Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Jun;58(6):392–398. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.6.392

Association between occupation and contact allergy to the fragrance mix: a multifactorial analysis of national surveillance data

W Uter 1, A Schnuch 1, J Geier 1, A Pfahlberg 1, O Gefeller 1
PMCID: PMC1740144  PMID: 11351055

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To assess the role of potential (occupational) risk factors for fragrance contact allergy (FCA). Most studies assessing the range of contact sensitisation in various clinical populations found the fragrance mix, a good screening tool for the detection of FCA in general, to be one of the leading allergens. The role of occupational exposure to fragrances is, however, yet unclear.
METHODS—Firstly, crude analyses of the prevalence of FCA in various occupational fields including all 57 779 patients patch tested in the participating centres of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between January 1992 and December 1998. Secondly, a multifactorial Poisson regression analysis of these patients, including several potential risk factors.
RESULTS—(a) The proportion of patients with FCA varied greatly between different occupational groups from 2.5% to 17.4%, (b) the highest occupational risk of FCA was associated with work as a masseur or physiotherapist, metal furnace operator, potter or glass maker etc, or geriatric nurse, (c) non-occupational factors that influenced risk of FCA included atopy, female sex, several sites, in particular the axillae, and increasing age.
CONCLUSIONS—Occupations with a high risk of FCA were identified as targets of preventive action—that is, the substitution of scented products with fragrance free materials with which to work (skin disinfectants, cleaning solutions, personal care products) wherever possible.


Keywords: contact allergy; occupational risk factors; fragrances

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (156.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Christophersen J., Menné T., Tanghøj P., Andersen K. E., Brandrup F., Kaaber K., Osmundsen P. E., Thestrup-Pedersen K., Veien N. K. Clinical patch test data evaluated by multivariate analysis. Danish Contact Dermatitis Group. Contact Dermatitis. 1989 Nov;21(5):291–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1989.tb04746.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Goodfield M. J., Saihan E. M. Fragrance sensitivity in coal miners. Contact Dermatitis. 1988 Feb;18(2):81–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02744.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johansen J. D., Rastogi S. C., Andersen K. E., Menné T. Content and reactivity to product perfumes in fragrance mix positive and negative eczema patients. A study of perfumes used in toiletries and skin-care products. Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Jun;36(6):291–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Larsen W. G. Perfume dermatitis. a study of 20 patients. Arch Dermatol. 1977 May;113(5):623–626. doi: 10.1001/archderm.113.5.623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Larsen W., Nakayama H., Lindberg M., Fischer T., Elsner P., Burrows D., Jordan W., Shaw S., Wilkinson J., Marks J., Jr Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I). Am J Contact Dermat. 1996 Jun;7(2):77–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nielsen N. H., Menné T. Allergic contact sensitization in an unselected Danish population. The Glostrup Allergy Study, Denmark. Acta Derm Venereol. 1992 Nov;72(6):456–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scheinman P. L. The foul side of fragrance-free products: what every clinician should know about managing patients with fragrance allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999 Dec;41(6):1020–1024. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70265-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Schnuch A., Geier J., Uter W., Frosch P. J., Lehmacher W., Aberer W., Agathos M., Arnold R., Fuchs T., Laubstein B. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population-adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40,000 patients from a multicenter study (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Nov;37(5):200–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb02435.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schnuch A. PAFS: population-adjusted frequency of sensitization. (I) Influence of sex and age. Contact Dermatitis. 1996 Jun;34(6):377–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02236.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Soter N. A., Wasserman S. I., Austen K. F. Cold urticaria: release into the circulation of histamine and eosinophil chemotactic factor of anaphylaxis during cold challenge. N Engl J Med. 1976 Mar 25;294(13):687–690. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197603252941302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Uter W., Geier J., Schnuch A. The MOAHLFA index in 17 centers of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) over 6 years. Contact Dermatitis. 1999 Dec;41(6):343–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06186.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Uter W., Schnuch A., Geier J., Frosch P. J. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol. 1998 Jan-Feb;8(1):36–40. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wessbecher R., Straube M., Szliska C., Schwanitz H. J. Anamneseauxilium und gewerbedermatologische Beurteilung bei medizinischen Bademeistern, Masseuren und Physiotherapeuten. Hautarzt. 1998 Dec;49(12):912–919. doi: 10.1007/s001050050847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. de Groot A. C., Frosch P. J. Adverse reactions to fragrances. A clinical review. Contact Dermatitis. 1997 Feb;36(2):57–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1997.tb00418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES