Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Feb;61(2):163–166. doi: 10.1136/oem.2002.006221

Integrating qualitative methods into occupational health research: a study of women flight attendants

T Ballard 1, L Corradi 1, L Lauria 1, C Mazzanti 1, G Scaravelli 1, F Sgorbissa 1, P Romito 1, A Verdecchia 1
PMCID: PMC1740718  PMID: 14739383

Abstract

Aims: To identify possible work related sources of psychosocial stress in order to develop pertinent questionnaire items for a cross-sectional health survey of 3000 Italian women flight attendants, and to solicit suggestions on improving survey participation.

Methods: Qualitative study in which 26 current and former women flight attendants participated: three focus groups of 6–7 participants each and six in-depth individual interviews. The session themes included positive and negative aspects of the job; relationships with colleagues, superiors, and passengers; perception of occupational risk for serious diseases; compatibility of work and family; and experiences of work related sources of stress and their effect on health. A transcript based analysis of the focus groups and interviews was used to identify emerging themes related to risk factors for mental health problems.

Results: The participants indicated that mental health was a major concern. Several work related risk factors possibly related to adverse outcomes, such as depression and anxiety, were highlighted. These included isolation and solitude, fears of being inadequate partners and mothers due to job demands, passenger relationships, and lack of protection by employers with respect to workplace exposures and violent passengers. The information gained was used to develop a mental health module for inclusion in the health survey questionnaire which included questions on history of severe depression or anxiety, suicidal ideation or attempt, substance abuse, workplace sexual harassment, social support, leisure time activities, relationship with a partner, and role as mother.

Conclusions: Employing qualitative methods to identify work related sources of psychosocial stress enabled development of pertinent questionnaire items for a cross-sectional epidemiological study of women flight attendants. Follow up qualitative research may be necessary in order to put the cross-sectional study findings into context and to explore actions or strategies for preventing work related health problems evidenced from the survey.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (93.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aspholm R., Lindbohm M. L., Paakkulainen H., Taskinen H., Nurminen T., Tiitinen A. Spontaneous abortions among Finnish flight attendants. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jun;41(6):486–491. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199906000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ballard Terri J., Lagorio Susanna, De Santis Marco, De Angelis Giovanni, Santaquilani Mariano, Caldora Massimiliano, Verdecchia Arduino. A retrospective cohort mortality study of Italian commercial airline cockpit crew and cabin attendants, 1965-96. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002 Apr-Jun;8(2):87–96. doi: 10.1179/107735202800338957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Black N. Why we need qualitative research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Oct;48(5):425–426. doi: 10.1136/jech.48.5.425-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gjerdingen D., McGovern P., Bekker M., Lundberg U., Willemsen T. Women's work roles and their impact on health, well-being, and career: comparisons between the United States, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Women Health. 2000;31(4):1–20. doi: 10.1300/j013v31n04_01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lynge E. Commentary: cancer in the air. Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;30(4):830–832. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.4.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mergler D. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in occupational health for a better understanding of the impact of work-related disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 (Suppl 4):54–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Needleman C., Needleman M. L. Qualitative methods for intervention research. Am J Ind Med. 1996 Apr;29(4):329–337. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199604)29:4<329::AID-AJIM10>3.0.CO;2-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pukkala E., Auvinen A., Wahlberg G. Incidence of cancer among Finnish airline cabin attendants, 1967-92. BMJ. 1995 Sep 9;311(7006):649–652. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7006.649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rafnsson V., Tulinius H., Jónasson J. G., Hrafnkelsson J. Risk of breast cancer in female flight attendants: a population-based study (Iceland). Cancer Causes Control. 2001 Feb;12(2):95–101. doi: 10.1023/a:1008983416836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Reynolds Peggy, Cone James, Layefsky Michael, Goldberg Debbie E., Hurley Susan. Cancer incidence in California flight attendants (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2002 May;13(4):317–324. doi: 10.1023/a:1015284014563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Smolensky M. H., Lee E., Mott D., Colligan M. A health profile of American flight attendants (FA). J Hum Ergol (Tokyo) 1982;11 (Suppl):103–119. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES