Abstract
Methods: This paper presents a simple computer program for incidence density sampling. This program was evaluated using data derived from a cohort study of mortality among workers employed in the nuclear weapons industry. Controls were selected for cases via incidence density sampling; an estimate of the exposure-mortality association was obtained via conditional logistic regression. After 100 iterations of this procedure, the average effect estimate was compared to the risk estimate obtained via proportional hazards regression. The same methods were used to evaluate a program for incidence density sampling that was proposed previously by Pearce in 1989.5
Results: Relative risk estimates obtained from nested case-control analyses conducted using the incidence density sampling program reported in this paper are unbiased. In contrast, the program for incidence density sampling proposed by Pearce5 tended to produce biased relative risk estimates; the magnitude of bias increased with increasing numbers of controls selected per case.
Conclusions: The computer program described in this paper offers a simple approach to incidence density sampling for nested case-control analyses with exact matching on attained age and appropriate enumeration of the pool of eligible controls for each case. This method overcomes problems of bias inherent in a previously proposed program for incidence density sampling.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (86.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beaumont J. J., Steenland K., Minton A., Meyer S. A computer program for incidence density sampling of controls in case-control studies nested within occupational cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Jan;129(1):212–219. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lubin J. H., Gail M. H. Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies. Biometrics. 1984 Mar;40(1):63–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearce N., Checkoway H. A simple computer program for generating person-time data in cohort studies involving time-related factors. Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;125(6):1085–1091. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pearce N. Incidence density matching with a simple SAS computer program. Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Dec;18(4):981–984. doi: 10.1093/ije/18.4.981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prentice R. L. On the design of synthetic case-control studies. Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):301–310. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Richardson D. B., Wing S. Greater sensitivity to ionizing radiation at older age: follow-up of workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory through 1990. Int J Epidemiol. 1999 Jun;28(3):428–436. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.3.428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robins J. M., Gail M. H., Lubin J. H. More on "Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies". Biometrics. 1986 Jun;42(2):293–299. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]