Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2001 Jul;58(7):447–452. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.7.447

Use of routinely collected data on trihalomethane in drinking water for epidemiological purposes

T Keegan 1, H Whitaker 1, M Nieuwenhuijsen 1, M Toledano 1, P Elliott 1, J Fawell 1, M Wilkinson 1, N Best 1
PMCID: PMC1740158  PMID: 11404449

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To explore the use of routinely collected trihalomethane (THM) measurements for epidemiological studies. Recently there has been interest in the relation between byproducts of disinfection of public drinking water and certain adverse reproductive outcomes, including stillbirth, congenital malformations, and low birth weight.
METHOD—Five years of THM readings (1992-6), collected for compliance with statutory limits, were analysed. One water company in the north west of England, divided into 288 water zones, provided 15 984 observations for statistical analysis. On average each zone was sampled 11.1 times a year. Five year, annual, monthly, and seasonal variation in THMs were examined as well as the variability within and between zones.
RESULTS—Between 1992 and 1996 the total THM (TTHM) annual zone means were less than half the statutory concentration, at approximately 46 µg/l. Differences in annual water zone means were within 7%. Over the study period, the maximum water zone mean fell from 142.2 to 88.1 µg/l. Mean annual concentrations for individual THMs (µg/l) were 36.6, 8.0, and 2.8 for chloroform, bromodichloromethane (BDCM), and dibromochloromethane (DBCM) respectively. Bromoform data were not analysed, because a high proportion of the data were below the detection limit. The correlation between chloroform and TTHM was 0.98, between BDCM and TTHM 0.62, and between DBCM and TTHM −0.09. Between zone variation was larger than within zone variation for chloroform and BDCM, but not for DBCM. There was only little seasonal variation (<3%). Monthly variation was found although there were no consistent trends within years.
CONCLUSION—In an area where the TTHM concentrations were less than half the statutory limit (48 µg/l) chloroform formed a high proportion of TTHM. The results of the correlation analysis suggest that TTHM concentrations provided a good indication of chloroform concentrations, a reasonable indication of BDCM concentrations, but no indication of DBCM. Zone means were similar over the years, but the maximum concentrations reduced considerably, which suggests that successful improvements in treatment have been made to reduce high TTHM concentrations in the area. For chloroform and BDCM, the main THMs, the component between water zones was greater than variation within water zones and explained most of the overall exposure variation. Variation between months and seasons was low and showed no clear trends within years. The results indicate that routinely collected data can be used to obtain exposure estimates for epidemiological studies at a small area level.


Keywords: chlorination byproducts; exposure; birth outcomes; routine data; trihalomethanes

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aschengrau A., Zierler S., Cohen A. Quality of community drinking water and the occurrence of late adverse pregnancy outcomes. Arch Environ Health. 1993 Mar-Apr;48(2):105–113. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1993.9938403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bove F. J., Fulcomer M. C., Klotz J. B., Esmart J., Dufficy E. M., Savrin J. E. Public drinking water contamination and birth outcomes. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 May 1;141(9):850–862. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dodds L., King W., Woolcott C., Pole J. Trihalomethanes in public water supplies and adverse birth outcomes. Epidemiology. 1999 May;10(3):233–237. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gallagher M. D., Nuckols J. R., Stallones L., Savitz D. A. Exposure to trihalomethanes and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology. 1998 Sep;9(5):484–489. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kanitz S., Franco Y., Patrone V., Caltabellotta M., Raffo E., Riggi C., Timitilli D., Ravera G. Association between drinking water disinfection and somatic parameters at birth. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 May;104(5):516–520. doi: 10.1289/ehp.96104516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klotz J. B., Pyrch L. A. Neural tube defects and drinking water disinfection by-products. Epidemiology. 1999 Jul;10(4):383–390. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199907000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kramer M. D., Lynch C. F., Isacson P., Hanson J. W. The association of waterborne chloroform with intrauterine growth retardation. Epidemiology. 1992 Sep;3(5):407–413. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199209000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Morris R. D., Audet A. M., Angelillo I. F., Chalmers T. C., Mosteller F. Chlorination, chlorination by-products, and cancer: a meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 1992 Jul;82(7):955–963. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.7.955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nieuwenhuijsen M. J., Toledano M. B., Eaton N. E., Fawell J., Elliott P. Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review. Occup Environ Med. 2000 Feb;57(2):73–85. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.2.73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nieuwenhuijsen M. J., Toledano M. B., Elliott P. Uptake of chlorination disinfection by-products; a review and a discussion of its implications for exposure assessment in epidemiological studies. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;10(6 Pt 1):586–599. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Reif J. S., Hatch M. C., Bracken M., Holmes L. B., Schwetz B. A., Singer P. C. Reproductive and developmental effects of disinfection by-products in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect. 1996 Oct;104(10):1056–1061. doi: 10.1289/ehp.961041056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Savitz D. A., Andrews K. W., Pastore L. M. Drinking water and pregnancy outcome in central North Carolina: source, amount, and trihalomethane levels. Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Jun;103(6):592–596. doi: 10.1289/ehp.95103592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Smith M. K., Randall J. L., Stober J. A., Read E. J. Developmental toxicity of dichloroacetonitrile: a by-product of drinking water disinfection. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1989 May;12(4):765–772. doi: 10.1016/0272-0590(89)90008-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Swan S. H., Waller K. Disinfection by-products and adverse pregnancy outcomes: what is the agent and how should it be measured? Epidemiology. 1998 Sep;9(5):479–481. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199809000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Swan S. H., Waller K., Hopkins B., Windham G., Fenster L., Schaefer C., Neutra R. R. A prospective study of spontaneous abortion: relation to amount and source of drinking water consumed in early pregnancy. Epidemiology. 1998 Mar;9(2):126–133. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Waller K., Swan S. H., DeLorenze G., Hopkins B. Trihalomethanes in drinking water and spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology. 1998 Mar;9(2):134–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES