Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2004 Apr;61(4):305–311. doi: 10.1136/oem.2002.004028

A case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute hand injury

G Sorock 1, D Lombardi 1, R Hauser 1, E Eisen 1, R Herrick 1, M Mittleman 1
PMCID: PMC1740748  PMID: 15031387

Abstract

Background: Workers with acute hand injuries account for over 1 000 000 emergency department visits annually in the United States.

Aims: To determine potential transient risk factors for occupational acute hand injury.

Methods: Subjects were recruited from 23 occupational health clinics in five northeastern states in the USA. In a telephone interview, subjects were asked to report the occurrence of seven potential risk factors within a 90-minute time period before an acute hand injury. Each case also provided control information on exposures during the month before the injury. The self-matched feature of the study design controlled for stable between-person confounders.

Results: A total of 1166 subjects were interviewed (891 men, 275 women), with a mean age (SD) of 37.2 years (11.4). The median time interval between injury and interview was 1.3 days. Sixty three per cent of subjects had a laceration. The relative risk of a hand injury was increased when working with equipment, tools, or work pieces not performing as expected (11.0, 95% CI 9.4 to 12.8), or when using a different work method to do a task (10.5, 95% CI 8.7 to 12.7). Other transient factors in decreasing order of relative risk were doing an unusual task, being distracted, and being rushed. Wearing gloves reduced the relative risk by 60% (0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.5). Occupational category, job experience, and safety training were found to alter several of these effects.

Conclusion: The results suggest the importance of these transient, potentially modifiable factors in the aetiology of acute hand injury at work. Attempts to modify these exposures by various strategies may reduce the incidence of acute hand injury at work.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (346.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bell Jennifer L., MacDonald Leslie A. Hand lacerations and job design characteristics in line-paced assembly. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Aug;45(8):848–856. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000083032.56116.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses treated in hospital emergency departments--United States, 1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001 Apr 27;50(16):313–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Courtney T. K., Webster B. S. Disabling occupational morbidity in the United States. An alternative way of seeing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' data. J Occup Environ Med. 1999 Jan;41(1):60–69. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199901000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Greenland S., Robins J. M. Estimation of a common effect parameter from sparse follow-up data. Biometrics. 1985 Mar;41(1):55–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Haddon W., Jr Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy. Public Health Rep. 1980 Sep-Oct;95(5):411–421. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagberg M., Christiani D., Courtney T. K., Halperin W., Leamon T. B., Smith T. J. Conceptual and definitional issues in occupational injury epidemiology. Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):106–115. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<106::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hertz R. P., Emmett E. A. Risk factors for occupational hand injury. J Occup Med. 1986 Jan;28(1):36–41. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198601000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lombardi David A., Sorock Gary S., Hauser Russ, Nasca Philip C., Eisen Ellen A., Herrick Robert F., Mittleman Murray A. Temporal factors and the prevalence of transient exposures at the time of an occupational traumatic hand injury. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Aug;45(8):832–840. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000083030.56116.1a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lombardi David A., Sorock Gary S., Lesch Mary F., Hauser Russ, Eisen Ellen A., Herrick Robert F., Mittleman Murray A. A reliability study of potential risk factors for acute traumatic occupational hand injuries. Am J Ind Med. 2002 Oct;42(4):336–343. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Maclure M., Mittleman M. A. Should we use a case-crossover design? Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:193–221. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jan 15;133(2):144–153. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mittleman M. A., Maclure M., Robins J. M. Control sampling strategies for case-crossover studies: an assessment of relative efficiency. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Jul 1;142(1):91–98. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mittleman M. A., Maldonado G., Gerberich S. G., Smith G. S., Sorock G. S. Alternative approaches to analytical designs in occupational injury epidemiology. Am J Ind Med. 1997 Aug;32(2):129–141. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199708)32:2<129::aid-ajim4>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ong C. N., Phoon W. O., Iskandar N., Chia K. S. Shiftwork and work injuries in an iron and steel mill. Appl Ergon. 1987 Mar;18(1):51–56. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90070-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rautiala Sirpa, Torvinen Eila, Torkko Pirjo, Suomalainen Sini, Nevalainen Aino, Kalliokoski Pentti, Katila Marja-Leena. Potentially pathogenic, slow-growing mycobacteria released into workplace air during the remediation of buildings. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Jan;1(1):1–6. doi: 10.1080/15459620490250008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sorock G. S., Lombardi D. A., Gabel C. L., Smith G. S., Mittleman M. A. Case-crossover studies of occupational trauma: methodological caveats. Inj Prev. 2001 Sep;7 (Suppl 1):i38–i42. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.suppl_1.i38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sorock G. S., Lombardi D. A., Hauser R. B., Eisen E. A., Herrick R. F., Mittleman M. A. A case-crossover study of occupational traumatic hand injury: methods and initial findings. Am J Ind Med. 2001 Feb;39(2):171–179. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200102)39:2<171::aid-ajim1004>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sorock G. S., Smith E., Hall N. Hospitalized occupational finger amputations, New Jersey, 1985 and 1986. Am J Ind Med. 1993 Mar;23(3):439–447. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700230307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sorock Gary S., Lombardi David A., Hauser Russ B., Eisen Ellen A., Herrick Robert F., Mittleman Murray A. Acute traumatic occupational hand injuries: type, location, and severity. J Occup Environ Med. 2002 Apr;44(4):345–351. doi: 10.1097/00043764-200204000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Trump T. R., Etherton J. R. Machine-cycling errors with foot switches in repetitive tasks. A workstation design simulation experiment. Appl Ergon. 1986 Sep;17(3):199–208. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(86)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES