Abstract
Methods: Ten schools with high prevalence of BRS and 10 schools with low prevalence were selected. Dust collected from floors, horizontal surfaces, and exhaust outlets was tested at five concentrations on the lung epithelial cell line A549. The potency of the dust (PF) to stimulate IL-8 secretion was calculated from the initial linear part of the dose-response curves. The organic fraction of the dust samples was determined by incineration.
Results: The schools with low prevalence of symptoms had a BRS% of 4.4–11.0 and the schools with high prevalence a BRS% of 19.6–31.9. The PF of floor dust and surface dust correlated, and the PF was associated with the organic content of the dust. The schools with low prevalence of symptoms had a significantly lower PF than the schools with high prevalence. Using the cut point value of 4.5 ng IL-8/mg floor dust, significantly more high prevalence schools were found above the cut point than below.
Conclusion: The PF of the floor dust samples correlated significantly with the prevalence of symptoms in the schools. The content of endotoxin and microorganisms did not seem to explain the inflammatory potential of the dust or BRS, and the substances in the dust causing the inflammatory potential are presently unknown.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Adler K. B., Fischer B. M., Wright D. T., Cohn L. A., Becker S. Interactions between respiratory epithelial cells and cytokines: relationships to lung inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 May 28;725:128–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb00275.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allermann L., Poulsen O. M. Inflammatory potential of dust from waste handling facilities measured as IL-8 secretion from lung epithelial cells in vitro. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000 Jun;44(4):259–269. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damgård Nielsen G., Alarie Y., Melchior Poulsen O., Andersen Nexø B. Possible mechanisms for the respiratory tract effects of noncarcinogenic indoor-climate pollutants and bases for their risk assessment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Jun;21(3):165–178. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Devalia J. L., Davies R. J. Airway epithelial cells and mediators of inflammation. Respir Med. 1993 Aug;87(6):405–408. doi: 10.1016/0954-6111(93)90064-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodgson M. Sick building syndrome. Occup Med. 2000 Jul-Sep;15(3):571–585. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Redlich C. A., Sparer J., Cullen M. R. Sick-building syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Apr 5;349(9057):1013–1016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07220-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rylander R., Lin R. H. (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan - relationship to indoor air-related symptoms, allergy and asthma. Toxicology. 2000 Nov 2;152(1-3):47–52. doi: 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00291-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rylander R. Symptoms and mechanisms--inflammation of the lung. Am J Ind Med. 1994 Jan;25(1):19–23. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700250107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Teeuw K. B., Vandenbroucke-Grauls C. M., Verhoef J. Airborne gram-negative bacteria and endotoxin in sick building syndrome. A study in Dutch governmental office buildings. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2339–2345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]