Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2003 Jul;60(7):468–474. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.7.468

The effect on ambulatory blood pressure of working under favourably and unfavourably perceived supervisors

N Wager 1, G Fieldman 1, T Hussey 1
PMCID: PMC1740583  PMID: 12819279

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the role played by employees' perceptions of their supervisors' interactional styles as a possible source of workplace stress that may be associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates from cardiovascular disorders in workers in the lower strata of organisational hierarchies.

Methods: A controlled, quasi-experimental, field study of female healthcare assistants. Allocation to the experimental and control groups was based on participants' responses to a supervisor interactional style questionnaire. Experimental participants (n = 13) reported working under two divergently perceived supervisors at the same workplace, on different days. The control group (n = 15) worked either under one supervisor, or two similarly perceived supervisors. Ambulatory blood pressure was recorded every 30 minutes, over a 12 hour period for three days.

Results: The control group showed a 3 mm Hg difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and a non-significant difference in diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mean difference 1 mm Hg) between the two supervisor conditions. The experimental group showed significantly higher SBP (15 mm Hg) and DBP (7 mm Hg) when working under a less favoured compared to a favoured supervisor. The degree of divergence in perceptions of supervisors shows a significant positive relation with the difference in blood pressure between the two workdays. Divergence in perceptions of interpersonal fairness is the strongest predictor of difference in blood pressure.

Conclusion: An unfavourably perceived supervisor is a potent workplace stressor, which might have a clinically significant impact on supervisees' cardiovascular functioning.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (159.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bornstein R. F. The dependent personality: developmental, social, and clinical perspectives. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):3–23. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins R., MacMahon S. Blood pressure, antihypertensive drug treatment and the risks of stroke and of coronary heart disease. Br Med Bull. 1994 Apr;50(2):272–298. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dembroski T. M., MacDougall J. M., Williams R. B., Haney T. L., Blumenthal J. A. Components of Type A, hostility, and anger-in: relationship to angiographic findings. Psychosom Med. 1985 May-Jun;47(3):219–233. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198505000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dormann C., Zapf D. Social support, social stressors at work, and depressive symptoms: testing for main and moderating effects with structural equations in a three-wave longitudinal study. J Appl Psychol. 1999 Dec;84(6):874–884. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fox M. L., Dwyer D. J., Ganster D. C. Effects of stressful job demands and control on physiological and attitudinal outcomes in a hospital setting. Acad Manage J. 1993 Apr;36(2):289–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Harburg E., Blakelock E. H., Jr, Roeper P. R. Resentful and reflective coping with arbitrary authority and blood pressure: Detroit. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):189–202. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haynes S. G., Feinleib M., Kannel W. B. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham Study. III. Eight-year incidence of coronary heart disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1980 Jan;111(1):37–58. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Haynes S. G., Levine S., Scotch N., Feinleib M., Kannel W. B. The relationship of psychosocial factors to coronary heart disease in the Framingham study. I. Methods and risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1978 May;107(5):362–383. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hemingway H., Marmot M. Evidence based cardiology: psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 1999 May 29;318(7196):1460–1467. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7196.1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. James G. D., Yee L. S., Harshfield G. A., Blank S. G., Pickering T. G. The influence of happiness, anger, and anxiety on the blood pressure of borderline hypertensives. Psychosom Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;48(7):502–508. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198609000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnson J. V., Hall E. M. Job strain, work place social support, and cardiovascular disease: a cross-sectional study of a random sample of the Swedish working population. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336–1342. doi: 10.2105/ajph.78.10.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jonas B. S., Lando J. F. Negative affect as a prospective risk factor for hypertension. Psychosom Med. 2000 Mar-Apr;62(2):188–196. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200003000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marmot M. G., Shipley M. J. Do socioeconomic differences in mortality persist after retirement? 25 year follow up of civil servants from the first Whitehall study. BMJ. 1996 Nov 9;313(7066):1177–1180. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7066.1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Marmot M. G., Shipley M. J., Rose G. Inequalities in death--specific explanations of a general pattern? Lancet. 1984 May 5;1(8384):1003–1006. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92337-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Martin H. J. A revised measure of approval motivation and its relationship to social desirability. J Pers Assess. 1984 Oct;48(5):508–519. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4805_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Perini C., Müller F. B., Bühler F. R. Suppressed aggression accelerates early development of essential hypertension. J Hypertens. 1991 Jun;9(6):499–503. doi: 10.1097/00004872-199106000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Quine L. Workplace bullying in NHS community trust: staff questionnaire survey. BMJ. 1999 Jan 23;318(7178):228–232. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7178.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rook K. S. The negative side of social interaction: impact on psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 May;46(5):1097–1108. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.46.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sega R., Trocino G., Lanzarotti A., Carugo S., Cesana G., Schiavina R., Valagussa F., Bombelli M., Giannattasio C., Zanchetti A. Alterations of cardiac structure in patients with isolated office, ambulatory, or home hypertension: Data from the general population (Pressione Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni [PAMELA] Study). Circulation. 2001 Sep 18;104(12):1385–1392. doi: 10.1161/hc3701.096100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Steptoe A., Evans O., Fieldman G. Perceptions of control over work: psychophysiological responses to self-paced and externally-paced tasks in an adult population sample. Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Apr;25(3):211–220. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8760(96)00747-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Theorell T., Ahlberg-Hulten G., Jodko M., Sigala F., de la Torre B. Influence of job strain and emotion on blood pressure in female hospital personnel during workhours. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Oct;19(5):313–318. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Thomas S. P. Women's anger: relationship of suppression to blood pressure. Nurs Res. 1997 Nov-Dec;46(6):324–330. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199711000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Egeren L. F. The relationship between job strain and blood pressure at work, at home, and during sleep. Psychosom Med. 1992 May-Jun;54(3):337–343. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199205000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Wamala S. P., Mittleman M. A., Horsten M., Schenck-Gustafsson K., Orth-Gomér K. Job stress and the occupational gradient in coronary heart disease risk in women. The Stockholm Female Coronary Risk Study. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Aug;51(4):481–489. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00006-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES