non-exposed groups in mean fasting serum glucose (difference in log serum glucose 0.002, 95% CI −0.006 to 0.010), and there was little evidence in either study of a dose-response trend for fasting serum glucose. An increasing trend was found (p=0.0001) in prevalence of diabetes with increased TCDD (at the time of examination or at time of last exposure) among the Ranch Hand population, with excess risk largely confined to the highest 8% of the exposed group (>78 ppt serum TCDD), which had an OR of 3.21 (95% CI 1.81 to 5.72) versus those with <10 ppt TCDD. However, no such positive dose-response was found in the NIOSH population.
CONCLUSIONS—There was little overall evidence that the exposed workers were at higher risk than the non-exposed workers of diabetes or abnormal fasting glucose. However, the Ranch Hand subjects showed a positive dose-response for diabetes, whereas the more highly exposed NIOSH subjects did not. The reason for the difference in diabetes dose-response trends between the two studies is unknown.


Keywords: dioxin; diabetes; TCDD

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Calvert G. M., Sweeney M. H., Deddens J., Wall D. K. Evaluation of diabetes mellitus, serum glucose, and thyroid function among United States workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Apr;56(4):270–276. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.4.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cranmer M., Louie S., Kennedy R. H., Kern P. A., Fonseca V. A. Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. Toxicol Sci. 2000 Aug;56(2):431–436. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/56.2.431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Enan E., Matsumura F. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-induced changes in glucose transporting activity in guinea pigs, mice, and rats in vivo and in vitro. J Biochem Toxicol. 1994 Apr;9(2):97–106. doi: 10.1002/jbt.2570090207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Henriksen G. L., Ketchum N. S., Michalek J. E., Swaby J. A. Serum dioxin and diabetes mellitus in veterans of Operation Ranch Hand. Epidemiology. 1997 May;8(3):252–258. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199705000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lai M. S., Hsueh Y. M., Chen C. J., Shyu M. P., Chen S. Y., Kuo T. L., Wu M. M., Tai T. Y. Ingested inorganic arsenic and prevalence of diabetes mellitus. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Mar 1;139(5):484–492. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ott M. G., Zober A., Germann C. Laboratory results for selected target organs in 138 individuals occupationally exposed to TCDD. Chemosphere. 1994 Nov-Dec;29(9-11):2423–2437. doi: 10.1016/0045-6535(94)90411-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Patterson D. G., Jr, Hampton L., Lapeza C. R., Jr, Belser W. T., Green V., Alexander L., Needham L. L. High-resolution gas chromatographic/high-resolution mass spectrometric analysis of human serum on a whole-weight and lipid basis for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Anal Chem. 1987 Aug 1;59(15):2000–2005. doi: 10.1021/ac00142a023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pesatori A. C., Zocchetti C., Guercilena S., Consonni D., Turrini D., Bertazzi P. A. Dioxin exposure and non-malignant health effects: a mortality study. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Feb;55(2):126–131. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.2.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rahman M., Tondel M., Ahmad S. A., Axelson O. Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Jul 15;148(2):198–203. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Soter N. A., Wasserman S. I., Austen K. F. Cold urticaria: release into the circulation of histamine and eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis during cold challenge. N Engl J Med. 1976 Mar 25;294(13):687–690. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197603252941302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Steenland K., Piacitelli L., Deddens J., Fingerhut M., Chang L. I. Cancer, heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 May 5;91(9):779–786. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.9.779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tseng C. H., Tai T. Y., Chong C. K., Tseng C. P., Lai M. S., Lin B. J., Chiou H. Y., Hsueh Y. M., Hsu K. H., Chen C. J. Long-term arsenic exposure and incidence of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a cohort study in arseniasis-hyperendemic villages in Taiwan. Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Sep;108(9):847–851. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vena J., Boffetta P., Becher H., Benn T., Bueno-de-Mesquita H. B., Coggon D., Colin D., Flesch-Janys D., Green L., Kauppinen T. Exposure to dioxin and nonneoplastic mortality in the expanded IARC international cohort study of phenoxy herbicide and chlorophenol production workers and sprayers. Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Apr;106 (Suppl 2):645–653. doi: 10.1289/ehp.98106645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zober A., Ott M. G., Messerer P. Morbidity follow up study of BASF employees exposed to 2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) after a 1953 chemical reactor incident. Occup Environ Med. 1994 Jul;51(7):479–486. doi: 10.1136/oem.51.7.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES