Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Feb;58(2):119–123. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.2.119

Sensitisation to enzymes in the animal feed industry

M Vanhanen 1, T Tuomi 1, U Tiikkainen 1, O Tupasela 1, A Tuomainen 1, R Luukkonen 1, H Nordman 1
PMCID: PMC1740093  PMID: 11160990

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To assess the prevalence of enzyme sensitisation in the animal feed industry.
METHODS—A cross sectional study was conducted in four animal feed factories, where several enzymes had been used in powder form for 7-9 years. Before this study, enzymes in liquid form had started to be used. Sensitisation to enzymes was examined by skin prick and radioallergosorbent (RAST) tests. Altogether 218 workers were tested; 140 people in various tasks in manufacturing, where exposure to various organic dusts and to enzymes was possible, and 78 non-exposed office workers. The workers were interviewed for work related respiratory and skin symptoms. Total dust concentrations were measured by a gravimetric method. The concentrations of protease and α-amylase were measured with catalytic methods and that of xylanase with an immunological method.
RESULTS—Ten workers (7%) were sensitised to enzymes in the exposed group of 140, whereas none were sensitised in the non-exposed group. Six of the sensitised people had respiratory symptoms at work: two of them especially in connection with exposure to enzymes. Enzyme concentrations in the air varied greatly: xylanase from less than 0.8 ng/m3 up to 16 ng/m3, α-amylase from less than 20 ng/m3 up to 200 ng/m3, and protease from less than 0.4 ng/m3up to 2900 ng/m3. On average, highest xylanase and α-amylase concentrations were found in the various manufacturing sites, whereas the highest protease concentrations were found in areas of high total dust.
CONCLUSIONS—Industrial enzymes may cause allergies in the animal feed industry. There is a need to assess exposure to enzymes at various phases of production, and to minimise exposures.


Keywords: animal feed; enzyme allergy; occupational exposure

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (152.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baur X., Fruhmann G., Haug B., Rasche B., Reiher W., Weiss W. Role of Aspergillus amylase in baker's asthma. Lancet. 1986 Jan 4;1(8471):43–43. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)91924-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ceska M., Eriksson R., Varga J. M. Radioimmunosorbent assay of allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1972 Jan;49(1):1–9. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(72)90117-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Doekes G., Kamminga N., Helwegen L., Heederik D. Occupational IgE sensitisation to phytase, a phosphatase derived from Aspergillus niger. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jul;56(7):454–459. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.7.454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Flindt M. L. Pulmonary disease due to inhalation of derivatives of Bacillus subtilis containing proteolytic enzyme. Lancet. 1969 Jun 14;1(7607):1177–1181. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(69)92165-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Houba R., Heederik D. J., Doekes G., van Run P. E. Exposure-sensitization relationship for alpha-amylase allergens in the baking industry. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996 Jul;154(1):130–136. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.154.1.8680668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Johnsen C. R., Sorensen T. B., Ingemann Larsen A., Bertelsen Secher A., Andreasen E., Kofoed G. S., Fredslund Nielsen L., Gyntelberg F. Allergy risk in an enzyme producing plant: a retrospective follow up study. Occup Environ Med. 1997 Sep;54(9):671–675. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.9.671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nieuwenhuijsen M. J., Heederik D., Doekes G., Venables K. M., Newman Taylor A. J. Exposure-response relations of alpha-amylase sensitisation in British bakeries and flour mills. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Mar;56(3):197–201. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.3.197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sander I., Raulf-Heimsoth M., Düser M., Flagge A., Czuppon A. B., Baur X. Differentiation between cosensitization and cross-reactivity in wheat flour and grass pollen-sensitized subjects. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 1997 Apr;112(4):378–385. doi: 10.1159/000237483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tee R. D. Allergy to storage mites. Clin Exp Allergy. 1994 Jul;24(7):636–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb00967.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vanhanen M., Tuomi T., Hokkanen H., Tupasela O., Tuomainen A., Holmberg P. C., Leisola M., Nordman H. Enzyme exposure and enzyme sensitisation in the baking industry. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Oct;53(10):670–676. doi: 10.1136/oem.53.10.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Vanhanen M., Tuomi T., Nordman H., Tupasela O., Holmberg P. C., Miettinen M., Mutanen P., Leisola M. Sensitization to industrial enzymes in enzyme research and production. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Oct;23(5):385–391. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Vanhanen M., Tuomi T., Tiikkainen U., Tupasela O., Voutilainen R., Nordman H. Risk of enzyme allergy in the detergent industry. Occup Environ Med. 2000 Feb;57(2):121–125. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.2.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van der Heide S., Niemeijer N. R., Hovenga H., de Monchy J. G., Dubois A. E., Kauffman H. F. Prevalence of sensitization to the storage mites Acarus siro, Tyrophagus putrescentiae, and Lepidoglyphus destructor in allergic patients with different degrees of sensitization to the house-dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Allergy. 1998 Apr;53(4):426–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03917.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES