Abstract
Aim: To compare two different methods for assessment of postural load and duration of computer use in office workers.
Methods: The study population existed of 87 computer workers. Questionnaire data about exposure were compared with exposures measured by a standardised or objective method. Measuring true exposure to postural load consisted of an observation of the workstation design and posture by a trained observer. A software program was used to record individual computer use.
Results: Comparing the answers for each item of postural load, six of eleven items showed low agreement (kappa <0.20). For six items the sensitivity was below 50%, while for eight items the specificity was 80% or higher. Computer workers were unable to identify risk factors in their workplace and work posture. On average, computer workers overestimated their total computer use by 1.6 hours. The agreement among employees who reported a maximum of three hours of computer use per day was higher than the agreement among employees with a high duration of computer use.
Conclusions: Self-report by means of this questionnaire is not a very reliable method to measure postural load and duration of computer use. This study emphasises that the challenge to develop quick and inexpensive techniques for assessing exposure to postural load and duration of computer use is still open.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burdorf A., Laan J. Comparison of methods for the assessment of postural load on the back. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991 Dec;17(6):425–429. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burdorf A., van der Beek A. Exposure assessment strategies for work-related risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 (Suppl 4):25–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dane Dana, Feuerstein Michael, Huang Grant D., Dimberg Lennart, Ali Danielle, Lincoln Andrew. Measurement properties of a self-report index of ergonomic exposures for use in an office work environment. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Jan;44(1):73–81. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200201000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faucett J., Rempel D. Musculoskeletal symptoms related to video display terminal use: an analysis of objective and subjective exposure estimates. AAOHN J. 1996 Jan;44(1):33–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Homan Michelle M., Armstrong Thomas J. Evaluation of three methodologies for assessing work activity during computer use. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va) 2003 Jan-Feb;64(1):48–55. doi: 10.1080/15428110308984784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jensen Chris. Development of neck and hand-wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2003 Jun;29(3):197–205. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karasek R., Brisson C., Kawakami N., Houtman I., Bongers P., Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998 Oct;3(4):322–355. doi: 10.1037//1076-8998.3.4.322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karlqvist LK, Hagberg M, Köster M, Wenemark M, nell R. Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Computer-assisted Design (CAD) Operators and Evaluation of a Self-assessment Questionnaire. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1996 Jul;2(3):185–194. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1996.2.3.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ketola Ritva, Toivonen Risto, Häkkänen Marketta, Luukkonen Ritva, Takala Esa-Pekka, Viikari-Juntura Eira, Expert Group in Ergonomics Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Feb;28(1):18–24. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuorinka I., Jonsson B., Kilbom A., Vinterberg H., Biering-Sørensen F., Andersson G., Jørgensen K. Standardised Nordic questionnaires for the analysis of musculoskeletal symptoms. Appl Ergon. 1987 Sep;18(3):233–237. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li G., Buckle P. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics. 1999 May;42(5):674–695. doi: 10.1080/001401399185388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Melhorn J. M. The impact of workplace screening on the occurrence of cumulative trauma disorders and workers' compensation claims. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Feb;41(2):84–92. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199902000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Viikari-Juntura E., Rauas S., Martikainen R., Kuosma E., Riihimäki H., Takala E. P., Saarenmaa K. Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1996 Aug;22(4):251–259. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiktorin C., Karlqvist L., Winkel J. Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993 Jun;19(3):208–214. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]