Skip to main content
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 2005 Oct;62(10):682–687. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.019117

A search strategy for occupational health intervention studies

J Verbeek 1, J Salmi 1, I Pasternack 1, M Jauhiainen 1, I Laamanen 1, F Schaafsma 1, C Hulshof 1, F van Dijk 1
PMCID: PMC1740874  PMID: 16169913

Abstract

Background: As a result of low numbers and diversity in study type, occupational health intervention studies are not easy to locate in electronic literature databases.

Aim: To develop a search strategy that facilitates finding occupational health intervention studies in Medline, both for researchers and practitioners.

Methods: A gold standard of articles was created by going through two whole volumes of 19 biomedical journals, both occupational health specialty and non-occupational health journals. Criteria for occupational health intervention studies were: evaluating an intervention with an occupational health outcome and a study design with a control group. Each journal was searched independently by two of the authors. Search terms were developed by asking specialists and counting word frequencies in gold standard articles.

Results: Out of 11 022 articles published we found 149 occupational health intervention studies. The most sensitive single terms were work*[tw] (sensitivity 71%, specificity 88%) and effect*[tw] (sensitivity 75%, specificity 63%). The most sensitive string was (effect*[tw] OR control*[tw] OR evaluation*[tw] OR program*[tw]) AND (work*[tw] OR occupation*[tw] OR prevention*[tw] OR protect*[tw]) (sensitivity 89%, specificity 78%). The most specific single terms were "occupational health"[tw] (sensitivity 22%, specificity 98%) and effectiveness[tw] (sensitivity 22%, specificity 98%). The most specific string was (program[tw] OR "prevention and control"[sh]) AND (occupational[tw] OR worker*[tw]) (sensitivity 47%, specificity 98%).

Conclusion: No single search terms are available that can locate occupational health intervention studies sufficiently. The authors' search strings have acceptable sensitivity and specificity to be used by researchers and practitioners respectively. Redefinition and elaboration of keywords in Medline could greatly facilitate the location of occupational health intervention studies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (84.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bachmann Lucas M., Coray Reto, Estermann Pius, Ter Riet Gerben. Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002 Nov-Dec;9(6):653–658. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bachmann Lucas M., Estermann Pius, Kronenberg Corinna, ter Riet Gerben. Identifying diagnostic accuracy studies in EMBASE. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Jul;91(3):341–346. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briss P. A., Zaza S., Pappaioanou M., Fielding J., Wright-De Agüero L., Truman B. I., Hopkins D. P., Mullen P. D., Thompson R. S., Woolf S. H. Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Am J Prev Med. 2000 Jan;18(1 Suppl):35–43. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gehanno J. F., Paris C., Thirion B., Caillard J. F. Assessment of bibliographic databases performance in information retrieval for occupational and environmental toxicology. Occup Environ Med. 1998 Aug;55(8):562–566. doi: 10.1136/oem.55.8.562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gehanno J. F., Thirion B. How to select publications on occupational health: the usefulness of Medline and the impact factor. Occup Environ Med. 2000 Oct;57(10):706–709. doi: 10.1136/oem.57.10.706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Haynes R. Brian, McKibbon K. Ann, Wilczynski Nancy L., Walter Stephen D., Werre Stephen R., Hedges Team Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of treatment from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2005 May 13;330(7501):1179–1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38446.498542.8F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Haynes R. Brian, Wilczynski Nancy L. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey. BMJ. 2004 Apr 8;328(7447):1040–1040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38068.557998.EE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Verbeek Jos H., van Dijk Frank J., Malmivaara Antti, Hulshof Carel T., Räsänen Kimmo, Kankaanpä Eila E., Mukala Kriistina. Evidence-based medicine for occupational health. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2002 Jun;28(3):197–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Verbeek Jos, Husman Kaj, van Dijk Frank, Jauhiainen Merja, Pasternack Iris, Vainio Harri. Building an evidence base for occupational health interventions. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2004 Apr;30(2):164–170. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Wilczynski Nancy L., Haynes R. Brian, Hedges Team Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey. BMC Med. 2004 Jun 9;2:23–23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES