Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Dec;61(12):972–979. doi: 10.1136/oem.2003.012245

Dose-response relations between occupational exposures to physical and psychosocial factors and the risk of low back pain

J Jansen 1, H Morgenstern 1, A Burdorf 1
PMCID: PMC1740687  PMID: 15550602

Abstract

Aims: To assess dose-response relations between occupational exposures to physical and psychosocial factors and the risk of low back pain.

Methods: A cohort of 523 subjects, working in nursing homes and homes for the elderly, was followed prospectively for one year. Physical load for different occupations was assessed by quantitative observations at the workplace. Information on low back pain and other factors was gathered with questionnaires administered at baseline and at one year. Two outcome measures of low back pain incidence were used: any new episode of pain lasting for at least a few hours during follow up (LBP); and any new episode of disabling pain that interfered with daily activities during follow up (LBP/D). Hierarchical regression analysis with a spline function was used to estimate dose-response relations.

Results: The risk of LBP was not associated with physical factors, controlling for confounders; but this outcome was inversely associated with age and weakly, though imprecisely, associated with two psychosocial factors—low decision authority and high work demands. In contrast, the risk of LBP/D was positively associated with age and not associated with the psychosocial factors. Trunk flexion over 45 degrees was monotonically associated with the risk of LBP/D; the estimated relative risk was 3.18 (95% CI 1.13 to 9.00) for 1 hour and 45 minutes of bending per week (90th centile), relative to 30 minutes per week. The hierarchical estimates of effect were more stable than were the maximum likelihood estimates.

Conclusion: Occupational exposure to trunk flexion over 45 degrees appears to be a risk factor for low back pain with disability among persons employed in nursing homes and homes for the elderly in the Netherlands.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (104.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Armstrong B. G. Effect of measurement error on epidemiological studies of environmental and occupational exposures. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Oct;55(10):651–656. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.10.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burdorf A. Reducing random measurement error in assessing postural load on the back in epidemiologic surveys. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1995 Feb;21(1):15–23. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burdorf A., Sorock G. Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Aug;23(4):243–256. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Devereux J. J., Buckle P. W., Vlachonikolis I. G. Interactions between physical and psychosocial risk factors at work increase the risk of back disorders: an epidemiological approach. Occup Environ Med. 1999 May;56(5):343–353. doi: 10.1136/oem.56.5.343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Elders L. A., Burdorf A. Interrelations of risk factors and low back pain in scaffolders. Occup Environ Med. 2001 Sep;58(9):597–603. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.9.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Greenland S. A semi-Bayes approach to the analysis of correlated multiple associations, with an application to an occupational cancer-mortality study. Stat Med. 1992 Jan 30;11(2):219–230. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780110208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Greenland S. Dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiology: alternatives to categorical analysis. Epidemiology. 1995 Jul;6(4):356–365. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199507000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Greenland S. Methods for epidemiologic analyses of multiple exposures: a review and comparative study of maximum-likelihood, preliminary-testing, and empirical-Bayes regression. Stat Med. 1993 Apr 30;12(8):717–736. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780120802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenland S. When should epidemiologic regressions use random coefficients? Biometrics. 2000 Sep;56(3):915–921. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00915.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoogendoorn W. E., Bongers P. M., de Vet H. C., Douwes M., Koes B. W., Miedema M. C., Ariëns G. A., Bouter L. M. Flexion and rotation of the trunk and lifting at work are risk factors for low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Dec 1;25(23):3087–3092. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hoogendoorn W. E., Bongers P. M., de Vet H. C., Houtman I. L., Ariëns G. A., van Mechelen W., Bouter L. M. Psychosocial work characteristics and psychological strain in relation to low-back pain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001 Aug;27(4):258–267. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoogendoorn W. E., van Poppel M. N., Bongers P. M., Koes B. W., Bouter L. M. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 Aug 15;25(16):2114–2125. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jansen J. P., Burdorf A. Effects of measurement strategy and statistical analysis on dose-response relations between physical workload and low back pain. Occup Environ Med. 2003 Dec;60(12):942–947. doi: 10.1136/oem.60.12.942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Josephson M., Vingård E. Workplace factors and care seeking for low-back pain among female nursing personnel. MUSIC-Norrtälje Study Group. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Dec;24(6):465–472. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Karasek R., Baker D., Marxer F., Ahlbom A., Theorell T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694–705. doi: 10.2105/ajph.71.7.694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kilbom A. Assessment of physical exposure in relation to work-related musculoskeletal disorders--what information can be obtained from systematic observations? Scand J Work Environ Health. 1994;20(Spec No):30–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuorinka I., Jonsson B., Kilbom A., Vinterberg H., Biering-Sørensen F., Andersson G., Jørgensen K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lagerström M., Hansson T., Hagberg M. Work-related low-back problems in nursing. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Dec;24(6):449–464. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Leboeuf-Yde C., Lauritsen J. M., Lauritzen T. Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 Apr 15;22(8):877–881. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199704150-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ozguler A., Leclerc A., Landre M. F., Pietri-Taleb F., Niedhammer I. Individual and occupational determinants of low back pain according to various definitions of low back pain. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Mar;54(3):215–220. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.3.215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Punnett L., Fine L. J., Keyserling W. M., Herrin G. D., Chaffin D. B. Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Oct;17(5):337–346. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Riihimäki H. Low-back pain, its origin and risk indicators. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Apr;17(2):81–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Seixas N. S., Sheppard L. Maximizing accuracy and precision using individual and grouped exposure assessments. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Apr;22(2):94–101. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Smedley J., Egger P., Cooper C., Coggon D. Prospective cohort study of predictors of incident low back pain in nurses. BMJ. 1997 Apr 26;314(7089):1225–1228. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7089.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Steenland K., Deddens J. A., Zhao S. Biases in estimating the effect of cumulative exposure in log-linear models when estimated exposure levels are assigned. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000 Feb;26(1):37–43. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Von Korff M., Ormel J., Keefe F. J., Dworkin S. F. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain. 1992 Aug;50(2):133–149. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90154-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Winkel J., Mathiassen S. E. Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. Ergonomics. 1994 Jun;37(6):979–988. doi: 10.1080/00140139408963711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Witte J. S., Greenland S. A nested approach to evaluating dose-response and trend. Ann Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;7(3):188–193. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Witte J. S., Greenland S., Haile R. W., Bird C. L. Hierarchical regression analysis applied to a study of multiple dietary exposures and breast cancer. Epidemiology. 1994 Nov;5(6):612–621. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199411000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Witte J. S., Greenland S., Kim L. L. Software for hierarchical modeling of epidemiologic data. Epidemiology. 1998 Sep;9(5):563–566. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES