Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Apr;58(4):272–278. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.4.272

Consumer satisfaction with occupational health services: should it be measured?

J Verbeek 1, F van Dijk 1, K Rasanen 1, H Piirainen 1, E Kankaanpaa 1, C Hulshof 1
PMCID: PMC1740125  PMID: 11245745

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To find answers in the literature to the questions if, why, and how consumer satisfaction with occupational health services (OHSs) should be measured.
METHODS—Publications about the concept of consumer satisfaction with health care and surveys of consumer satisfaction with occupational health care were reviewed.
RESULTS—For care providers, surveys of consumer satisfaction can be useful to improve quality or as indicators of non-compliant behaviour among patients. For clients, satisfaction surveys can be helpful for choosing between healthcare providers. Satisfaction is made up of an affective component of evaluation and a cognitive component of expectations. Also, in occupational health care, patient satisfaction is measured by dimensions such as the humanness and competence of the care provider similar to health care in general. However, there are dimensions that are specific to occupational health—such as the perceived independence of the physician, unclear reasons for visiting an OHS, and the perceived extent of knowledge of OHS professionals about the patient's working conditions. Dimensions of client satisfaction are mostly similar to patient satisfaction but include more businesslike aspects. They are different for the two groups of client, employers and employees. To measure consumer satisfaction in occupational healthcare specific questionnaires must be constructed. To achieve the highest possible reader satisfaction guidelines are provided for construction of a questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS—Consumer satisfaction is a complex theoretical concept, but it is relatively easy to measure in practice and can be a valuable tool for quality improvement. Consumers' evaluations of occupational health services will become increasingly important due to changes in the organisation of occupational health care. Occupational healthcare providers are encouraged to measure the consumer satisfaction of their services.


Keywords: consumer satisfaction; occupational health services

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bernhart M. H., Wiadnyana I. G., Wihardjo H., Pohan I. Patient satisfaction in developing countries. Soc Sci Med. 1999 Apr;48(8):989–996. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00376-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berwick D. M. The total customer relationship in health care: broadening the bandwidth. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1997 May;23(5):245–250. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30314-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carlier I. V., Voerman A. E., Gersons B. P. The influence of occupational debriefing on post-traumatic stress symptomatology in traumatized police officers. Br J Med Psychol. 2000 Mar;73(Pt 1):87–98. doi: 10.1348/000711200160327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cleary P. D. The increasing importance of patient surveys. Now that sound methods exist, patient surveys can facilitate improvement. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):720–721. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Conbere P. C., McGovern P., Kochevar L., Widtfeldt A. Measuring satisfaction with medical case management. A quality improvement tool. AAOHN J. 1992 Jul;40(7):333–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coulter A. Paternalism or partnership? Patients have grown up-and there's no going back. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):719–720. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitzpatrick R., Boulton M. Qualitative methods for assessing health care. Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;3(2):107–113. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patient satisfaction: II--Designing a questionnaire and conducting a survey. BMJ. 1991 May 11;302(6785):1129–1132. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6785.1129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fitzpatrick R. Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations. BMJ. 1991 Apr 13;302(6781):887–889. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6781.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hall J. A., Dornan M. C. What patients like about their medical care and how often they are asked: a meta-analysis of the satisfaction literature. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(9):935–939. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Howie J. G., Heaney D. J., Maxwell M., Walker J. J., Freeman G. K., Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):738–743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hulshof C. T., Verbeek J. H., van Dijk F. J., van der Weide W. E., Braam I. T. Evaluation research in occupational health services: general principles and a systematic review of empirical studies. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jun;56(6):361–377. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.6.361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahan E., Peretz C., Rybski M., Shain R. Determination of consumer satisfaction: a basic step for quality improvement of an occupational hygiene service. Occup Med (Lond) 1995 Aug;45(4):193–198. doi: 10.1093/occmed/45.4.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kujala V., Väisänen S. Evaluation of occupational health service in the wood processing industry--determination of employee satisfaction. Occup Med (Lond) 1997 Feb;47(2):95–100. doi: 10.1093/occmed/47.2.95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lewis J. R. Patient views on quality care in general practice: literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Sep;39(5):655–670. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Linder-Pelz S. U. Toward a theory of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(5):577–582. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90311-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mitchell R., Leanna J. C., Hyde R. Client satisfaction with nursing services. Evaluation in an occupational health setting. AAOHN J. 1999 Feb;47(2):74–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Plomp H. N. Evaluation of doctor-worker encounters in occupational health: an explanatory study. Occup Med (Lond) 1999 Apr;49(3):183–188. doi: 10.1093/occmed/49.3.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Robinson S., Brodie M. Understanding the quality challenge for health consumers: the Kaiser/AHCPR Survey. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1997 May;23(5):239–244. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30313-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rogers B., Winslow B., Higgins S. Employee satisfaction with occupational health services: results of a survey. AAOHN J. 1993 Feb;41(2):58–65. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sitzia J., Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997 Dec;45(12):1829–1843. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sitzia J., Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Aug;10(4):311–317. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.4.311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thompson A. G. Competition and quality: looking for evidence for health care reforms. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Oct;10(5):371–373. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.5.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Thompson A. G., Suñol R. Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Qual Health Care. 1995 Jun;7(2):127–141. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/7.2.127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Torstensen T. A., Ljunggren A. E., Meen H. D., Odland E., Mowinckel P., Geijerstam S. Efficiency and costs of medical exercise therapy, conventional physiotherapy, and self-exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. A pragmatic, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998 Dec 1;23(23):2616–2624. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199812010-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Veroff D. R., Gallagher P. M., Wilson V., Uyeda M., Merselis J., Guadagnoli E., Edgman-Levitan S., Zaslavsky A., Kleimann S., Cleary P. D. Effective reports for health care quality data: lessons from a CAHPS demonstration in Washington State. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;10(6):555–560. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/10.6.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Vuori H. Patient satisfaction--does it matter? Qual Assur Health Care. 1991;3(3):183–189. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/3.3.183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Weel A. N., Slotboom M. A. Quality improvement by means of "differential' occupational health care: an experiment in a regional occupational health centre. Occup Med (Lond) 1996 Feb;46(1):20–24. doi: 10.1093/occmed/46.1.20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wensing M., Grol R., Smits A. Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(1):45–53. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90298-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Williams B., Coyle J., Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(9):1351–1359. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00213-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Williams B. Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? Soc Sci Med. 1994 Feb;38(4):509–516. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90247-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. van der Weide W. E., Verbeek J. H., van Dijk F. J. Relation between indicators for quality of occupational rehabilitation of employees with low back pain. Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jul;56(7):488–493. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.7.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES