Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Mar;58(3):194–199. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.3.194

Effects of drop out in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal disorders

C Bildt 1, L Alfredsson 1, L Punnett 1, H Theobald 1, M Torgen 1, A Wikman 1
PMCID: PMC1740112  PMID: 11171933

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—The drop out rates in different longitudinal studies of musculoskeletal disorders range between 7% and 57%, and little is known about the characteristics of the subjects who dropped out. The aim was to analyse various consequences of drop out in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational risk factors during 1969-97.
METHOD—Data about occupational conditions and health in 1969 and in 1993 were analysed. Differences between those who participated throughout (participants) and drop out subjects in these analyses formed the basis for recalculations of earlier reported analyses of associations between occupational conditions and low back pain. In the recalculation the data were weighted to compensate for the differences.
RESULTS—More female and male drop out subjects than participants in 1993 had monotonous work, fewer women and more male drop out subjects had heavy lifting in 1969. In 1997, more female and male drop out subjects had had heavy lifting and low stimulation at work in 1993. At both occasions, there were differences between the drop out subjects and participants in occurrence of musculoskeletal disorders. The weighted analyses resulted in changes in risk ratio of 0.1-0.2.
CONCLUSIONS—Differences in occupational conditions and health among participants and drop out subjects in a longitudinal study of musculoskeletal disorders and occupational risk factors during 1969-97 did not markedly influence the risk ratios.


Keywords: panel study; non-response; survey method; methodological study

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (116.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bergenudd H., Nilsson B. Back pain in middle age; occupational workload and psychologic factors: an epidemiologic survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1988 Jan;13(1):58–60. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198801000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bigos S. J., Battié M. C., Spengler D. M., Fisher L. D., Fordyce W. E., Hansson T. H., Nachemson A. L., Wortley M. D. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991 Jan;16(1):1–6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199101000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boshuizen H. C., Hulshof C. T., Bongers P. M. Long-term sick leave and disability pensioning due to back disorders of tractor drivers exposed to whole-body vibration. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990;62(2):117–122. doi: 10.1007/BF00383587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bygren L. O. Met and unmet needs for medical and social services. Scand J Soc Med Suppl. 1974;8:1–134. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cottler L. B., Compton W. M., Ben-Abdallah A., Horne M., Claverie D. Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Jul;41(3):209–217. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(96)01254-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Criqui M. H. Response bias and risk ratios in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1979 Apr;109(4):394–399. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kurppa K., Viikari-Juntura E., Kuosma E., Huuskonen M., Kivi P. Incidence of tenosynovitis or peritendinitis and epicondylitis in a meat-processing factory. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Feb;17(1):32–37. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pietri-Taleb F., Riihimäki H., Viikari-Juntura E., Lindström K., Moneta G. B. The role of psychological distress and personality in the incidence of sciatic pain among working men. Am J Public Health. 1995 Apr;85(4):541–545. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.4.541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Riihimäki H., Viikari-Juntura E., Moneta G., Kuha J., Videman T., Tola S. Incidence of sciatic pain among men in machine operating, dynamic physical work, and sedentary work. A three-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1994 Jan 15;19(2):138–142. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Schibye B., Skov T., Ekner D., Christiansen J. U., Sjøgaard G. Musculoskeletal symptoms among sewing machine operators. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Dec;21(6):427–434. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Siddiqui O., Flay B. R., Hu F. B. Factors affecting attrition in a longitudinal smoking prevention study. Prev Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;25(5):554–560. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Theobald H., Bygren L. O., Carstensen J., Hauffman M., Engfeldt P. Effects of an assessment of needs for medical and social services on long-term mortality: a randomized controlled study. Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;27(2):194–198. doi: 10.1093/ije/27.2.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thorbjörnsson C. O., Alfredsson L., Fredriksson K., Köster M., Michélsen H., Vingård E., Torgén M., Kilbom A. Psychosocial and physical risk factors associated with low back pain: a 24 year follow up among women and men in a broad range of occupations. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Feb;55(2):84–90. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.2.84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Viikari-Juntura E., Riihimäki H., Tola S., Videman T., Mutanen P. Neck trouble in machine operating, dynamic physical work and sedentary work: a prospective study on occupational and individual risk factors. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;47(12):1411–1422. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(94)90085-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Viikari-Juntura E., Vuori J., Silverstein B. A., Kalimo R., Kuosma E., Videman T. A life-long prospective study on the role of psychosocial factors in neck-shoulder and low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1991 Sep;16(9):1056–1061. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199109000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES