Abstract
Background: In epidemiological studies on physical workloads and back complaints, among the important features in modelling dose-response relations are the measurement strategy of the exposure and the nature of the dose-response relation that is assumed.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of these two features on the strength of the dose-response relation between physical load and severe low back pain.
Methods: The study population consisted of 769 workers in nursing homes and homes for the elderly. Observations at the workplace were made of 212 subjects. These observations were analysed to determine exposure to physical load according to two measurement strategies: the individual approach and the group approach. The nature of the dose-response relation was evaluated with nested logistic regression models.
Results: The group approach resulted in higher odds ratios for the associations between physical load and low back pain than the individual approach. Spline logistic regression models appeared to describe the dose-response relation between physical load and low back pain best. The corresponding curve showed small changes in risk for small changes in exposure, whereas the categorical model only showed sudden large changes in risk at predefined exposure values.
Conclusion: The choice for a particular measurement strategy of physical load influences the strength of the associations between physical load and severe low back pain. Spline models allow changes in risk over the whole exposure range and are therefore a promising approach to identify quantitative dose-response patterns between physical load and low back pain.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (271.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Armstrong B. G. Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Oct;55(10):651–656. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.10.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bashir S. A., Duffy S. W. The correction of risk estimates for measurement error. Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;7(2):154–164. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00149-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdorf A. Reducing random measurement error in assessing postural load on the back in epidemiologic surveys. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Feb;21(1):15–23. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdorf A., Sorock G. Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Aug;23(4):243–256. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995 Jul;6(4):356–365. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199507000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoogendoorn W. E., van Poppel M. N., Bongers P. M., Koes B. W., Bouter L. M. Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999 Oct;25(5):387–403. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karasek R., Baker D., Marxer F., Ahlbom A., Theorell T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694–705. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kilbom A. Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders--what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(Spec No):30–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuorinka I., Jonsson B., Kilbom A., Vinterberg H., Biering-Sørensen F., Andersson G., Jørgensen K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu K., Stamler J., Dyer A., McKeever J., McKeever P. Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(6-7):399–418. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(78)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seixas N. S., Sheppard L. Maximizing accuracy and precision using individual and grouped exposure assessments. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Apr;22(2):94–101. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steenland K., Deddens J. A., Zhao S. Biases in estimating the effect of cumulative exposure in log-linear models when estimated exposure levels are assigned. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Feb;26(1):37–43. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Von Korff M., Ormel J., Keefe F. J., Dworkin S. F. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Winkel J., Mathiassen S. E. Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. Ergonomics. 1994 Jun;37(6):979–988. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Witte J. S., Greenland S. A nested approach to evaluating dose-response and trend. Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;7(3):188–193. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]