Abstract
Aims: To compare an innovative activating intervention with "care as usual" (control group) for the guidance of employees on sickness leave because of an adjustment disorder. It was hypothesised that the intervention would be more effective than care as usual in lowering the intensity of symptoms, increasing psychological resources, and decreasing sickness leave duration.
Methods: A prospective, cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out with 192 patients on first sickness leave for an adjustment disorder. Symptom intensity, sickness duration, and return to work rates were measured at 3 months and 12 months. Analyses were performed on an intention to treat basis.
Results: At 3 months, significantly more patients in the intervention group had returned to work compared with the control group. At 12 months all patients had returned to work, but sickness leave was shorter in the intervention group than in the control group. The recurrence rate was lower in the intervention group. There were no differences between the two study groups with regard to the decrease of symptoms. At baseline, symptom intensity was higher in the patients than in a normal reference population, but decreased over time in a similar manner in both groups to approximately normal levels.
Conclusion: The experimental intervention for adjustment disorders was successful in shortening sick leave duration, mainly by decreasing long term absenteeism.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (247.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Friedli K., King M. B., Lloyd M., Horder J. Randomised controlled assessment of non-directive psychotherapy versus routine general-practitioner care. Lancet. 1997 Dec 6;350(9092):1662–1665. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05298-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lindström I., Ohlund C., Eek C., Wallin L., Peterson L. E., Nachemson A. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992 Jun;17(6):641–652. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199206000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ormel J., Von Korff M., Van den Brink W., Katon W., Brilman E., Oldehinkel T. Depression, anxiety, and social disability show synchrony of change in primary care patients. Am J Public Health. 1993 Mar;83(3):385–390. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.3.385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearlin L. I., Schooler C. The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav. 1978 Mar;19(1):2–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott A. I., Freeman C. P. Edinburgh primary care depression study: treatment outcome, patient satisfaction, and cost after 16 weeks. BMJ. 1992 Apr 4;304(6831):883–887. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6831.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Klink J. J., Blonk R. W., Schene A. H., van Dijk F. J. The benefits of interventions for work-related stress. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):270–276. doi: 10.2105/ajph.91.2.270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]