Abstract
Background: Most epidemiological studies on adverse health effects among women in relation to occupational magnetic field exposure have been based on information about men's exposure.
Aims: To create a job-exposure matrix for occupational exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields among women.
Methods and Results: Measurements were performed using personal magnetic field meters (Emdex Lite) carried by the subjects for 24 hours on a normal workday. Subjects were volunteer women working in the occupations identified as common among women in Stockholm County based on the 1980 census. A total of 471 measurements were made in 49 different occupations, with a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 24 measurements in each occupation. The included occupations cover about 85% of the female population gainfully employed in 1980. Parameters representing average and peak magnetic field exposures, temporal change in the exposure, and proportion of time spent above certain exposure levels were calculated both for the workday and for the total 24 hour period grouped by occupational titles. The occupations with higher than average exposure were cashiers, working proprietors in retail trade, air stewardesses, dental nurses, cooks, post-office clerks and kitchen maids.
Conclusions: This new job-exposure matrix substantially increases the knowledge about magnetic field exposure among women and can be used for exposure assessment in future studies.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (199.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Burch J. B., Reif J. S., Yost M. G., Keefe T. J., Pitrat C. A. Nocturnal excretion of a urinary melatonin metabolite among electric utility workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Jun;24(3):183–189. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deadman J. E., Infante-Rivard C. Individual estimation of exposures to extremely low frequency magnetic fields in jobs commonly held by women. Am J Epidemiol. 2002 Feb 15;155(4):368–378. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.4.368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feychting M., Floderus B., Ahlbom A. Parental occupational exposure to magnetic fields and childhood cancer (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control. 2000 Feb;11(2):151–156. doi: 10.1023/a:1008922016813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feychting M., Forssén U., Floderus B. Occupational and residential magnetic field exposure and leukemia and central nervous system tumors. Epidemiology. 1997 Jul;8(4):384–389. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199707000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feychting M., Pedersen N. L., Svedberg P., Floderus B., Gatz M. Dementia and occupational exposure to magnetic fields. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1998 Feb;24(1):46–53. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Floderus B, Persson T, Stenlund C. Magnetic-field Exposures in the Workplace: Reference Distribution and Exposures in Occupational Groups. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1996 Jul;2(3):226–238. doi: 10.1179/oeh.1996.2.3.226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forssén U. M., Feychting M., Rutqvist L. E., Floderus B., Ahlbom A. Occupational and residential magnetic field exposure and breast cancer in females. Epidemiology. 2000 Jan;11(1):24–29. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200001000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forssén Ulla M., Ahlbom Anders, Feychting Maria. Relative contribution of residential and occupational magnetic field exposure over twenty-four hours among people living close to and far from a power line. Bioelectromagnetics. 2002 Apr;23(3):239–244. doi: 10.1002/bem.10013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen N. H., Sobel E., Davanipour Z., Gillette L. M., Niiranen J., Wilson B. W. EMF exposure assessment in the Finnish garment industry: evaluation of proposed EMF exposure metrics. Bioelectromagnetics. 2000 Jan;21(1):57–67. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-186x(200001)21:1<57::aid-bem9>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harris C., Boivin W., Boyd S., Coletta J., Kerr L., Kempa K., Aronow S. Electromagnetic field strength levels surrounding electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems. Health Phys. 2000 Jan;78(1):21–27. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200001000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelsh M. A., Kheifets L., Smith R. The impact of work environment, utility, and sampling design on occupational magnetic field exposure summaries. AIHAJ. 2000 Mar-Apr;61(2):174–182. doi: 10.1080/15298660008984526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kelsh Michael A., Bracken T. Dan, Sahl Jack D., Shum Mona, Ebi Kristie L. Occupational magnetic field exposures of garment workers: results of personal and survey measurements. Bioelectromagnetics. 2003 Jul;24(5):316–326. doi: 10.1002/bem.10112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee Geraldine M., Neutra Raymond R., Hristova Lilia, Yost Michael, Hiatt Robert A. A nested case-control study of residential and personal magnetic field measures and miscarriages. Epidemiology. 2002 Jan;13(1):21–31. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li De-Kun, Odouli Roxana, Wi Soora, Janevic Teresa, Golditch Ira, Bracken T. Dan, Senior Russell, Rankin Richard, Iriye Richard. A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage. Epidemiology. 2002 Jan;13(1):9–20. doi: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McCurdy A. L., Wijnberg L., Loomis D., Savitz D., Nylander-French L. A. Exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic fields among working women and homemakers. Ann Occup Hyg. 2001 Nov;45(8):643–650. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]